Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

RNR turbo kits?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 05:26 AM
  #31  
DTM's Avatar
DTM
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Dulles, VA 20166
Originally Posted by JordanS4
dtm 50 trim went as fast as 128 and 126 on the best ET run. Look up user "speed"
Thats just on pump gas. He would easily be in the mid 135's with the 50 trim and race fuel.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 09:21 AM
  #32  
HmanEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
From: Pingree Grove, IL
Originally Posted by DTM
Thats just on pump gas. He would easily be in the mid 135's with the 50 trim and race fuel.
His post says pump/alky. See here. His sig also says 11.3@125 which I'm assuming is his best et run. I saw in a later post he trapped 127mph but ran a worse et. 135's on race is stretching don't you think?

He's also running an AEM EMS compared to others like myself and Creamo running the stock ecu. I think what most are trying to say in defense of the RnR kits is that they are more than capable of performing as well as some of the more popular kits out there and do so costing significantly less.

I'll add that I am in no way defending RnR the company as we all know they're long gone and can burn in hell as far as I'm concerned. I just don't think all of the kits were junk as some say and deserve a little more credit.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #33  
DTM's Avatar
DTM
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Dulles, VA 20166
Originally Posted by HmanEVO
His post says pump/alky. See here. His sig also says 11.3@125 which I'm assuming is his best et run. I saw in a later post he trapped 127mph but ran a worse et. 135's on race is stretching don't you think?

He's also running an AEM EMS compared to others like myself and Creamo running the stock ecu. I think what most are trying to say in defense of the RnR kits is that they are more than capable of performing as well as some of the more popular kits out there and do so costing significantly less.

I'll add that I am in no way defending RnR the company as we all know they're long gone and can burn in hell as far as I'm concerned. I just don't think all of the kits were junk as some say and deserve a little more credit.
I am in no way am bashing anyones preference in turbo kits. Just talking about a particular car. I didn't mean to come off the wrong way.
As far as the TURBO itself is concerned, 135 mph traps on race fuel is completely possible, bu pushing it when asking for longevity.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 05:47 PM
  #34  
DTM's Avatar
DTM
Account Disabled
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
From: Dulles, VA 20166
Oh yeah and I stand corrected, I was COMPLETELY wrong. He WAS on alky injection and 24 psi at the time. We never got a chance to turn the boost up to see what it could do with more power.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #35  
chrsevx's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Anywhere I want.
you need a full race twin scroll setup end of story
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Spooldyou
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
23
Jan 13, 2007 07:24 AM
warpspeedEVO
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
23
Dec 4, 2006 07:04 PM
EvO6-RS2
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
44
Sep 15, 2006 06:15 PM
splurge3188
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
2
Feb 9, 2005 05:07 PM
RnR Racing
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
12
Sep 15, 2003 12:22 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:24 PM.