20g comparison
Hmmm? I don't understand this modified thing with the Forge WGA. I installed the Forge WGA at the same time as the 20G-9-6 and I had no fitment problems. It might look a little tight, but the WGA does not touch any other part of the car. The thing definitely helps spool up.
I don't have a way of posting the graph yet. Peak torque(boost) from 16g came in at 4k 3rd gear pull. Peak torque(boost) on 20g came in at 4750 same 3rd gear pull. I did tighten the wastegate that came with it. The first pull without touching the wastegate only boosted 19 psi. Tighten the wastegate and it boosted to 21 but dropped off to 17-18.
Last edited by awddyno; Jul 3, 2006 at 09:41 AM.
Got my reading done from a searching. Should've stayed with the stock turbo for my driving style. Race gas would've gotten me into 11's. This is 20g??? suppose to be is not what I was looking for.
Originally Posted by awddyno
Got my reading done from a searching. Should've stayed with the stock turbo for my driving style. Race gas would've gotten me into 11's. This is 20g??? suppose to be is not what I was looking for.
EVOlutionary
Originally Posted by kimletrim
Once again, I'm not going get into the 6 blade and 5 blade comparison, its already been beat to death.
Originally Posted by kimletrim
What I will say is that I have the same turbo as the one you just installed and I came from an 05 MR turbo. I certainly felt the difference and I gained power across the board, even with 91 octane.
I invite anyone who reads this to furnish dyno charts that show us something a 6-blade 20G accomplished that a 16G cannot do. We've seen Buschur's 20G-9-5 do what would be impossible for a 16G, but not the cheaper 6-blade 20G. All I've personally seen from the 6-blade 20G is 16G-level performance but with less torque and slower spool at the same settings.
It's been several months since I first presented this invitation to furnish proof and we're still waiting . . .
Last edited by Ted B; Jul 3, 2006 at 11:45 AM.
Wow. My dyno sheets show just what you said. Less torque, later spool, not enough top end to even compare. I bought this turbo hoping for a step up performance but instead lost my awesome low end torque.
Originally Posted by EVOlutionary
You did not need a 20G to run 11's. It could have been done on the stock '03 or '04 turbo. It's all about combination of parts that compliment eachother.
EVOlutionary
EVOlutionary
Can you post up the sheet? Sounds like you've got something else going on...
The spool should be pretty much identical but with slightly better tq. Power was about the same on my 6blade. I have an appt on the 14th to dyno my 5 blade so we'll see how it compares
The spool should be pretty much identical but with slightly better tq. Power was about the same on my 6blade. I have an appt on the 14th to dyno my 5 blade so we'll see how it compares
Originally Posted by awddyno
Wow. My dyno sheets show just what you said. Less torque, later spool, not enough top end to even compare. I bought this turbo hoping for a step up performance but instead lost my awesome low end torque.
The more data we have available, the more accurate of a picture we can paint for the benefit of forum members who contemplate this route.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
You got the 20g-9-6, which isn't as good. It's already been shown that it has to be cranking big boost on race gas or alky to show gains, and even those gains aren't much. It's not meant for just slapping onto a lightly-modded Evo using pump gas daily.
If you just got a stock IX, you would have gained around 20whp/20wtq without a loss of torque and only a minimal difference in spool.
If you just got a stock IX, you would have gained around 20whp/20wtq without a loss of torque and only a minimal difference in spool.
Either way, until somebody do a real comparison between the stock turbo vs evo 9 vs 20g 9 blade vs 20g 9 6 blade. All of this over hype on this turbo tell me it's a junk.
Huh, vboy? My point was that this turbo sucks. Read what I wrote again and let it sink in. why are you jumping on me about race gas and alky when I'm saying that's exactly why it's not very good, especially if the guy is just running pump gas daily. Btw, no one needs to be richie rich to run alky. It costs me an extra $4 per week to have another 20-30whp and 40-50wtq.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Huh, vboy? My point was that this turbo sucks. Read what I wrote again and let it sink in. why are you jumping on me about race gas and alky when I'm saying that's exactly why it's not very good, especially if the guy is just running pump gas daily. Btw, no one needs to be richie rich to run alky. It costs me an extra $4 per week to have another 20-30whp and 40-50wtq.
Better yet just get one of this and call it a day.
Last edited by vboy425; Jul 3, 2006 at 02:33 PM.






