very similar results with my 264in/272ex setup, almost same story with the 272in/264ex setup, nice numbers!

 

Hey man, while you have nice numbers, that Dynojet reads about 10% higher HP and inflates the torque number compared to the Mustang I dyno on, just FYI. The numbers aren't quite as close as they look but that might be expected.

 

Sorry if this was posted earlier, but what kind of power gains did you see with these over the hks cams? thanks

 

Hey guys, I've got my GSC 272 i/727 e cams sitting in my room waiting to be installed. Unfortunately ive got a crapload more things that need to be installed as well (check out my sig), so it may take a little bit cause i need to save up some $$$. Anyways, im gonna get a custom dyno tune on my UTEC after everything is installed and ill try to post some dyno charts if i can. Anyways, those numbers look awesome and im really excited to see how my car is gonna perform after the cams!

 

Just a friendly reminder...

 

I went from 264/264 HKS cams to GSC 272/264 cams and gained 15 WHP and actually picked up a couple ft lbs as well.

And yes, yes, I will get a sound clip. Sorry! I've been super busy. ASAP ASAP!!

 

They put up some great numbers! The GSC's definatly look like a great alternative to some of the other brands out there. I had a great time seeing everyone and I really enjoyed meeting Mark from TT, he is a pretty cool down to earth guy, very easy to get along with. Anyway, just take a look at the results in regaurds to the GSC cams.......

 

evotexas , seems like u have alot less torque, is it because of 264 ex?
i think 264in/272ex set up has more torque.

 

have 272in/264ex here going in with new clutch and dyno tune this weekend...will post results..

 

Yeah, but they are impressive numbers nonetheless. If I had those numbers I could tell others the impressive numbers I was making, regardless of the dyno. Besides I'd rather go on an AWD dynojet anyway. An Evo is not a Mustang, and it is not rear wheel drive.

 

Reguardless, EVOTEXAS still has nice numbers, and both combos are great in my eyes.

 

A 727 exhaust cam...is that possible? That would be a long duration. I would think the highest would be 360. Anything greater than that and the cam would be just making another spin.

 

its a typo definatly he ment 272/272

 

^^^ I know, just bustin' his chops! I am sure your statement has some typos also.

 

riiiiiiiiiiight sure ya were!