Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

More power for 2003 evo

Old Nov 17, 2004 | 09:22 AM
  #16  
AMS97EclipseGSX's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Originally Posted by Ted B
I don't have the boost chart handy, but both A/F and boost were logged, and AFAIK, there were no leaks. To the best of my recollection, the boost peaked at 23psi and tapered from there (as expected with the factory turbo).
Ours started at 26 psi and fell to 22 psi. It held 22 psi though. You might want to check the car for a boost leak. It might have a small one which would hurt the performance.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 09:26 AM
  #17  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
The data I've seen for at least one car running ~350whp shows injector duty not reaching the practical limit (85%) until around that power level, with comparable A/F. Perhaps certain, lesser devices do not report accurately.

In any case, I do not recall noting to this point any engines with the factory turbo experiencing any fuel delivery problems with the factory injectors.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 09:36 AM
  #18  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Intercooler aside injectors can make a big difference on a stock turbo'd car. I have seen three cases where a customer has brought the car in and was hitting fuel cut with the colder weather here. after putting in some larger 680 cc injectors and retuning the car the fuel cut problem went away. our stages were mapped out with true to life Dyno numbers. We would never recomend a part to a customer that was not necessary. Thats just bad buisness.

Eric
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 09:58 AM
  #19  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports
I have seen three cases where a customer has brought the car in and was hitting fuel cut with the colder weather here. after putting in some larger 680 cc injectors and retuning the car the fuel cut problem went away.
Fuel cut is initiated by the ECU in response to a MAF signal, and is not indicative of a deficiency with the factory injectors. In this case, using larger injectors necessitated a global adjustment to the MAF signal to get around the fuel cut issue, and therefore this instance is out of context where injector capacity is concerned.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:10 AM
  #20  
hkfeet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Wow this thread got big fast overnight, thanks for everyone input. Anything else I can do that can be somewhat "plug and play" for extra power?

BTW, hello eric
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:17 AM
  #21  
hkfeet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Yes I believe I have read many things about the power loss from using a aftermarket intake vs stock intake. Thats why my hks suction is just hanging aroud in my room. Maybe I should just sell it and just keep using my currently stock one with the k&n drop in?

So what do you recommend. A reflash then I go get the super-afc2, mbc or ebc, and get it tuned then?

Originally Posted by Ted B
Some of things I read in these threads are just ridiculous.

You don't need a larger IC...unless you are going to a bigger turbo.

You don't need larger injectors...unless you are going to a bigger turbo.

You don't need head studs...unless you're running higher (e.g. >24psi) boost pressures - and you won't be.

You don't need just about anything in Ang Wen Yan's post.

If you want more power and likewise want to keep it discreet, here's what you should consider...

3" turbo-back exhaust setup. The larger cat and cat-back alone are not enough to get everything you can from the exhaust. Whether you do it half-way or all the way should make no difference to the dealer, and since you cannot hide any of it, you may as well do ALL of it. I've not heard of a dealer attempting to negate warranty work on the count of an exhaust system.

The 255lph fuel pump is worthwhile, inexpensive, and fixes the only weak link in the fueling system. With this, your fueling system is good for a hypothetical 350whp or so.

Don't expect much from the aftermarket intake. The factory intake is not a restriction, and there are cars running 11sec E.T.'s with it.

The safc and MBC are ok if you like fiddling with it, but adhere to what Corey said above...without a means of recalibrating certain pertinent issues in the ECU, you will be limited. A reflash is invisible to the dealer, but not to the dyno.

Finally, another 'invisible' mod that is worthwhile would be HKS 264 cams. The car will idle like stock, but can pick up quite a bit of power with proper tuning (e.g. reflash).
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:19 AM
  #22  
Kwman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington NC/ Carolina Beach
Corey said it best, throw in some injectors and you've got yourself a great machine. Plus you haven't spent that much money for the amount of power you'll get from those mods.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:37 AM
  #23  
AMS97EclipseGSX's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Heights, IL
www.automotosports.com/images/EVOstageII_1.jpg
www.automotosports.com/images/EVOstageII_2.jpg

