Dynoed Evo IX with just Flash!
Evolved Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, California
Originally Posted by onefast4dr
wow, I thought that most IX's were dynoing somewhere around 230-240 stock. I think it really depends on the dyno tho.
, joking.
Originally Posted by TKMotorsports
Guys these numbers are on par for a Evo IX with good tune.
For the last time, dyno was on a dynojet! It's what 90% of people use on here.
For the last time, dyno was on a dynojet! It's what 90% of people use on here.
Agreed,Post the dyno and what were the Af's @?
Nice number BTW with the ECu flash!!!
Last edited by IEXCELR8; Sep 19, 2006 at 05:50 PM.
Originally Posted by midknightrocket
I think my car is up there with u i mean i trap 109 with just a mbc and flash set at 22 and i have 93 octane so im guessing im at close to 300 dynojet
Here's what I'm making on my EVO 9 with...
-Hallman MBC
-HKS drop in filter
-Speed Element Alpha Flash
Everything else is stock
Baseline 217 wtq 233.6 whp
Tuned 299 wtq 272 whp
Gains
+82 wtq
+38 whp
91 octane
Last edited by EFIxMR; Sep 19, 2006 at 07:38 PM.
Here are my two base line runs - prior to the Ecutek. One was at stock boost - the other at 21psi (holding to redline)
Here is are my numbers after the flash - holding 21psi. Pretty nice gain!!
Here is are my numbers after the flash - holding 21psi. Pretty nice gain!!
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: So cali.
Wow those are some nice numbers! I wish we have 93 octane here in California! My evo 9 made 328whp/310lbs at 23psi on 91 octane. This was with TBE, injectors, fuel pump, intake. Tune on EcuFlash.
Well, it is a before and after of the same car, bone stock vs bone stock with tune, mbc, and drop in filter.
This dyno reads within 5 whp of the mustang/dd in my area, namely Northern California.
On a stock turbo be that EVO IX or 8 the strongest cars only get about 300 whp 300 wtq.
I have logged about 100 hours on the Mustang dyno now, and have played with various settings.... namely HP@50 and SAE corrections on vs off...
And honestly found little difference.
I use the machine set as is from the dyno's owner, so we are all on the same page. So, I can compare with the results of other cars on that same machine.
It really makes little concern to me how others are setting up their dynos across the country...
What matters is the change in power and tq curves before and after. My results are undeniable.
This dyno reads within 5 whp of the mustang/dd in my area, namely Northern California.
On a stock turbo be that EVO IX or 8 the strongest cars only get about 300 whp 300 wtq.
I have logged about 100 hours on the Mustang dyno now, and have played with various settings.... namely HP@50 and SAE corrections on vs off...
And honestly found little difference.
I use the machine set as is from the dyno's owner, so we are all on the same page. So, I can compare with the results of other cars on that same machine.
It really makes little concern to me how others are setting up their dynos across the country...
What matters is the change in power and tq curves before and after. My results are undeniable.
I have a Mustang MD500 AWD dyno. Just stating that the software that is displayed with your runs is a much older version. Best I have seen of a IX on my dyno, all stock is 237. Average is more in the range of 227-230. Flash, filter, full 3 inch. 300-310 depending on which 91 gas the car has.
I use higher vehicle weights and HP @ 50 as the current Mustang softwares lookup tables have as standards.
I've spent more than 100 hours on this dyno.
I use higher vehicle weights and HP @ 50 as the current Mustang softwares lookup tables have as standards.
I've spent more than 100 hours on this dyno.