Sad day
Originally Posted by Kbp2025
Sorry this question might be stupid, but that's how you learn...What exactly does neck down mean, and does the RS-R have it?(please say no, I already have it on my evo)
If you havea full 3" exhaust and it necks down anywhere even for an inch of the run it can cause your HP output to be compromised. Alot of people take exhaust flow for granted but it is important.
Sean
when they say neck down they mean that at the flange it is say 2.5" then it goes to 3". so basically if your running a 3" downpipe and test pipe then you run a catback that reduces to 2.5 them goes back to 3 it just restricts the flow.
don't know which rs-r you have but i have the ex mag gt2 and it does not neck down. full 3" and one bend.
that magnaflow is way overpriced. i think they're ti one is like 1200 bucks and to have it neck down like that is a waste.
don't know which rs-r you have but i have the ex mag gt2 and it does not neck down. full 3" and one bend.
that magnaflow is way overpriced. i think they're ti one is like 1200 bucks and to have it neck down like that is a waste.
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by Fourdoor
As anyone who has met Al in person can attest, I think he can loose the same 4 lbs off his body for a lot less money then buying a Ti exhaust
Don't get upset Al, this is from one fat *** to another
Heck, I loose 4 lbs when I take a good dump 
Keith
Don't get upset Al, this is from one fat *** to another
Heck, I loose 4 lbs when I take a good dump 
Keith
Originally Posted by dolemite45
I heard the Magnaflows are made by JIC...they look practically the same!
I've heard very mixed opinions about the JIC products, but Magnaflow does have a superior warranty.
I've heard from a few sources that Titanium really isn't the best for turbo back exhausts because it's a brittle metal that won't take too well to heat and will break welds quicker than stainless or even mild steel.
Any truth to this? Any full Ti exhaust owners out there been using the same system for a long time?
I've heard very mixed opinions about the JIC products, but Magnaflow does have a superior warranty.
I've heard from a few sources that Titanium really isn't the best for turbo back exhausts because it's a brittle metal that won't take too well to heat and will break welds quicker than stainless or even mild steel.
Any truth to this? Any full Ti exhaust owners out there been using the same system for a long time?
EDIT: i left my statement above the same, but just double checked my sources. i don't know why i blanked on this, but titanium does indeed form "brittle compounds" when being welded to disimilar metals. so as long as that thing's fully ti, all the pros of ti should be there (including great flexibility). http://www.azom.com/Details.asp?ArticleID=1245 my source
on another note does anyone else not really like the blue tip? i mean i know its a great way to tell everyone that at least the tip is titanium, but i think bare ti is much cleaner and sexier.
Last edited by purecoda; Mar 28, 2005 at 08:07 PM. Reason: fact check
Originally Posted by Evo Police
Figures, it's an American company, making a exhaust for a Japanese car.
I wish they had an award for dumbest post of the day... you could be a winnAr!Sorry to get OT, but ingnorance like this just drives me nuts
I remember one time I went to E-Town in November of 04. When i got there, i forgot to remove the slincer in my Apexi GT exhaust. I made the run down the track and ran a 13.7 i believe. When i finished, I immediately pulled the silencer out of the car and made no other changes. I pulled the exact same 1.8 60' and ran a 13.1. That should give you some sort of idea of how Necking Down would effect performance. The timeslips were basically identical, the only significant change was the silencer. I know that is alittle more dramatic but the same effects apply.
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
The neck down sucks, that's for sure. Typical catback exhaust. Weighs 12 pounds and costs how much Al? Ours is 16 pounds, no reducer in it and is only $450. Hell our exhaust has already made 667 whp on your car, isn't that good enough
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
wow i can't believe nobody brought this up...Tuner Performance Magazine Test
Originally Posted by calvin
wow i can't believe nobody brought this up...Tuner Performance Magazine Test
. As you can see the dyo sheet Bushur Racing catback
247hp-stock
263hp-with catback
Hks Hi-Power
247hp-stock
261hp-with Catback
There is NO 5-8whp difference like Al claims usually is the difference betweent exhausts. Its clearly shown on the dyno sheet.And another thing, the hks turbo kit has the hi-power catback, which has the reducer, then why does the kit make so much hp with that catback?
Last edited by EVIL_EVO_VIII; Mar 29, 2005 at 08:31 AM.
I'd like to see more of the testing methodology (i.e. how repeatable are the results) to see how statistically signficant these results are. There were a few stinkers in the pile who were in the 250 hp range.
Thanks for the info. As i was comparing the dyno numbers from Bushur racing catback and the Hks Hi-power, there was not a big difference at all . As you can see the dyo sheet
Bushur Racing catback
247hp-stock
263hp-with catback
Hks Hi-Power
247hp-stock
261hp-with Catback
There is NO 5-8whp difference like Al claims usually is the difference betweent exhausts. Its clearly shown on the dyno sheet.And another thing, the hks turbo kit has the hi-power catback, which has the reducer, then why does the kit make so much hp with that catback?
Bushur Racing catback
247hp-stock
263hp-with catback
Hks Hi-Power
247hp-stock
261hp-with Catback
There is NO 5-8whp difference like Al claims usually is the difference betweent exhausts. Its clearly shown on the dyno sheet.And another thing, the hks turbo kit has the hi-power catback, which has the reducer, then why does the kit make so much hp with that catback?
Originally Posted by EVIL_EVO_VIII
Thanks for the info. As i was comparing the dyno numbers from Bushur racing catback and the Hks Hi-power, there was not a big difference at all
. As you can see the dyo sheet
Bushur Racing catback
247hp-stock
263hp-with catback
Hks Hi-Power
247hp-stock
261hp-with Catback
There is NO 5-8whp difference like Al claims usually is the difference betweent exhausts. Its clearly shown on the dyno sheet.And another thing, the hks turbo kit has the hi-power catback, which has the reducer, then why does the kit make so much hp with that catback?
. As you can see the dyo sheet Bushur Racing catback
247hp-stock
263hp-with catback
Hks Hi-Power
247hp-stock
261hp-with Catback
There is NO 5-8whp difference like Al claims usually is the difference betweent exhausts. Its clearly shown on the dyno sheet.And another thing, the hks turbo kit has the hi-power catback, which has the reducer, then why does the kit make so much hp with that catback?



