Any damage to stock valvetrain
How difficult is it to change the valvesprings with the head on the car. I've done valvesprings before on a Chevy V8 on the car. Is it similar? Can you use one of these?

If that sort of tool doesn't work, what do you need to change them on the car. Thanks.
If that sort of tool doesn't work, what do you need to change them on the car. Thanks.
Again.........
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I'm back......
I was right.......
We pulled the spring out and measured from the valve tip to the top of the seal then pulled the valve back out and marked it for the top of the seal. The retainer and keepers were then put back on the valve and the distance was measured. .471 That is more room than the HKS cams need even taking into consideration the rocker arm ratio. If memory serves me right the rocker arm ratio will bring the lift at the valve up to about .446.
For those of you that doubted me, no apology needed.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
I was right.......
We pulled the spring out and measured from the valve tip to the top of the seal then pulled the valve back out and marked it for the top of the seal. The retainer and keepers were then put back on the valve and the distance was measured. .471 That is more room than the HKS cams need even taking into consideration the rocker arm ratio. If memory serves me right the rocker arm ratio will bring the lift at the valve up to about .446.
For those of you that doubted me, no apology needed.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
First we measure the length of exposed valvestem from the valveseal to the tip with valve in closed position (as shown below) 24.42mm
then we subtract the length from tip to the bottom of the retainer 14.27mm
what we are left with is 10.15mm of useable valve travel before the retainer will contact the seal.
for reference........ HKS cams have how much valvelift?
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Oh, the HKS 280 cams are the same lift also, 10.8/10.2 as the others, just duration changed.
Jason, Beau and the whole Revolver team
Originally Posted by EVO8LTW
How difficult is it to change the valvesprings with the head on the car. I've done valvesprings before on a Chevy V8 on the car. Is it similar? Can you use one of these?

If that sort of tool doesn't work, what do you need to change them on the car. Thanks.
If that sort of tool doesn't work, what do you need to change them on the car. Thanks.
this is the one we use click me
nice and easy - with plenty of room for tweezers and magnets (for the keepers)
ogvw,
for all the calculations .. seems like your measurements also doesn't stand for stock cams .. since at 10mm lift with a rocker ratio > 1:1 .. it stands to reason that stock cams will also exceed 10.15mm (your measurements)..
Care to comment on this ??
for all the calculations .. seems like your measurements also doesn't stand for stock cams .. since at 10mm lift with a rocker ratio > 1:1 .. it stands to reason that stock cams will also exceed 10.15mm (your measurements)..
Care to comment on this ??
ogvw,
Nice to see you and I can have an intelligent conversation here.
I see how you measured it, which is basically what I outlined above. Difference was we measure the tip to seal and then pulled the valve and marked the stem. Then installed the retainer/keepers and measured the difference. We came up with .471 and you come up with .399. As we all know that isn't even enough for the stock cams to work as stock lift is .393 plus the rocker arm ratio which easily will take it over .400. In your theory you are telling us that Mitsubishi themselves are assembling and building these heads with a retainer to seal contact problem. I don't believe that. Something else is wrong with the head you are taking measurements on.
Looking at the picture you posted the valve itself does not look like it has ever been machined properly. Has anyone there checked the installed height of the valve? There is a spec for the spring seat to valve tip height, if your valve stem hasn't been machined on the tip end yet for installed height this could throw off what you are trying to do. Most of the heads that come through here from other shops have never had this done and it is critical. it is something we do on every single head that is done here.
The .072 difference in what you are measuring and what we are measuring is the problem and we are both measuring the same way basically. We just need to find what the difference is.
As you all know I will admit it if I am wrong and I am not liar. I don't believe ogvw is a liar either, as he is showing proof of what they are saying. Something is up with the head/valve though as there is no way Mitsu is putting these heads together from the factory with a clearance problem, agreed?
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Nice to see you and I can have an intelligent conversation here.
I see how you measured it, which is basically what I outlined above. Difference was we measure the tip to seal and then pulled the valve and marked the stem. Then installed the retainer/keepers and measured the difference. We came up with .471 and you come up with .399. As we all know that isn't even enough for the stock cams to work as stock lift is .393 plus the rocker arm ratio which easily will take it over .400. In your theory you are telling us that Mitsubishi themselves are assembling and building these heads with a retainer to seal contact problem. I don't believe that. Something else is wrong with the head you are taking measurements on.
Looking at the picture you posted the valve itself does not look like it has ever been machined properly. Has anyone there checked the installed height of the valve? There is a spec for the spring seat to valve tip height, if your valve stem hasn't been machined on the tip end yet for installed height this could throw off what you are trying to do. Most of the heads that come through here from other shops have never had this done and it is critical. it is something we do on every single head that is done here.
The .072 difference in what you are measuring and what we are measuring is the problem and we are both measuring the same way basically. We just need to find what the difference is.
As you all know I will admit it if I am wrong and I am not liar. I don't believe ogvw is a liar either, as he is showing proof of what they are saying. Something is up with the head/valve though as there is no way Mitsu is putting these heads together from the factory with a clearance problem, agreed?
