tscompusa2

iTrader: (22)

430 dynojet sounds more like it.. not 467. im sure its around 420-430 on newer VD software. still the results are on the money, and thats all that matters.

scotty225

iTrader: (2)

yea that is on the mustang dyno that car make over 510 on rre dyno. i would know that is my car.. fyi

tscompusa2

iTrader: (22)

RRE dyno reads like 8-10% higher then a dynojet.

sparky

iTrader: (1)

Thanks buddy! You should know

scotty225

iTrader: (2)

ok then. but to get back on topic they did a good job on this car.

tscompusa2

iTrader: (22)

agreed. the results are what they should be when theres nothing left on the table after a good tune

your tune is done right as well based on my other customer who has similar mods to you.

sparky

iTrader: (1)

I just get a little mixed up when I see scotty's numbers with an HTA Green vs. the other guys numbers with a stock IX turbo. It is just hard for me to reconcile the difference on the same fuel, both MIVEC's, and both at about the same boost level. Is the difference due to the fact that one is virtual dyno whereas the other is x dynamometer. I am just trying to factor in the difference between a stock IX turbo and an HTA Green.

tscompusa2

iTrader: (22)

well blueix's is at 480 right now on stock cams and more in it yet on e85. the hta green has no problems going past 500 on e85.. so i guess its safe to say the hta green has a good 50-60whp easy on a stock 9 turbo if not more depending on the circumstances.

based on what ive seen from multiple mustang vs vd results the mustang will read about 5% higher on dynojet settings in vd .. sometimes depending how the tuner tunes the car it may pull timing due to temperatures it sees outside and the vd ends up reading less in dynojet mode then the actual real mustang dyno in real life.

my friends evo that shows up as 560/460 dj in vd 1.1.0 trapped 132mph

sparky

iTrader: (1)

This is way above my comprehension level....but thanx for the explanation, tsomp.

PeteyTurbo@KHC

iTrader: (1)

[dlete

4g63evoeight

iTrader: (18)

the clutch was slipping on the 122 pass, you can deff hear it as it shows in the description..

was that 11.41 pass done with the QTP's? hard to tell in the vid

tscompusa2

iTrader: (22)

delete x2

03whitegsr

iTrader: (8)

FWIW, I made 360 WHP at 17-18 psi on the IX turbo on 91 octane so the 380WHP on 21 psi and 93 octane seems pretty reasonable to me.

Is this on the stock wastegate actuator? I haven't been able to get anything more then 26 psi spike and 17-18 psi by 7500 RPM on the stock actuator on my car. To see 31 psi peak and 21-22 psi at 7500 RPM on this car is pretty impressive to me.


A 90 WHP increase going from 93 octane to E85 and about 1 psi more boost above 6500 RPM.
I can't wait to put my car on E85 now after seeing this.

tscompusa2

iTrader: (22)

no ones really arguing the 93oct numbers.. im certainly not.. ive had cars do that on 93.. the e85 numbers are a bit off tho for the boost shown.

even when you bottom out the stock 9 actuator rod it still wont hold well, but it certainly will allow a higher spike.. looking at that curve it looks like its on the stock actuator with max preload imo. also keep in mind its using ecu boost, and when running at 100% wgdc its kind of similar to running with no vac line on the gate period, but its controlled. if i had to bet $ id say this car will put down 430ish on a real dynojet based on the boost curve as it sits. put in a fp 25psi wga and preload it some and it will overspin the turbo and make even more power uptop. will it hold up? no way.. but its what you want to do when you own a shop and are trying to get lots of positive attention.

PeteyTurbo@KHC

iTrader: (1)

dlete