Ported stock intake manifold vs Magnus SMIM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Ported stock intake manifold vs Magnus SMIM.
As many of you know I had a failure of my Magnus SMIM, and put on a ported stock intake manifold as a replacement. I had to wait until now to do some real data logs because I wanted to put new injector isolators on befor going into heavy boost. I finished that up today, and the results are interesting!
Running a speed density system with the AEM EMS, so any significant changes in air flow will show changes in your A/F reading on a data log. Here is the jist of the testing.
Virtually identical spool up and A/F ratio until above 7000 RPM. At around 7300 RPM the ported stock intake manifold log shows a significantly richer A/F ratio all the way up to 8000 RPM where they showed an A/F ratio of 10.75:1 for the ported stock manifold vs the same tune with the Magnus SMIM where the A/F ratio was 11.3:1
My conclusion is that the Magnus has no downfall in the lower RPMs compared to a ported stock intake manifold, and shows significant gains in air flow above 7,000 RPM. Keep in mind this was one of the first SMIM's Magnus made for the EVO, and did NOT have the velocity stacks in it.
My impression from driving the car (seat of the pants "feel" of the car) is that the off boost throttle response of the Magnus SMIM was much better than the off boost throttle response with the ported stock intake manifold.
Later,
Keith
Running a speed density system with the AEM EMS, so any significant changes in air flow will show changes in your A/F reading on a data log. Here is the jist of the testing.
Virtually identical spool up and A/F ratio until above 7000 RPM. At around 7300 RPM the ported stock intake manifold log shows a significantly richer A/F ratio all the way up to 8000 RPM where they showed an A/F ratio of 10.75:1 for the ported stock manifold vs the same tune with the Magnus SMIM where the A/F ratio was 11.3:1
My conclusion is that the Magnus has no downfall in the lower RPMs compared to a ported stock intake manifold, and shows significant gains in air flow above 7,000 RPM. Keep in mind this was one of the first SMIM's Magnus made for the EVO, and did NOT have the velocity stacks in it.
My impression from driving the car (seat of the pants "feel" of the car) is that the off boost throttle response of the Magnus SMIM was much better than the off boost throttle response with the ported stock intake manifold.
Later,
Keith
Last edited by Fourdoor; Sep 14, 2006 at 05:23 PM.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TTP Engineering
Evo 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
45
Dec 1, 2009 12:32 PM
TTP Engineering
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
22
Aug 3, 2009 09:36 AM
Keith-PURE Tuning
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
27
Nov 7, 2008 04:54 PM
Tevenor
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
16
Apr 22, 2008 04:56 PM






