You just answered my question in the previous post. Its not the dash 13. The dash 13 has a 60mm wheel, therefore pushing a little more air/per minute.

 

Haven't said ANY $hit . You just think I am and aparantly the whole world too. I just said low torque, my opinion, and you poop on me . Why post this if you do not like to get responses?

 

Yeah-no bumpers. Try driving for three hours straight. Your crotch will hurt,

 

Yes it's the -13 and is supposidly good for 650 crank hp and I am using a .63 backside.

 

Once again where did you say nice kit? Oh you can't answer me? Why? Because you never said it. You have been talking trash since the first moment you came in my thread. Does it make you feel good about yourself to keep F*&^%^G with me? I hope it makes you feel great about yourself. Honestly if I were you I would have my mouth full of shotgun and my toe on the trigger, so please twitch the toe and get it over with so I don't have to listen to you anymore. Now please leave my thread and don't waste my time anymore.

 

Many times, I am saying it again in fact. It's a nice kit and I wish I had one, although I would go for a LITTLE smaller one as I am mostly on 93-94 Octane. I also stated that your WHP is Great especially on the Mustang dyno, I also said that your Power curve is long and smooth.

Others had stated that they did not like your peak Torque and the lag, I agree, but this is easilly fixed throughout tuning. I even suggested trying a different tuner with a different dyno, kind alike a 2nd opinion is all. That is all I said

Paranoid Delusions of Grandeur. I love that kit and the is the series of Turbo I want. I AM TRYING to pay you a compliment.



I really don't understand why you are so upset? I am no trying to mess with you, seriously.

 

strongbear do you know if the hp@50mph is higher does it decrease the hp&trq numbers? Because if you look at my dyno sheet that i have linked in my sig they had it set at 14.5 which seems high compared to what everyone is saying.

 

I have no clue. I was told you will get higher numbers if the hp @ 50mph is lower but I don't reall know and I could care less about a couple hp. I won't be able to find out either becuase I will have sean ivey tune my car in may and then re-dyno so I will not be changing the hp @ 50 next time.

 

dyno numbers are just that, numbers. So people please quit *****in about the numbers.

 

Thank you. Some time I think people forget that dyno's are used as tuning devices to set cars up. I don't really care if I have 900whp if my car won't make it 200 feet down the road.

 

Yeah some people have hated on my numbers before too, but you can't really compare my numbers to yours unless you ran on the same dyno i did within a couple pulls of it because the numbers are constantly changing because there are so many factors that can effect them. I TOTALLY agree that dyno's are just tuning tools. I don't really care. I was just wondering how that setting affects the finishing numbers. There are just too many ways the numbers can be manipulated by a shop for marketing purposes. I love your setup...I know i want that turbo setup one day.

 

No you can't compare your numbers and mine becuase we are on different turbos and different dynos. I am really not sure about the HP @ 50 though. I doubt it would make a huge difference if you changed it to the 11.5 or 11.9 it is supposed to be set at. I will have to talk to the guys at aerocomp about it..

 

The most accurate way to dermine you power is to run it in the 1/4 mile and look at the trap speed. I bet you can trap above 120MPH

 

This is correct, people always complaining about Dyno #'s and they all read different depending on the operators settings. Bottom line is as long as you are happy Strongbear0, that's all that matters.

 

We shall see. I will be going as soon as I get my tranny and tc serviced by tre or
shep.