New Dyno #
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines FL
New Dyno #
First off my old numbers were whp 298.18 tq 270.83 with
Tanabee Turbo Back Exhaust
Injen Intake with hard upper intercooler pipe
Greddy RS BOV
SAFC II (Tuned)
Turbosmart manual Boost controller, 21.5psi
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOW After a few passes I made some good numbers I just wish the car wasnt so hot i would have hit the 300 marker whp 290.73 tq 311.06 with
Tanabee Turbo Back Exhaust
Injen Intake with hard upper intercooler pipe
Forge RS BOV
AMS FMIC and AMS LICP
Dyno Flash Custom Tune
Forge manual Boost controller, 21psi
Walbro 255 Fuel Pump
Big props go out to
DynoFlash thanks Big AL
FYNETUNE Performance= Best Evo guys in MIAMI FL
Tanabee Turbo Back Exhaust
Injen Intake with hard upper intercooler pipe
Greddy RS BOV
SAFC II (Tuned)
Turbosmart manual Boost controller, 21.5psi
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOW After a few passes I made some good numbers I just wish the car wasnt so hot i would have hit the 300 marker whp 290.73 tq 311.06 with
Tanabee Turbo Back Exhaust
Injen Intake with hard upper intercooler pipe
Forge RS BOV
AMS FMIC and AMS LICP
Dyno Flash Custom Tune
Forge manual Boost controller, 21psi
Walbro 255 Fuel Pump
Big props go out to
DynoFlash thanks Big AL
FYNETUNE Performance= Best Evo guys in MIAMI FL
Evolving Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville TN
Originally Posted by CubanEVO
Yeah the car was hot as *****
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines FL
Originally Posted by Tpayne84
You gained an a$$ load of TQ though. i dont get how you can loose 8 WHP and gain 41 TQ.... thats the first time i have ever seen that.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines FL
Originally Posted by fsugatorbait
Yes, with those mods you should be around 300-315whp conservatively on a Dynojet.
Oh ok i know that i should have more whp all the guys told me that i need to change my plugs and to put the car on the dyno when its cooler.
Originally Posted by CubanEVO
Oh ok i know that i should have more whp all the guys told me that i need to change my plugs and to put the car on the dyno when its cooler.
What plugs are you running and what are they gapped at? Stock plugs should be fine for those mods. Id go with BR7ES if they need to be changed though.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines FL
Originally Posted by fsugatorbait
What plugs are you running and what are they gapped at? Stock plugs should be fine for those mods. Id go with BR7ES if they need to be changed though.
I used the BR7ES gapped to 25 and i lost power with them so what i did was i grabed the stock plugs cleaned them and gapped them to 25
Use BPR7ES gapped to .026 (.025 is fine, too).
Btw, these were also different dynojets with different corrections.
If you could zip and upload the actual electronic runfiles, that would help. You definitely gained a lot of area under the curve, but your peak whp isn't as high. Also, your SAFC tune was dangerously lean for daily driving if the AFRs on the dyno are accurate.
Btw, these were also different dynojets with different corrections.
If you could zip and upload the actual electronic runfiles, that would help. You definitely gained a lot of area under the curve, but your peak whp isn't as high. Also, your SAFC tune was dangerously lean for daily driving if the AFRs on the dyno are accurate.
Last edited by Warrtalon; Apr 8, 2006 at 03:56 PM.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Use BPR7ES gapped to .026 (.025 is fine, too).
Btw, these were also different dynojets with different corrections.
If you could zip and upload the actual electronic runfiles, that would help. You definitely gained a lot of area under the curve, but your peak whp isn't as high. Also, your SAFC tune was dangerously lean for daily driving if the AFRs on the dyno are accurate.
Btw, these were also different dynojets with different corrections.
If you could zip and upload the actual electronic runfiles, that would help. You definitely gained a lot of area under the curve, but your peak whp isn't as high. Also, your SAFC tune was dangerously lean for daily driving if the AFRs on the dyno are accurate.
My car does not like the protruding tip and ive read that TTP ENG has stated they are not to be used with turbo cars. Ive had my best luck with BR8ES.