Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Stock turbo + full bolt ons.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 06:31 PM
  #1  
VKEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: WPB, Florida
Stock turbo + full bolt ons.

Hey guys, I recently got a tune for my car. My mods are the followings: tbe, ETS fmic, full injen intake including licp uicp, walbro 255, and mbc. Tuned at 26psi.

Note: This is my first evo and it seems like I don't get much torque on the low end, I'm not sure if it is me or the way the car is when it not in boost. Might be a possible Boost Leak....So if you guys see something wrong with this graph, please give me some inputs.

I'm going for the hta green in a week so i'm trying to find out any possible error before another tune.


Last edited by VKEVO; Apr 19, 2011 at 06:54 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 07:30 PM
  #2  
zeus1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: manchester, new hampshire
did you ask the tuner if these results looked good for their dyno based on fuel and mods? what makes you think there is something wrong?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 07:52 PM
  #3  
VKEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: WPB, Florida
Originally Posted by zeus1
did you ask the tuner if these results looked good for their dyno based on fuel and mods? what makes you think there is something wrong?
It seems like there is no low end torque at 3K, is it suppose to be this way?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 07:55 PM
  #4  
YogSaahoth's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 780
Likes: 8
From: NY/PA
Looks pretty good to me. 25psi at 3600 rpm sounds about right. There's always a risk of boost leak...just do a good check after you swap turbos. Looks like a solid power curve
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 07:57 PM
  #5  
zeus1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: manchester, new hampshire
there is some spool time its only a 2.0 liter, what type of car did you own before?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 08:44 PM
  #6  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
Originally Posted by VKEVO
It seems like there is no low end torque at 3K, is it suppose to be this way?
the run was started at 3000rpm its not a v8 what do you expect? lol. looks fine to me.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2011 | 08:45 PM
  #7  
zeus1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
From: manchester, new hampshire
Originally Posted by tscompusa
the run was started at 3000rpm its not a v8 what do you expect? lol. looks fine to me.
agree
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2011 | 02:00 AM
  #8  
LGshow19's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Looks good to me just like everyone stated.

Pretty good power for minimal mods... good stuff.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2011 | 02:11 AM
  #9  
nqwjx's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: NY
on what type of fuel~
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2011 | 05:44 AM
  #10  
VKEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: WPB, Florida
This was done on a 93 octane, thanks for input guy. I owned a rsx before this so i'm still learning about the evo. I will post the dyno graph up once i got it tune again with the HTA Green.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2011 | 09:02 AM
  #11  
InitialE's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 717
Likes: 9
From: Somers, NY
My Evo's mods are fairly comparable. My torque curve came in earlier by a few 100s rpms https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...e-results.html.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2011 | 11:39 AM
  #12  
LGshow19's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by InitialE
My Evo's mods are fairly comparable. My torque curve came in earlier by a few 100s rpms https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...e-results.html.
Your pull also started about 500rpms sooner
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 06:01 AM
  #13  
InitialE's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 717
Likes: 9
From: Somers, NY
Originally Posted by LGshow19
Your pull also started about 500rpms sooner
Yeah, I realize that it is hard to compare different cars on different dynos, but I figure people in the know would understand the caveats. I don't get why his pull would start so late, though. Low-end torque is a nice feature of smaller turbos.

Last edited by InitialE; Apr 23, 2011 at 06:01 AM. Reason: wordsmithing.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 10:24 AM
  #14  
VKEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: WPB, Florida
Originally Posted by InitialE
Yeah, I realize that it is hard to compare different cars on different dynos, but I figure people in the know would understand the caveats. I don't get why his pull would start so late, though. Low-end torque is a nice feature of smaller turbos.
To most people who said it's 2.0 ( I agree) but it's AWD. It should move faster at a stop than most of the car out there. My torque doesn't get on until 3000k and I don't go higher than 3000k regular driving. My exedy twin clutch takes a few second to move in 1st gear ( moving too fast would stall the car). <<<---That and the no low torque( stock turbo) kept me thinking "why there is no low end torque"?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 12:37 PM
  #15  
TopSpeed's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Looks like some good power for the mods! Throw some cams in there along with a ported exhaust mani and o2 housing and you'll be close to 400!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:22 AM.