Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Sad day

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 07:41 PM
  #31  
Sean@Iveytune's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: Linden, NJ
Originally Posted by Kbp2025
Sorry this question might be stupid, but that's how you learn...What exactly does neck down mean, and does the RS-R have it?(please say no, I already have it on my evo)
To your point, the neck down of cross sectional area anywhere in the exhaust system isnt a good idea.
If you havea full 3" exhaust and it necks down anywhere even for an inch of the run it can cause your HP output to be compromised. Alot of people take exhaust flow for granted but it is important.

Sean
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 07:48 PM
  #32  
WHTEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
From: COLORADO
when they say neck down they mean that at the flange it is say 2.5" then it goes to 3". so basically if your running a 3" downpipe and test pipe then you run a catback that reduces to 2.5 them goes back to 3 it just restricts the flow.

don't know which rs-r you have but i have the ex mag gt2 and it does not neck down. full 3" and one bend.

that magnaflow is way overpriced. i think they're ti one is like 1200 bucks and to have it neck down like that is a waste.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 07:56 PM
  #33  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Fourdoor
As anyone who has met Al in person can attest, I think he can loose the same 4 lbs off his body for a lot less money then buying a Ti exhaust

Don't get upset Al, this is from one fat *** to another Heck, I loose 4 lbs when I take a good dump

Keith
That is the easiest place for me to loose weight for sure. sadly I spent 10 hours this weekend working on the car to shave 6 lbs off the car. A waste of time
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 08:04 PM
  #34  
purecoda's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MD
Originally Posted by dolemite45
I heard the Magnaflows are made by JIC...they look practically the same!

I've heard very mixed opinions about the JIC products, but Magnaflow does have a superior warranty.

I've heard from a few sources that Titanium really isn't the best for turbo back exhausts because it's a brittle metal that won't take too well to heat and will break welds quicker than stainless or even mild steel.

Any truth to this? Any full Ti exhaust owners out there been using the same system for a long time?
just an FYI, but whoever told you all that about titanium knows nothing about it. one thing that metal is most definitely not is brittle. in fact think total opposite of that. it has amazing fatigue resistance.

EDIT: i left my statement above the same, but just double checked my sources. i don't know why i blanked on this, but titanium does indeed form "brittle compounds" when being welded to disimilar metals. so as long as that thing's fully ti, all the pros of ti should be there (including great flexibility). http://www.azom.com/Details.asp?ArticleID=1245 my source


on another note does anyone else not really like the blue tip? i mean i know its a great way to tell everyone that at least the tip is titanium, but i think bare ti is much cleaner and sexier.

Last edited by purecoda; Mar 28, 2005 at 08:07 PM. Reason: fact check
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #35  
bolsen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by Evo Police
Figures, it's an American company, making a exhaust for a Japanese car.
I wish they had an award for dumbest post of the day... you could be a winnAr!

Sorry to get OT, but ingnorance like this just drives me nuts
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 07:34 AM
  #36  
Big Bald's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Hamden, Connecticut 06514
I remember one time I went to E-Town in November of 04. When i got there, i forgot to remove the slincer in my Apexi GT exhaust. I made the run down the track and ran a 13.7 i believe. When i finished, I immediately pulled the silencer out of the car and made no other changes. I pulled the exact same 1.8 60' and ran a 13.1. That should give you some sort of idea of how Necking Down would effect performance. The timeslips were basically identical, the only significant change was the silencer. I know that is alittle more dramatic but the same effects apply.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 07:43 AM
  #37  
evo 8 ya's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 1
From: 39.800N 76.983W
Greddy Ti. It necks down to 76mm or 3" The rest of the piping is 80mm or 3.15"
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 07:51 AM
  #38  
EVIL_EVO_VIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,111
Likes: 1
From: Lake Mary,FL
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
The neck down sucks, that's for sure. Typical catback exhaust. Weighs 12 pounds and costs how much Al? Ours is 16 pounds, no reducer in it and is only $450. Hell our exhaust has already made 667 whp on your car, isn't that good enough

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
So Dave, should i cut off the reducer in my catback and weld a 3inch flange? Is it worth it. I dont want to go through the hassle of selling my catback and getting a new one
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 08:15 AM
  #39  
calvin's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: myrtle beach
wow i can't believe nobody brought this up...Tuner Performance Magazine Test
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 08:27 AM
  #40  
EVIL_EVO_VIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,111
Likes: 1
From: Lake Mary,FL
Originally Posted by calvin
wow i can't believe nobody brought this up...Tuner Performance Magazine Test
Thanks for the info. As i was comparing the dyno numbers from Bushur racing catback and the Hks Hi-power, there was not a big difference at all . As you can see the dyo sheet

Bushur Racing catback
247hp-stock
263hp-with catback

Hks Hi-Power
247hp-stock
261hp-with Catback

There is NO 5-8whp difference like Al claims usually is the difference betweent exhausts. Its clearly shown on the dyno sheet.And another thing, the hks turbo kit has the hi-power catback, which has the reducer, then why does the kit make so much hp with that catback?

Last edited by EVIL_EVO_VIII; Mar 29, 2005 at 08:31 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 08:49 AM
  #41  
osunick's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
I'd like to see more of the testing methodology (i.e. how repeatable are the results) to see how statistically signficant these results are. There were a few stinkers in the pile who were in the 250 hp range.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 08:57 AM
  #42  
calvin's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: myrtle beach
i agree, i don't think they really say...if you look on that site there are also awesome write-ups for cams, grounding systems and others...(great for us amateurs)
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 09:13 AM
  #43  
gadsmevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Your moms house
Thanks for the info. As i was comparing the dyno numbers from Bushur racing catback and the Hks Hi-power, there was not a big difference at all . As you can see the dyo sheet

Bushur Racing catback
247hp-stock
263hp-with catback

Hks Hi-Power
247hp-stock
261hp-with Catback

There is NO 5-8whp difference like Al claims usually is the difference betweent exhausts. Its clearly shown on the dyno sheet.And another thing, the hks turbo kit has the hi-power catback, which has the reducer, then why does the kit make so much hp with that catback?
Was this done on the same dyno same day same car?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 10:01 AM
  #44  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Originally Posted by EVIL_EVO_VIII
Thanks for the info. As i was comparing the dyno numbers from Bushur racing catback and the Hks Hi-power, there was not a big difference at all . As you can see the dyo sheet

Bushur Racing catback
247hp-stock
263hp-with catback

Hks Hi-Power
247hp-stock
261hp-with Catback

There is NO 5-8whp difference like Al claims usually is the difference betweent exhausts. Its clearly shown on the dyno sheet.And another thing, the hks turbo kit has the hi-power catback, which has the reducer, then why does the kit make so much hp with that catback?
I think we are forgetting something here. The neck-down isnt really hurting in this comparison because this a a CATBACK TEST. They probably bolted the exhausts on with the stock cat/downpipe... What Al and David are saying is that when there is a full 3" exhaust then a 1inch neckdown then back to 3inch, its a restriction and yes it does effect power. Its simply physics.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 10:04 AM
  #45  
dohcvtec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
i have a helix cat back which is 3" all the way through, very cheap and sounds good too.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:14 AM.