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Originally Posted by gunzo
ogvw,
for all the calculations .. seems like your measurements also doesn't stand for stock cams .. since at 10mm lift with a rocker ratio > 1:1 .. it stands to reason that stock cams will also exceed 10.15mm (your measurements)..
Care to comment on this ??
for all the calculations .. seems like your measurements also doesn't stand for stock cams .. since at 10mm lift with a rocker ratio > 1:1 .. it stands to reason that stock cams will also exceed 10.15mm (your measurements)..
Care to comment on this ??
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
ogvw,
Nice to see you and I can have an intelligent conversation here.
I see how you measured it, which is basically what I outlined above. Difference was we measure the tip to seal and then pulled the valve and marked the stem. Then installed the retainer/keepers and measured the difference. We came up with .471 and you come up with .399.
Nice to see you and I can have an intelligent conversation here.
I see how you measured it, which is basically what I outlined above. Difference was we measure the tip to seal and then pulled the valve and marked the stem. Then installed the retainer/keepers and measured the difference. We came up with .471 and you come up with .399.
Originally Posted by davidbuscher
As we all know that isn't even enough for the stock cams to work as stock lift is .393 plus the rocker arm ratio which easily will take it over .400.
to figure out the actual lift on the cam you DIVIDE valve lift by 1.7..... giving you 5.88 mm for the actual lift on the cam. Go ahead, try it - first measure the base cirsle of the cam (smallest OD) then measure from the tip of the "nose" on the cam to the bottom of the "heel" - subtract these two numbers and that gives you the cam lift, multiply these by 1.7 and that gives you lift at the valve. It is quite simple really.....
Originally Posted by davidbuscher
In your theory you are telling us that Mitsubishi themselves are assembling and building these heads with a retainer to seal contact problem. I don't believe that.
sends them out. As I have said before this head is completely stock and low mileage. I have tested and measured at least 5 different heads off the car and many many more on the car - ALL WERE THE SAME.
Originally Posted by davidbuscher
Looking at the picture you posted the valve itself does not look like it has ever been machined properly. Has anyone there checked the installed height of the valve?
Originally Posted by davidbuscher
As you all know I will admit it if I am wrong and I am not liar. I don't believe ogvw is a liar either, as he is showing proof of what they are saying. Something is up with the head/valve though as there is no way Mitsu is putting these heads together from the factory with a clearance problem, agreed?
David please understand that this has nothing to do with you or your shop, hell even HKS says its ok. The simple fact is that they must have neglected to check for it. We do this for a living, so we HAVE to make SURE that there will be no problems by checking and double checking our measurements as I have proven by taking pictures of the whole process. Please feel free to PM or call me with any questions - Id love to get you guys on board with some of our products.
Jason
Originally Posted by Terry S
A bit off topic, but Jason, do you guys sell the springs/retainers separatly or only as a package with your cams?
Thanks,
Terry S
Thanks,
Terry S
I believe ZEUS is organizing a discount purchase, PM him for details
Thanks
Jason
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
ogvw,
In your theory you are telling us that Mitsubishi themselves are assembling and building these heads with a retainer to seal contact problem. I don't believe that. Something else is wrong with the head you are taking measurements on.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
In your theory you are telling us that Mitsubishi themselves are assembling and building these heads with a retainer to seal contact problem. I don't believe that. Something else is wrong with the head you are taking measurements on.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Am I off base?
PS---We just wrapped up our HKS 264/272 cam install on a client's EVO, also using Revolver's springs and steel retainers(sent to us via next day air because of the information Revolver has brought forth in this post). Everything installed like a gem(first time we've done springs in an EVO but it was cake). Now our client is glad he waited the extra day for the Revolver goods--no headaches for down the road.
Originally Posted by NYREDEVO
So you can use the revolver springs & retainers in combination with the HKS Cams?? This is good. What does a set of spring/retainers go for? i did not see it on your site
Here is pricing;
Revolver high rev single spring set(set of 16) and steel retainers for EVO8;
$249
LMK if I can help at all.
Best,
Jeremy
You are correct about lift at the valve, I realized it after I typed the above paragraph and called the machine shop to verify. The intake valve on the HKS cams is the higher of the two lifts and measures .424 lift, at the valve.
Regardless, we came up with .471 from the bottom of the stock retainer to the top of the seal.
Not sure what the differences are or why we are coming up with two different things.....
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Regardless, we came up with .471 from the bottom of the stock retainer to the top of the seal.
Not sure what the differences are or why we are coming up with two different things.....
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Originally Posted by ogvw
We sell them seperately also......
I believe ZEUS is organizing a discount purchase, PM him for details
Thanks
Jason
I believe ZEUS is organizing a discount purchase, PM him for details
Thanks
Jason
I'm still waiting for my vendor packet from Mark before I will attempt to make any money.
Last edited by Zeus; Feb 8, 2005 at 10:28 AM.






