Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

6 Speed Tranny a weak link?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 08:41 PM
  #286  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by 555R
did anyone do a side by side comparison and actually measure out the gears?
Yes, John @ TRE did. Hence, where the mm measurements of the gears come from.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 10:03 PM
  #287  
Wheelhaus's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 377
Likes: 3
From: Denver
Originally Posted by 555R
did anyone do a side by side comparison and actually measure out the gears?
for the '05 IX 4th and the '06 IX 4th? I can't remember, it was earlier in this thread. IIRC the part numbers were different, but the paired gear was identical, meaning same width (14mm).

edit:
I just searched, it was posted in the Track ****** thread, one of the last 3 pages (sorry I forgot to copy/paste the thread link).
the input shaft gear's part number is identical, so for the output shaft gear, though they have different part numbers, must match the same physical size and shape.

Last edited by Wheelhaus; Mar 22, 2007 at 10:12 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 10:12 PM
  #288  
EVO Neil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by Wheelhaus
for the '05 IX 4th and the '06 IX 4th? I can't remember, it was earlier in this thread. IIRC the part numbers were different, but the paired gear was identical, meaning same width (14mm).
Different part numbers = different parts. Maybe different material or strength. Something has to have changed otherwise they'd have the same part number.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #289  
Wheelhaus's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 377
Likes: 3
From: Denver
That is entirely possible, but which of the two 4th gears is failing more frequently, input or output? If it's the output gear that keeps failing, then maybe the new output gear is more heat resillient somehow.

I'm no metallurgist, but I wonder how much more heat/stress resistant you can make transmission gears, moreso than they already are.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 11:03 PM
  #290  
Exciting News's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 844
Likes: 1
From: local area man
Originally Posted by EVO Neil
Different part numbers = different parts. Maybe different material or strength. Something has to have changed otherwise they'd have the same part number.
Absolutely positively untrue. Different part number does NOT automatically = different part. What is your proof?

It's not uncommon to have a part number updated or altered on the exact same part for a different model year or model revision.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 05:39 AM
  #291  
silverEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Utopia
Originally Posted by Exciting News
Absolutely positively untrue. Different part number does NOT automatically = different part. What is your proof?

It's not uncommon to have a part number updated or altered on the exact same part for a different model year or model revision.
Well, I don't know for sure that or other car manufacturers will use different numbers for the same part which they produce or use internally. But as an engineer and machine designer for more years than I'd like to admit, I can tell you for a fact that having different numbers for the same part is a very bad idea and can cause a lot of expense and confusion. It's not as bad as having different parts with the same number, but bad anyway.

Having said all that, I'll admit that parts can be standard such as some bearings, gears and pulleys. For instance a ball bearing # 6012 is a 90mm o.d. x 60 mm i.d. and 18mm wide. However, different manufacturers will have their own part number for it. The same is true for spur gears, timing belt pulleys and a myriad of stock mechanical components. Some transmission gears, bearings and spacers might well follow under this condition.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 08:18 AM
  #292  
Wheelhaus's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 377
Likes: 3
From: Denver
Originally Posted by Exciting News
Absolutely positively untrue. Different part number does NOT automatically = different part. What is your proof?

It's not uncommon to have a part number updated or altered on the exact same part for a different model year or model revision.
Oh I understand this, I work at a manufacturer and we make our own parts. I'm just going by common sense until proven otherwise.

I believe the input gear is the same.
My proof is that I have absolutely no reason to believe they HAVE changed it, considering it's still apparently the same part number.

I believe the output gear has changed.
Why? If the part is identical in supplier, material, design, manufacture process, treatment process, and assembly process, I will believe your statement. However, until proven otherwise, I will continue to believe something about one of the above elements has been altered in some way, and would justify a different part number. Better or worse, I can't say.

I have seen all of these situations happen, unfortunately from the same manufacturer...
identical parts with different part numbers
different parts with identical part numbers
upgraded parts with identical part numbers

ideally...
different parts with different part numbers from the same manufacturer
even if the parts are upgraded and 100% interchangeable, it doesn't matter. This could be from an fitment and design change, different supplier, manufacturing process change, whatever. All it means is that the parts are not identical in every way. This is for an ideal world as silverEVO8 said.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 09:07 AM
  #293  
555R's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 1
From: Dirrrty Jerzey
what
you mean noone out there has a rockwell hardness tester?
where are all our armchair engineers...
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 10:59 AM
  #294  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by Wheelhaus
for the '05 IX 4th and the '06 IX 4th? I can't remember, it was earlier in this thread. IIRC the part numbers were different, but the paired gear was identical, meaning same width (14mm).

edit:
I just searched, it was posted in the Track ****** thread, one of the last 3 pages (sorry I forgot to copy/paste the thread link).
the input shaft gear's part number is identical, so for the output shaft gear, though they have different part numbers, must match the same physical size and shape.
Correct on for 4th gear on the input shaft. However, there is no part number for 4th gear on the output shaft. I checked in the USA and in Japan. The output shaft comes as an assembled unit with all the gears, etc on it. The part number for the '05 MR and '06 MR output shaft is the same, so there is no difference in 4th gear on the output shaft either.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:03 AM
  #295  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by 555R
what
you mean noone out there has a rockwell hardness tester?
where are all our armchair engineers...
I have several hardness testers and metallography equipment. I was trying to get a fund together to buy a new output shaft 4th gear to compare with razorlab's broken output shaft 4th gear, but the project kinda came to a halt when I found out that its impossible to get 4th gear on the output shaft by itself. I could compare razorlab's broken output shaft 4th gear to a new input shaft 4th gear, but it wouldn't be a one-to-one comparison. There's a possibility that the input shaft 4th gear and output shaft 4th gear were not manufactured in the same way.

Last edited by mrfred; Mar 23, 2007 at 11:18 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:09 AM
  #296  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Why doesn't someone call up Aisin and ask?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:43 AM
  #297  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
im building a trans cooler to see if this aids in longevity, i may install a probe to measure temp before and after install, but thats alot of work hee he jk

cb
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #298  
Mike01gsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: PA
^^you making kits to sell or just for yourself?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:54 AM
  #299  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Originally Posted by Mike01gsr
^^you making kits to sell or just for yourself?
i can answer that better when i get vendor status!! which will be any day now!

cb
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:55 AM
  #300  
EVO Neil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
^^^ Seriously, you have a solution to this issue.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:17 AM.