20G-9-5 to 20G-LT

Subscribe
Jan 14, 2007 | 11:52 AM
  #16  
dyno result from a 20g Lt and gsc s1 cams.

http://www.socalevo.net/index.php?op...&topic=36174.0
Reply 0
Jan 14, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #17  
Quote: maybe those stock turbo 8's are making that on meth, but certainly not on pump on BUSCHUR's dyno.

i'd say the average for evo's on pump on the stock turbo is around 330-350 on a dynojet, certainly not the low-reading buschur mustang dyno.
Sorry - to clarify all #'s I was talking about are estimates on 93+meth or C16.
Reply 0
Jan 14, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #18  
Quote: dyno result from a 20g Lt and gsc s1 cams.

http://www.socalevo.net/index.php?op...&topic=36174.0
Looks good - solid 35-45 whp gains everywhere from 4500rpms up. I would be very happy with that. Too bad you didn't do the cams and turbo separately to see exactly what gain each gave. . .

That is what I will be doing in 3 weeks.

EVOlutionary
Reply 0
Jan 14, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #19  
I upgraded from the stock 16g to a 20gLT. I set the car up for road course and after driving it on the street to test it after an Ivey tune, I haven't put the keys away.
I would ask if anyone in Chi-Town is willing to take you for a drive, then make your decision - nothing like an *** dyno!
Reply 0
Jan 14, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #20  
Looking at the graph.. he gained 28hp and 20lb of torque with 20gLT, LICP, 02 Housing and CAMS... thats going from 16G to 20GLT... i could see those number on a regular 20G maybe even higher... i think i'll keep my old 20g as of right now...
Reply 0
Jan 14, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #21  
I think the LTs ability to hold higher boost with much less taper will be most beneficial to those of us who run meth or race gas. Im sure that the pump gas owners would see a pretty decent gain based on what's been demonstrated as well... Im also anxious to see more 1/4 mile before and after results to show us even more proof.
Reply 0
Jan 14, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #22  
Quote: Looking at the graph.. he gained 28hp and 20lb of torque with 20gLT, LICP, 02 Housing and CAMS... thats going from 16G to 20GLT... i could see those number on a regular 20G maybe even higher... i think i'll keep my old 20g as of right now...
Someone needs new glasses. It clearly shows 40whp at many points throughout the powerband. That is if we are talking about the same graph - don't know if we are. . .
Reply 0
Jan 15, 2007 | 07:49 AM
  #23  
Quote: Someone needs new glasses. It clearly shows 40whp at many points throughout the powerband. That is if we are talking about the same graph - don't know if we are. . .

i was just lookin at the peak power gain

Stock turbo 327.74hp 310.52tq
20GLT With Cams 355.28 330.69

i can still see those results on a regular 20G and cams
Reply 0
Jan 15, 2007 | 08:16 AM
  #24  
Peak power means nothing - ESPECIALLY on a non-smoothed graph like the one posted. One good little bump on the baseline graph can really make the peak gain of the new setup look minimal. That is why you must really look at and understand the whole graph, not just look at 2 numbers and base your whole opinion off of that.

If you can see those results on a reg. 20G and cams, then you will see even greater results with the LT. It is a matter of simple physics - it flows more air, period. You can stick your head in the sand all you want; as I've said before, just because YOU can't realize the gains are there, doesn't make it not true. I just don't want your incorrect assertions to negatively impact potential buyers looking for TRUE information on this turbo.

EVOlutionary
Reply 0
Subscribe