Case Study # 118 - Stock Evo IX on Mustang Dyno with 91 - IX rules !

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 5, 2005 | 10:15 PM

#16

fromWRXtoEVO

Evolved Member

iTrader: (18)

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 6,087

Likes: 5

From: Tucson

Quote:

Originally Posted by LuxuryBroker

AL, have you seen any difference in the 9's between the RS, Regular 9, or the MR? If so what has it been?

It should be absolutely no mechanical differences, however some units might give higher numbers than others.

Dec 5, 2005 | 10:20 PM

#17

DynoFlash

Thread Starter

Account Disabled

iTrader: (91)

Joined: Sep 2003

Posts: 16,850

Likes: 0

From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver

Quote:

Originally Posted by fromWRXtoEVO

Al,

who was the top dog on your Dyno weekend at Vividracing? Do you have everyone dyno numbers?

Carlos

You were of course !

Dec 5, 2005 | 10:23 PM

#18

LuxuryBroker

Evolving Member

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 338

Likes: 0

From: Sunny Southern Cali !!!

i was referring to the ecu itself ..

Dec 5, 2005 | 10:30 PM

#19

Warrtalon

Evolved Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 20,790

Likes: 2

From: Long Island, NY

Quote:

Originally Posted by LuxuryBroker

i was referring to the ecu itself ..

You're asking if the ECU is different between the models?? I've never thought to question that. Have they ever been different?

Dec 5, 2005 | 10:37 PM

#20

LuxuryBroker

Evolving Member

iTrader: (22)

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 338

Likes: 0

From: Sunny Southern Cali !!!

some people have "said" the MR ecu had more aggressive timing .... that is why I thought I would as AL as he has seen more than his fair share to comment ...

Dec 5, 2005 | 10:40 PM

#21

Warrtalon

Evolved Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 20,790

Likes: 2

From: Long Island, NY

Quote:

Originally Posted by LuxuryBroker

some people have "said" the MR ecu had more aggressive timing .... that is why I thought I would as AL as he has seen more than his fair share to comment ...

Can you show us where that was said and by whom? The only thing I've ever seen claimed is that people thought the 05s were tuned more aggressively than the 03/04s when trying to explain the power differences in stock form(10.5+20.3psi+Wastegate+Tune).

Dec 5, 2005 | 10:46 PM

#22

DynoFlash

Thread Starter

Account Disabled

iTrader: (91)

Joined: Sep 2003

Posts: 16,850

Likes: 0

From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver

Quote:

Originally Posted by LuxuryBroker

some people have "said" the MR ecu had more aggressive timing .... that is why I thought I would as AL as he has seen more than his fair share to comment ...

They all run the same ecu as in 2005 all evos had same ecu