Read these 2 pages about our FMIC. It also proves that a bigger FMIC w/ the stock turbo can make more power.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:41 AM
  #24  
hkfeet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Hey micah I wrote you an email.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:52 AM
  #25  
DaWorstPlaya's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,216
Likes: 7
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by Ted B
Yes, our Malaysian friend Ang Wen Yan's post reads like a Christmas wishlist gone insane. I suspect he was foaming at the mouth as he typed it.
LOL! ... nice ... though it is impressive that a 10 year old knows this
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:57 AM
  #26  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by hkfeet
Yes I believe I have read many things about the power loss from using a aftermarket intake vs stock intake. Thats why my hks suction is just hanging aroud in my room. Maybe I should just sell it and just keep using my currently stock one with the k&n drop in?

So what do you recommend. A reflash then I go get the super-afc2, mbc or ebc, and get it tuned then?
If you're not afraid to turn a few screws yourself and want to keep costs down, a reflash, mbc, and safc (to tweak A/F) will allow enough control to get you to the 300whp mark with an aftermarket 3" turboback exhaust. There are those with similar setups who could guide you in turning the safc. A set of HKS 264 cams would be a next logical step, and can get you a decent bit more power with proper tuning.

If your long range plans are greater, it would be to your benefit to forget about the mbc and safc in favor of dyno tuning and something like an Xede, but that is up to your eventual goals.

As for the HKS intake, if it's an issue of money, you can do without it. Aftermarket intakes tend to be at least 85% bling factor.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 11:07 AM
  #27  
propellerhead's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: Agrestic
Originally Posted by Ted B
The data I've seen for at least one car running ~350whp shows injector duty not reaching the practical limit (85%) until around that power level, with comparable A/F. Perhaps certain, lesser devices do not report accurately.

In any case, I do not recall noting to this point any engines with the factory turbo experiencing any fuel delivery problems with the factory injectors.
No doubt proper measurement is necessary before jumping to conclusions. I certainly wouldn't rely on ODB-II with it's lousy sampling rates. In my case I am directly sampling injector pulse width being fed to the injector using a fairly sophisticated DSP and calculating duty cycle based on RPM. I'm confident with the accuracy. I've got the logs to demonstrate the measurements for anyone interested.

With my current aftermarket turbo tuned to 11.2-11.5 AFR, running 680cc/min injectors and a Walbro 225lph fuel pump, I'm seeing 70-75% IDCs. This car recently dyno'd 350WHP on a Dynojet. Take it for what it's worth.

I've argued this point before. I certainly don't feel like a fool advising someone to upgrade their injectors at the proposed mod levels, especially if this person even remotely contemplates taking their car to the track, dumping in some C16 or 100octane fuel and cranking the boost up to 23-24psi. Any margin of safety you once enjoyed with the stock injectors has now evaporated under these operating conditions.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 11:17 AM
  #28  
hkfeet's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Yea Im not into bling or rice. The stock intake looks good imo anyways. In fact I am going to look for a 02-03 lancer trunk at some junkyards today to replace my trunk. I know the wing is tradition, but I would like to take it off and see if I can get less attention with the car.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 11:23 AM
  #29  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by propellerhead
I certainly don't feel like a fool advising someone to upgrade their injectors at the proposed mod levels...
Well, that's just it. In this case, we are talking about someone who is not even contemplating mods that approach this level, and therefore even if your data proves to be accurate, the argument is still relatively moot at this point in time. This being the case, I hardly find it necessary to advise an injector upgrade when we are talking about mild bolt-ons.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 12:09 PM
  #30  
propellerhead's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: Agrestic
Originally Posted by Ted B
Well, that's just it. In this case, we are talking about someone who is not even contemplating mods that approach this level, and therefore even if your data proves to be accurate, the argument is still relatively moot at this point in time.
I'm sorry. I didn't see any post where a visit to the track was ruled out. In fact, I've seen mention of elapsed times in at least one of the posts which indicates to me some contemplation of track time. Regardless, this guy needs to sit down and careully think about what he thinks he's going to use the car for in the future.

I still stand by my statment that a turbo upgrade is not the only criteria for considering upgraded injectors. I'm not casting fear, uncertainty and doubt here. I'm just relaying my own personal observations in regards to IDCs. I have no stake in what he buys for upgrades.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:58 AM.