Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Buschur's Turbo Choices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #106  
Tha Shocker!'s Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 1
From: TN
Originally Posted by EvoAnthony
I see a 3065 kit in my near future....thanks Jrod!
Me too It's sounds perfect for my boosting needs!
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 06:21 AM
  #107  
Jrod@Buschur's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (101)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 1
From: York, PA
Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
I didn't point out the fact that you guys use a 44mm compared to their 38mm because that wouldn't be a reason why their kit costs more.

All I did was highlight the obvious.

I didn't know you guys included the turbo outlet pipe to adapt to the LICP (other brands, anyways). That'll save me money (if I go the 35R route, which I prefer your kit).
I knew why you did not include the W/G but I wanted to put it out there so it was noticed that we use a better wastegate with our kit.

Let me know if you have any other questions on the kit. I'll be glad to help you out.... or anyone for that matter.


Originally Posted by Tha Shocker!
Is your tubular mani an option on the FP3065 kit also, and how much better would spool up be??
Yes it is. It would be $3895 as well and it will include our 3" downpipe also.

Spool up.... I can not comment on that right now but I will be able to shortly. Shearer just finished mine. Im sending it out to be coated and then it will be installed. I will make a post once its installed and tuned.


Originally Posted by EvoAnthony
I see a 3065 kit in my near future....thanks Jrod!
Anytime!
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 09:31 AM
  #108  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,046
Likes: 76
From: Riverview, FL
Originally Posted by Jrod@Buschur
I knew why you did not include the W/G but I wanted to put it out there so it was noticed that we use a better wastegate with our kit.

Let me know if you have any other questions on the kit. I'll be glad to help you out.... or anyone for that matter.
Gotcha

I'll be sure to PM you with the questions I have.
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 11:12 AM
  #109  
boostinpsi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Reno
i stole jrods quote for my sig.

im interested in the 3065 in the future if i end up going to a stroker motor since i do track and autoX im kinda leaning towards the 50 trim..

what do you think the spoolup would be with a 2.4l stroker on the 3065?
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 01:58 PM
  #110  
mosorio29's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 1
From: brownsville TX.
what is the difference in spool and hp between a br mani and a tubular on a 35r?
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 10:31 PM
  #111  
High_PSI's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 17
I am willing to bet you would get BETTER spoolup with the BR Manifold vs. the Tubular. Top end would be better with the Tubular.
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 11:25 PM
  #112  
Jasil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: NO
Originally Posted by High_PSI
I am willing to bet you would get BETTER spoolup with the BR Manifold vs. the Tubular. Top end would be better with the Tubular.
I agree or there will be no change
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 03:49 AM
  #113  
yellowEVO21's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Originally Posted by boostinpsi
i stole jrods quote for my sig.

im interested in the 3065 in the future if i end up going to a stroker motor since i do track and autoX im kinda leaning towards the 50 trim..

what do you think the spoolup would be with a 2.4l stroker on the 3065?
great, lol
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 07:32 AM
  #114  
Jrod@Buschur's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (101)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 1
From: York, PA
Originally Posted by boostinpsi
i stole jrods quote for my sig.

im interested in the 3065 in the future if i end up going to a stroker motor since i do track and autoX im kinda leaning towards the 50 trim..

what do you think the spoolup would be with a 2.4l stroker on the 3065?
Glad you liked it. lol

I wouldnt recommend the 50 trim unless that what you REALLY want. The 20G-9LT flows the same amount of air and makes identical horsepower for substantially less money. 20G-9LT = $1700 Vs 50 trim = $2995. Less lag on the 20G-9LT for less money and similar power.

The 3065 on a stroker works really well. We have done a few of them here and they are fun cars to drive. Spool is like another 300rpm sooner or so. I dont remember exactly. Im pretty sure its around 4000rpm though.

The way I present turbo choices to customers is in this order. 20G-9LT, 3065, 35R, 37R, Etc.... I leave out the 50 trim, 3076, etc... there are just better options for power for less money or the same amount.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 08:36 AM
  #115  
mudduck's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 657
Likes: 1
From: Charlottesville, VA
Jrod, do you guys at BR feel that getting a 20gLT is a worthwhile (significant/noticeable) upgrade from a stock IX turbo?


any noticeable midrange gains besides just the extra 30-35whp on the top-end?


will this turbo be as fun to daily drive (low-end torque) as my stock IX?
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 08:59 AM
  #116  
Jrod@Buschur's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (101)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 1
From: York, PA
Originally Posted by mudduck
Jrod, do you guys at BR feel that getting a 20gLT is a worthwhile (significant/noticeable) upgrade from a stock IX turbo?


any noticeable midrange gains besides just the extra 30-35whp on the top-end?


will this turbo be as fun to daily drive (low-end torque) as my stock IX?
This subject has been discussed time and time again. A search will net you ALOT of information on this turbo as well as feedback and results from other members.

In a nutshell...... Without a doubt it will be a good upgrade over the stock turbo. It offers more than just 30-35whp over stock. Most are seeing 40-50whp with the right combination of parts. The turbo is proven to run high 10's / low 11's numerous times.

With the correct supporting mods its a straight up BLAST to drive! Lag isnt much more than stock. A few hundred RPM.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 01:42 PM
  #117  
Duby's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Annandale, NJ
Originally Posted by Tha Shocker!
Me too It's sounds perfect for my boosting needs!
me three . . .minus the fact it's pending on if I need a new transfer case or not
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 03:13 PM
  #118  
chrismnj's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: NJ
I'm getting 3o r
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 03:14 PM
  #119  
chrismnj's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: NJ
what kind a injectors should i get with 30 r
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #120  
TurboIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jrod@Buschur
This subject has been discussed time and time again. A search will net you ALOT of information on this turbo as well as feedback and results from other members.

In a nutshell...... Without a doubt it will be a good upgrade over the stock turbo. It offers more than just 30-35whp over stock. Most are seeing 40-50whp with the right combination of parts. The turbo is proven to run high 10's / low 11's numerous times.

With the correct supporting mods its a straight up BLAST to drive! Lag isnt much more than stock. A few hundred RPM.
What about with no supporting mods...Just a TBE...Swtiching from stock turbo to this 20g turbo?..

How much gains Do you usally see?..
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:40 AM.