Atp turbo kit ?
Originally Posted by Ted B
Actually, I was referring to hitting the turbine blades (not compressor blades) after passing through the engine, neither of which is especially desirable.
turbine blades are pretty tough a bit of rust wont matter at all.
.82 housing=LAG. 340whp on DD dyno.
Originally Posted by statix
So what do you guys feel a 3071 with the.82 housing can make on 100 octane with all the supporting mods on high boost..
Originally Posted by statix
How much laggier can it be over the .63 wouldnt it be worth it since the 3071 seems to not hold boost very well??
who told you that 3071 dont hold boost very well? was is bla bla or you see facts like i do?
Originally Posted by Ted B
If your ATP kit has chromed mild steel IC pipes like mine did, be advised that the inside of these pipes are bare, and will rust (as apparent on the ones I'm holding). I don't want rust debris hitting the turbine blades.
If your kit has these pipes, I strongly suggest having them coated on the *inside* before installation.
Just FYI.
If your kit has these pipes, I strongly suggest having them coated on the *inside* before installation.
Just FYI.
Cast iron rusts as well, IC pipes usually have a thin coating of oil after use.
Perhaps, but the ones I have in my hand are used, there is no thin coating of oil, and there is rust. Again, this may be fine for some, but I don't do things that way.
Furthermore, my IC pipes do not have a thin coating of oil in them, and fortunately, neither does my IC, which would begin reducing its efficiency. If you have oil in your IC pipes (?), I suggest a good cleaning followed by installation of an oil trap system for the PCV.
Furthermore, my IC pipes do not have a thin coating of oil in them, and fortunately, neither does my IC, which would begin reducing its efficiency. If you have oil in your IC pipes (?), I suggest a good cleaning followed by installation of an oil trap system for the PCV.
Originally Posted by Ted B
Perhaps, but the ones I have in my hand are used, there is no thin coating of oil, and there is rust. Again, this may be fine for some, but I don't do things that way.
Furthermore, my IC pipes do not have a thin coating of oil in them, and fortunately, neither does my IC, which would begin reducing its efficiency. If you have oil in your IC pipes (?), I suggest a good cleaning followed by installation of an oil trap system for the PCV.
Furthermore, my IC pipes do not have a thin coating of oil in them, and fortunately, neither does my IC, which would begin reducing its efficiency. If you have oil in your IC pipes (?), I suggest a good cleaning followed by installation of an oil trap system for the PCV.
There are several good catch cans available. The Weapon-R unit should be noted for it's seemingly tidy placement. The others require a little more squeezing for fitment.
Unlike the IC pipes, the EM gets quickly coated with carbon from the exhaust. The O2 housing falls downstream of the turbo, so it is a non-issue.
Unlike the IC pipes, the EM gets quickly coated with carbon from the exhaust. The O2 housing falls downstream of the turbo, so it is a non-issue.
Well, I just ordered the ATP 3071r with the .82 housing which I was told is good for about 25 more hp.
The extra lag shouldnt be a problem since Ill be installing this turbo onto a built 2.4 stroker with a stg 3 head.
And of course I have all the supporting mods, so I will let all of you know how it go's.
I am looking for 450whp on 100octane, I dont think that will be a problem....We'll see...
The extra lag shouldnt be a problem since Ill be installing this turbo onto a built 2.4 stroker with a stg 3 head.
And of course I have all the supporting mods, so I will let all of you know how it go's.
I am looking for 450whp on 100octane, I dont think that will be a problem....We'll see...
