Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

775whp, no nitrous

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 11:00 PM
  #76  
evojon's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Greencastle, PA
Stripped, trailered in beater Camaro with built 412cid and a 400 shot just does'nt seem that fast anymore does it. Technology catches up. PSI is the replacement for displacement!!!
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 11:14 PM
  #77  
Jasil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: NO
IMO, the reason is reliability. The wrist pin sits very high in a stroker as well as the ringland. Most of the very high HP motors, sans Magnus use a 2.0. Bushcur did, Turbotrix, AMS, etc etc.

The lag is made up for with Max rpm strokers max RPM are usually 8K while the 2.0 can rev to 9K and a few go to 9.5K.

Shep went a whole season on his built 2.0 why mess with success?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #78  
housedj's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: in front of your car
Thumbs up

bloody well done chaps!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! will AMS be the 1st US tuner to challenge Norris Design's evo????
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 12:04 AM
  #79  
slowTsi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
I want to see pics of that engine bay! I have thought about it when the LR 2.4 is done, but the snail alone is like 2500. That is some surprising good spool for this monster. Did you guys retard timing and lean it out out of boost?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 12:09 AM
  #80  
JoeA's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 179
Likes: 1
From: Citrus Heights, CA
wow thats crazy
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 12:21 AM
  #81  
Jakeg97's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
sick
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 12:23 AM
  #82  
Jakeg97's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by Iceman2011
i smell 8's good job guys
8s you crazy?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 12:24 AM
  #83  
Jakeg97's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by jerastan
Good lord guys. I go a year w/o my EVO and you've already made me want another. Thanks!
the subaru just isnt doing it for you?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:14 AM
  #84  
RS2's Avatar
RS2
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Video ?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:40 AM
  #85  
SuperHatch's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
From: NJ
If they plan to competitively drag race this car, the 2.0 will result in a lower weight penalty. A lighter car will go faster, and if you look in the rulebook, the weight penalty for that extra .3L of displacement adds more weight than the .3L allows power. Power is directly related to RPM, since the stroker can't ultimately rev as high as a 2.0, the 2.0 can make the same power at higher RPMs than the stroker would at lower RPMs. Same power with less weight = faster.

- Steve
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 04:41 AM
  #86  
jerastan's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: IL
Originally Posted by burningmoney97
the subaru just isnt doing it for you?
oh the sti is awesome, and the wifes wrx wagon rocks...... but neither are as fun as my evo was w/ the ams setup. these guys are THE evo tuners in the U.S., period!.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 05:50 AM
  #87  
EidolaDream's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: <--- that way
Holy macaroni!!!! Go AMS...

Is that the same 2.0l build you offer on your sight? If so sign me up, tehehehe.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 08:45 AM
  #88  
slowTsi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SuperHatch
If they plan to competitively drag race this car, the 2.0 will result in a lower weight penalty. A lighter car will go faster, and if you look in the rulebook, the weight penalty for that extra .3L of displacement adds more weight than the .3L allows power. Power is directly related to RPM, since the stroker can't ultimately rev as high as a 2.0, the 2.0 can make the same power at higher RPMs than the stroker would at lower RPMs. Same power with less weight = faster.

- Steve
Not to mention people haven't really had access to good stroker cams to help cylinder filling with the increased piston speed.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 09:15 AM
  #89  
AutoMotoSports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,132
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
In the case of a 42R you really want to be able to take this thing High in the RPM's to really take advantage of the turbo. Martin Decided to go with the 2.0 so he could "rev the ****" our of it. LOL it seems to be working. We all are very intelligent here when it comes to the cars we work on but when Martin is in the zone you just sit back shut up and hold on.

The video will be up very shortly here today. Ill post it in here and in our forum

Eric
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 10:00 AM
  #90  
smp3000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,631
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
^^^ Can't wait!!@!!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:13 PM.