Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Evo IX / BBK Full / E60

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 03:29 AM
  #1  
R. Mutt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 264
Likes: 6
From: Vancouver, BC
Evo IX / BBK Full / E60

Smoothing 6
Evo IX / BBK Full / E60-uwktdks.jpg
Smoothing 3
Evo IX / BBK Full / E60-csiu3sn.jpg


Stock block
Stock head
Stock Intake Manifold+TB
BBK Full
HKS 274/278 mivec cams
Perrin Intake
Perrin 3port EBCS
Omni 4bar MAP sensor
FIC 1100cc high-Z
Fuel Lab Mini FPR + Pressure Gauge
Radium Fuel Rail + Pressure Gauge
Walbro 416 lph fuel pump (modded+hardwired)
Mil-Spec throttle body seals
ETS 4" Intercooler
ETS 2.5" Titanium short route piping
ETS Mini Battery
Tial QR Blowoff Valve
Sparktech non-cdi Pro
Toxicfab v3 stock replacement manifold (Ceramic Coated)
MAP O2 eliminator (recirculated, vband, 3D contoured flange option)
STM resonated test pipe
Tomei Expreme Ti cat-back exhaust

Notes
It's a little lean between 4500-5500rpm. I plan to richen it up a bit more to get it in the 11.8:1 range.
Kept the torque below 400ft-lb to protect the rods
Highest IDC hit is 75%
Boost is 28psi tapering to 25psi
I'm hitting 4* at peak load and ramping up to 18* by 7500rpm
My car weighed at the track with a half tank is 3425lbs. I currently have my winter wheels/tires on and the logs were done with 3/4 tank.
On 91 octane pump gas + e10 tune the car did 380/318 mustang.

My car is a daily driver and reliability is key for me hence the flat torque below 400 ft-lb. This is my first tune on the car since switching to ethanol. I plan to go higher content in the future but I'm pretty happy with the tune for now. Future plans include an English Racing budget 2.0 (Wiseco HD 9.0:1 with R&R I beams etc), Kiggly Beehives, springs and Ti retainers, Kiggly HLA and GSC S2 cams and a 25psi Turbosmart wga.

Evo IX / BBK Full / E60-qhgdvne.jpg
Evo IX / BBK Full / E60-xcbsdce.jpg
Evo IX / BBK Full / E60-vzlghgs.jpg
Evo IX / BBK Full / E60-mut6m21.jpg
Attached Thumbnails Evo IX / BBK Full / E60-image.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 03:47 AM
  #2  
e_kobz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 99
From: Queen Creek, AZ
Awesome numbers. Can't wait to see what S2's will do.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 07:58 AM
  #3  
vmrevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 16
From: Huntsville, AL
great looking car and nice numbers
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 01:05 PM
  #4  
evo8426's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,248
Likes: 9
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
looks good but is quite a bit inflated from 6200 and up
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 01:27 PM
  #5  
Go_Lancer_Go's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, Alberta CANADA
Soooooo Jelllllyyyyyy!!!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 01:27 PM
  #6  
R. Mutt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 264
Likes: 6
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by evo8426
looks good but is quite a bit inflated from 6200 and up
What makes you think the numbers are inflated from 6200 up? A smoothing of 3 vs 6 shows difference of 11hp or 2%
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 01:33 PM
  #7  
evo8426's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,248
Likes: 9
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
The shape of it, it dramatically increases from that point on. Your torque also begins to actually go up from 6000 instead of down or leveling out. My guess would be around 470-475 whp based on years of using the program.

Last edited by evo8426; Jan 12, 2015 at 01:35 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 02:08 PM
  #8  
R. Mutt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 264
Likes: 6
From: Vancouver, BC
Fair enough...I'll post my graph when I get it on the roller. Keep in mind I only have access to a Mustang. So if I do the conversion in VD it should be around 445/335. I myself found it surprising but I did a number of runs and I consistently got around 500whp. Likewise my VD and Mustang numbers have always been very close in reality. At the end of the day I just want to hit mid 11s reliably...a number is a number.

At the same measure, my car isn't speed density but bbk fulls have done 500/450 or thereabout.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...oke-tuned.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...0hp-450tq.html

Last edited by R. Mutt; Jan 12, 2015 at 02:13 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 02:17 PM
  #9  
evo8426's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,248
Likes: 9
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
Yeah I'm not knocking the car at all, I know that it is for sure a fast car and is making really good numbers for only 25psi up top.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 02:23 PM
  #10  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Yea, they do 500 on E85, that a significant difference in fuel. Its definitely weird how your torque holds flat. You can see on the 2 cars you referenced that the torques tapers off, and yours doesn't. Good results either way, even if they do turn out to be high. I want a bbk full or B, but picked up a 71hta recently. Couldn't pass it up for the price.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 02:27 PM
  #11  
droppinbottom's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi Texas
Probably right at 440 +/- dynojet on this setup. It is very similar to my old setup and I was right at 420 but I didn't have the manifold you are using. Either way it should be able to get you 11.5-6 at the track.

Talk to mychailo about his old setup as he is the only one I know that has made 500 on a bbk full but he had done so many little tweaks to get it there.

Car looks great by the way. I seem to remember this car making around 1k whp a little while back. Least that's what the internet said.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 02:31 PM
  #12  
R. Mutt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 264
Likes: 6
From: Vancouver, BC
Thanks for the feedback guys. I've been in communication with Mychailo and SD certainly contributes but I've never tuned SD so I'll have to read up quite a bit before I feel comfortable making the transition. I can't deny that it is strange the tq doesn't fall off as per a usual graph. We'll see how things unfold in the coming weeks.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2015 | 02:35 PM
  #13  
R. Mutt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 264
Likes: 6
From: Vancouver, BC
Originally Posted by droppinbottom

Car looks great by the way. I seem to remember this car making around 1k whp a little while back. Least that's what the internet said.
The photographer had some photoshop fun in the hunt for likes, shares etc
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2015 | 03:25 PM
  #14  
Go_Lancer_Go's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, Alberta CANADA
when you gonna build
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2015 | 01:54 PM
  #15  
cerevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 497
Likes: 12
From: Kentucky
Subscribed for GSC S2, and MD results
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Anarchy99
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
9
Nov 28, 2012 12:11 PM
cobb-sti
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
6
Feb 20, 2012 10:06 AM
Gary@MellonRacing
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
56
Jun 30, 2011 10:54 AM
dmotors
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
1
May 9, 2011 10:38 AM
dmotors
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
2
May 9, 2011 08:27 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:13 AM.