Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

PTE 6766 vs. FP 3794 - 5 different boost levels - Boostin Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2013 | 09:26 AM
  #136  
GotWheelHop's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Definitely interested as I am getting a new turbo setup soon. This might give me reason to wait.
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 02:37 PM
  #137  
MrLith's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 715
Likes: 17
From: Welly NZ
Originally Posted by Boostin Perform
Results coming soon!
Awesome! Quite excited to see this, I love how turbochargers (and tuning etc) ideas seem to be progressing in leaps and bounds these days after being relatively stagnant for a few years. Cheers for sharing this kind of thing, is awesome
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 06:18 PM
  #138  
migs99's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: uk
how would spool vs power compare between the t3 .82 6766 vs the t4 1.32 6766? I have the T3 version and thinking of going t4 1.32!
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 08:31 AM
  #139  
Michael @ FP's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 333
Likes: 2
From: Dallas
Did you guys think we just sat around twiddling our thumbs? We gotta make something better so everyone else can copy us :P

- Michael
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 12:34 PM
  #140  
GotWheelHop's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
What a good reply. Lol.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 03:05 PM
  #141  
migs99's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: uk
useless reply
Reply
Old May 6, 2013 | 02:25 PM
  #142  
MrLith's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 715
Likes: 17
From: Welly NZ
Originally Posted by Michael @ FP
Did you guys think we just sat around twiddling our thumbs? We gotta make something better so everyone else can copy us :P
If you are referring to my comment, I wasn't implying that at all - if anything I was thinking of the period before you guys started releasing the HTA series... things have been "all on" since then
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 11:06 AM
  #143  
Michael @ FP's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 333
Likes: 2
From: Dallas


This car has two of the "Super" 94's on it.

-Michael
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 12:34 PM
  #144  
Migsubishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 13
From: Tampa bay area
Originally Posted by Michael @ FP

This car has two of the "Super" 94's on it.

-Michael
How much laggier would you say the super 94 is compared to the hta86, 400rpm, 600, 1000rpm?
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 01:09 PM
  #145  
GotWheelHop's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Migsubishi
How much laggier would you say the super 94 is compared to the hta86, 400rpm, 600, 1000rpm?
Well, Devin said this new 'super94' spooled faster than a regular 3794.....that is less than 1000rpm slower spool than an HTA86. So let's play bench racer and say 600-800rpm??
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 02:15 PM
  #146  
Migsubishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 13
From: Tampa bay area
Originally Posted by GotWheelHop
Well, Devin said this new 'super94' spooled faster than a regular 3794.....that is less than 1000rpm slower spool than an HTA86. So let's play bench racer and say 600-800rpm??
I guess the question I really have FP might not be able to answer, Is this laggier than a 6466? If not I will wait for the results of this one, if it is then the obvious, and yes I know the questioned marked turbo will make more power.
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 03:23 PM
  #147  
MrLith's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 715
Likes: 17
From: Welly NZ
I would totally expect this to be laggier than the PT6466 as it clearly has a larger compressor wheel, it'd be pretty amazing if it wasn't - baring in mind the old 3794 was laggier than the 6766. At the same time it makes it seem like lbmin/lbmin it will probably be the next logical step up from the 6466.
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 04:00 PM
  #148  
Migsubishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 13
From: Tampa bay area
Originally Posted by MrLith
I would totally expect this to be laggier than the PT6466 as it clearly has a larger compressor wheel, it'd be pretty amazing if it wasn't - baring in mind the old 3794 was laggier than the 6766. At the same time it makes it seem like lbmin/lbmin it will probably be the next logical step up from the 6466.
Very logical response, thanks for your input, guess my next step up will be the 6466.
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 04:05 PM
  #149  
MrLith's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 715
Likes: 17
From: Welly NZ
It is purely speculative of course, we've not seen any results at all beyond a comment from Devin saying it appears to spool better than the 6766 even. I doubt (or hope?) that it will be long before he has results to share, probably wouldn't hurt to check out how they look before ordering anything.
Reply
Old May 7, 2013 | 04:44 PM
  #150  
JustinOlson's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon
Excited for results. Here is a pic of that EG33 BRZ engine...




Last edited by JustinOlson; May 7, 2013 at 05:03 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:18 AM.