Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Buschur Racing dyno thread.....new developments.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 08:36 AM
  #451  
smackdaddy's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: NE PA
I'd love to hear more about the gt35r car... I think you've outlined the setup on the RS in other threads. But, no one asked me for my opinion, so I'll let Kazz answer for himself
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #452  
EVOMIZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 1
From: CT
have you tested just the throttle body ?
any gains or its useless without a sheet metal manifold?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 09:09 AM
  #453  
NYREDEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
From: Westchester NY
Dave...2 questions....

What kind of clutch is the 624 car running? YOu said he is using everything from you guys...what does that include? A stage 1-4 and the 580? Or more?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 02:09 PM
  #454  
KazzEvo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 2
From: Illinois
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Kazz,

Which "beast" would you like me to sum up? The RS stock turbo car or the GT35R car?

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
The GT35R - that's where ya lost me ... *Laugh*

Thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #455  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
The 624 whp car is using a RPS, I am not thrilled with it on start up as the starter drags horribly and sounds like crap. Other than that it seems good so far. We don't launch customers cars so I don't know how it would hold up to a hard launch. 27 dyno pulls and some hard 3rd gear pulls and it is fine so far.

Our 65mm throttle body made 3-5 whp throughout the RPM range and smoothed out some dips in the graph. Matched to a stock intake that has been ported to take advantage of the 65 mm TB it picked up 8-10 whp throughout the RPM range.

The car that made 624 whp and 576 ft lbs has our complete Stage 4, 1,000 cc injectors, AEM EMS, BR Stg 3 stroker engine (2.25 L), BR Stg 3 cylinder head, our downpipe and offroad pipe, some other make catback and our GT35R turbo kit.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 01:33 PM
  #456  
Want to Evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: The OC
anything new?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 02:31 PM
  #457  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 8
From: not here
did you ever get that ebay manifold?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #458  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
I was supposed to send a JIC manifold and DNP o2 housing, I had a family emergency that kept me a little too distracted to stay on top of things, it looks like I won't be working on my car for quite a while..
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2005 | 09:48 PM
  #459  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Hope everything is alright!


That thing we discussed has gone no where with the manufacturer...
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 07:13 AM
  #460  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Compilation of Dave Buschur's posts in this thread

I put together an MS Word file that has all of the posts by David in this thread relating to dyno results on the RS. It takes so long to read a thread this long with all of the side questions that I thought this would be helpful for those who want to focus on the actual dyno results. All of the flavor, none of the fat

Remarkably, even this condensed version is 41 pages!! But it's a good read, even if you've been here every step of the way. The amount of time that David has put into this becomes obvious when you look at it this way. But it does pay off. I've already bought several hundred dollars worth of your parts based solely on this thread and plan to buy more this season based on your findings.

Thanks again, David!

(See attached file)

--RichJ
Attached Files

Last edited by EVO8LTW; Mar 6, 2005 at 07:33 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 07:45 AM
  #461  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Magnaflow vs. Buschur muffler results

David,

A follow-up question. In post #92 on December 13th, you wrote:
I did do a test on the Magnaflow muffler VS. the Buschur Racing lightweight muffler. I honestly thought in the back of my head that the Magnaflow would outflow our muffler, that's not what happened. Two runs back-to-back, one was 6 whp less the other was 10 whp less. The full 3" offroad system with our lightweight muffler made the same HP as an open exhaust on the car and did it with less boost, THAT was a shocker.
Then, the next day in post #103, you wrote:
*On a full Stage 1 car making 314.9 whp (w/Magnaflow muffler) we switched it to our lightweight muffler, gains were minimal with HP going up to 316 whp.
Could you please clarify which is correct? I have your turboback on my car and actually own both mufflers for it. I was going to sell off the lightweight one, but if it's worth 6-10 whp over the Magnaflow, I'll keep it for race days.

Thanks,
RichJ
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #462  
Evo spooling's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola
Originally Posted by EVO8LTW
I put together an MS Word file that has all of the posts by David in this thread relating to dyno results on the RS. It takes so long to read a thread this long with all of the side questions that I thought this would be helpful for those who want to focus on the actual dyno results. All of the flavor, none of the fat

Remarkably, even this condensed version is 41 pages!! But it's a good read, even if you've been here every step of the way. The amount of time that David has put into this becomes obvious when you look at it this way. But it does pay off. I've already bought several hundred dollars worth of your parts based solely on this thread and plan to buy more this season based on your findings.

Thanks again, David!

(See attached file)

--RichJ
Recommend to the mods that this file is made into a sticky.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 10:20 AM
  #463  
Want to Evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: The OC
Originally Posted by EVO8LTW
David,

A follow-up question. In post #92 on December 13th, you wrote:
I did do a test on the Magnaflow muffler VS. the Buschur Racing lightweight muffler. I honestly thought in the back of my head that the Magnaflow would outflow our muffler, that's not what happened. Two runs back-to-back, one was 6 whp less the other was 10 whp less. The full 3" offroad system with our lightweight muffler made the same HP as an open exhaust on the car and did it with less boost, THAT was a shocker.
Then, the next day in post #103, you wrote:
*On a full Stage 1 car making 314.9 whp (w/Magnaflow muffler) we switched it to our lightweight muffler, gains were minimal with HP going up to 316 whp.
Could you please clarify which is correct? I have your turboback on my car and actually own both mufflers for it. I was going to sell off the lightweight one, but if it's worth 6-10 whp over the Magnaflow, I'll keep it for race days.

Thanks,
RichJ

I would guess that it was mid range hp. but that is just a guess.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 12:02 PM
  #464  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Nothing new right now. Going to do more testing on the RS this week. Have some interesting things coming up on that car again.

I never got the e-bay manifold, I have never bid on anything on there before. The next day I got a notification that something went wrong with my bid. I said the hell with it at that point. There were a few guys that offered to send valve springs, FMIC's and manifolds/02 housings here for me to test. Nothing ever showed up except a set of valve springs from Revolver.

I'm not interested in doing the testing on those other parts anymore. The car is going back on the dyno for a few more parts I need to test and then it is going together for some upcoming races.

I would guess at this point that the differences in the Magnaflow VS our lightweight muffler on the first test must have been midrange too. The dyno files were all lost last week when the hard drive crashed. In my notes dyno run #43 was with our full 3" and lightweight BR muffler, power was 316. On run # 42 with the Magnaflow it was 314. It's a small gain either way.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 07:00 PM
  #465  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
There were a few guys that offered to send valve springs, FMIC's and manifolds/02 housings here for me to test. Nothing ever showed up except a set of valve springs from Revolver.

I'm not interested in doing the testing on those other parts anymore. The car is going back on the dyno for a few more parts I need to test and then it is going together for some upcoming races.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
So are you still going to test the parts you did get?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:09 PM.