Clutch restrictor
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (59)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Rockwall, TX
Clutch restrictor
So,is it bad to remove the clutch restrictor? I do not care about breaking driveline parts because I have alredy broke most of them and upgraded to something better(i.e. I have a Quaife LSD). I was just wondering if this was a good idea or bad?
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (59)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Rockwall, TX
i took mines off but ppl on evom said not 2 i dont really know why
it really feels the same but when it comes to launching my clutch just dont smell that bad or at all.... but i really dont launch it anyway its so bad on the tranny
late
it really feels the same but when it comes to launching my clutch just dont smell that bad or at all.... but i really dont launch it anyway its so bad on the tranny
late
If you have the ability to drive responsibly, take it out. If you drive like an idiot, don't take it out and keep a piggy bank to save for those clutches you are going to need.
Trending Topics
perfectly said..
Originally Posted by ACTman
If you have the ability to drive responsibly, take it out. If you drive like an idiot, don't take it out and keep a piggy bank to save for those clutches you are going to need.
Originally Posted by ACTman
If you have the ability to drive responsibly, take it out. If you drive like an idiot, don't take it out and keep a piggy bank to save for those clutches you are going to need.
Why would it wear clutches faster? I can buy the fact that it presents a risk to the transfercase and tranny but why would it wear a clutch out faster? I f anything I would think the opposite because of less slippage?
Originally Posted by EvoTech
Why would it wear clutches faster? I can buy the fact that it presents a risk to the transfercase and tranny but why would it wear a clutch out faster? I f anything I would think the opposite because of less slippage?
Restrictor = safer for idiots to prevent other failures = slower engagement = more slippage = more clutch wear.
Originally Posted by ACTman
You are obviously reading it backward from what I meant.
Restrictor = safer for idiots to prevent other failures = slower engagement = more slippage = more clutch wear.
Restrictor = safer for idiots to prevent other failures = slower engagement = more slippage = more clutch wear.
Duh! My bad. I just re-read your post and yes I read what you were saying backward.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ELamb05MR
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
5
Dec 4, 2014 02:41 PM
Juan Martinez
Lancer Tranny/Drivetrain Tech
13
Aug 19, 2008 02:25 PM
smokedmustang
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
30
Sep 20, 2006 06:52 PM



