Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

cam differences...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 06:51 PM
  #31  
inariv5573's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
From: Cherry Hill, N.J.
Originally Posted by SilverMr
I was told by a well known tuner here in Ca. that there is no difference in spool between 264-264 and 272-272.He said that the 264 set-up is a waste of $$$.I want my car set up for auto-cross and canyon driving so this advice has confused me.

Has anybody tried the Tomei, Jun or Piper cams.This same tuner said that any of there cams would walk away from the HKS 264 or 272 set-ups.I plan on using the stock turbo or Busher 's new 20G.

Thanks
Who is this tuner who said 264's are a waste of money? A large majority of Evo's run them with great results. They are perfect for the stock turbo. Not to mention a large number use the HKS's.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 06:58 PM
  #32  
inariv5573's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
From: Cherry Hill, N.J.
Originally Posted by 4-BNGR
264's and 272's have the same lift as the stockers so lifters/retainers are a waste of cabbage. The only diff. among the cams is their duration (where in the rpm curve they make their power)...
No actually the stockers have a smaller lift. The stockers have 10.0 intake and 9.8 exhaust as stated in another post.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 07:12 PM
  #33  
dave9172's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: bel air, md
i agree w/ inariv5573, the 264/264 cannot be a waste of money when its putting up similar numbers to the 272/272, and actually more torque, not to mention a smoother idle. most people say 272/272 is the way to go if you upgrade the turbo, just my 2 cents.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #34  
althemean's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
From what I can gather on here because there is so much conflicting info on the cam specs.

Stock

260 in 10.0mm lift
256ex 10.00mm lift

anyone else care to comment
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 01:19 AM
  #35  
HxllxMan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Tahiti, French Polynesia
I have the 264/264 and I think it's the best for the stock turbo.

But if you are looking for an Turbo upgrade, 272/272 or 280/280 are better.

I think some people are even running 264/264 with a 3071R, and they have great result.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
5k6
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
8
Feb 15, 2019 10:24 PM
kburgess04
Evo General
3
Mar 29, 2011 05:56 PM
camoner
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Jul 26, 2007 04:11 PM
LeeShutup
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
2
Mar 29, 2006 10:41 PM
Rcebowl
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
81
Nov 11, 2005 09:51 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 AM.