Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

EVO 9 20G-LT + GSC S1 cams dyno!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 02:13 PM
  #46  
socalmr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
is there no possibility that it is the tune?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #47  
dxbevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, U.A.E.
Birdie..i feel your pain...dont worry about the numbers...evos are not the best dyno queens....as long as you like how its driving on the road...thats what matters

Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 02:44 PM
  #48  
GregGSC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
From: Charleston SC
7psi increase and only 25whp. thats 91 octain for you... try adding some race gas before you spend the money on going with the meth.

the S1 cams are good to around 450whp before you should think about going to S2 or a larger cam.. your in the right area as far as the cam size.

also we should have a good comparison of S1 cams on the stock turbo on the same dyno in the next few weeks. and AMS is going to do a back to back stock vs s1 cams. i know Eric and Martin went so far as to reinstall the stock cams in the car so we can have an exact number as to what the cams do.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #49  
MR. Birdie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: So cali.
Greg is right, the cams do work and cant expect much from 91 octane. I also feel that I ain't giving this turbo a fair deal, so i'll let you guys know soon how it will respond on meth. Is there any local hardware store that sale 100% meth on the shelf?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #50  
dxbevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, U.A.E.
great news greg...cant wait to see those numbers...
my cams are going in thursday and will have dyno numbers up by sunday max..will keep u posted..
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #51  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I looked at the sheet. 28 whp gains peak and 20 ft lbs peak. 50 ft lbs of torque and about 50 whp gains in the midrange.

Seems pretty darn good to me.

Mr. Birdie,

First let me say I truly appreciate you buying our parts, really I do. So DO NOT take offense to the rest of my post.

This car is not set up how I suggest. It has no FMIC upgrade, no ported exhaust manifold and it is running through a high flow cat. I'd say the power you made on straight 91 octane is borderline GREAT!

Also, do you have an EVO8 or EVO9? If you have an EVO8 I am not sure why you made the cam choice you did. This is not to bash GSC but we have some other cams I'd have recommended, even though I admit I have NOT tested GSC's either.

I just know we can gain atleast 27 whp just from a cam swap on an EVO8 and that's with a mild cam.

Great results I think. 91 octane and cat with minimal mods.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #52  
MR. Birdie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: So cali.
David,
So you would recommend test pipe and FMIC and go back to the dyno again? I have a evo 9. What's the power difference with the test pipe and a HFC? I thought it very miminal when going from HFC to a test pipe.




Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I looked at the sheet. 28 whp gains peak and 20 ft lbs peak. 50 ft lbs of torque and about 50 whp gains in the midrange.

Seems pretty darn good to me.

Mr. Birdie,

First let me say I truly appreciate you buying our parts, really I do. So DO NOT take offense to the rest of my post.

This car is not set up how I suggest. It has no FMIC upgrade, no ported exhaust manifold and it is running through a high flow cat. I'd say the power you made on straight 91 octane is borderline GREAT!

Also, do you have an EVO8 or EVO9? If you have an EVO8 I am not sure why you made the cam choice you did. This is not to bash GSC but we have some other cams I'd have recommended, even though I admit I have NOT tested GSC's either.

I just know we can gain atleast 27 whp just from a cam swap on an EVO8 and that's with a mild cam.

Great results I think. 91 octane and cat with minimal mods.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 07:06 PM
  #53  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Mr Birdie.

The offroad pipe on your car would gain atleast 15 whp, the car is making good power so 15 whp with an offroad pipe would not surprise me. Also the Race FMIC would gain a solid 10-15 too. The major change in your set up, stand alone.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 07:18 PM
  #54  
MR. Birdie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: So cali.
David,

Can you cut me a deal with one of your GT30 kit ? =P
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 07:22 PM
  #55  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Mr Birdie, yes I could but that would be a horrible move from where you are. You need to finish up your mods first. What do you have an EVO 8 or 9? Look through Stages 1-4 and get the rest of those parts. Then consider an AEM EMS. Bring me the car and let me tune it. (Not that the tune you have now looks bad, it looks good actually) When I am done with it and it has the right recommended parts on it, you will NOT want a GT30.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 07:40 PM
  #56  
LuxuryBroker's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Sunny Southern Cali !!!
david , Mr Birdie has and evo 9. do you think the new aem with mivec control is the way to go with this turbo? how much of a difference do you think we here in cali can see with the aem vs a flash?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 07:52 PM
  #57  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I looked at the sheet. 28 whp gains peak and 20 ft lbs peak. 50 ft lbs of torque and about 50 whp gains in the midrange.

Seems pretty darn good to me.

Mr. Birdie,

First let me say I truly appreciate you buying our parts, really I do. So DO NOT take offense to the rest of my post.

This car is not set up how I suggest. It has no FMIC upgrade, no ported exhaust manifold and it is running through a high flow cat. I'd say the power you made on straight 91 octane is borderline GREAT!

Also, do you have an EVO8 or EVO9? If you have an EVO8 I am not sure why you made the cam choice you did. This is not to bash GSC but we have some other cams I'd have recommended, even though I admit I have NOT tested GSC's either.

I just know we can gain atleast 27 whp just from a cam swap on an EVO8 and that's with a mild cam.

Great results I think. 91 octane and cat with minimal mods.
I agree with david

California 91 octane is the worst gas around

Running a high flow cat with that 91 octane really limits your tuning threshold

I would suggest alcohol injection and a test pipe

It seems the OP's car would be closer to 400 whp with 93 octane and a test pipe which makes it a really fast IX
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #58  
MR. Birdie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: So cali.
Honestly twostep just stop it man. Were here to advise others with their knowledge not putting negative comments.

I trust buschur product and yes I did know they ran the 20G-LT on race gas. I just took the chance to see if it can perform on just regular pump gas. Greg from GSC also have told me that it seem like the gas alone is restricting myself from making power. All the dyno sheet people have post on here in regards to the 20G-LT is on 93-94 octane on pump or higher.

I will contact you david in regards to a FMIC but i'm still debating in switching out the HFC to a test pipe. I'm also looking at Perrin Meth kit.

thanx david for the help
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 08:34 PM
  #59  
whitersevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
From: Arizona, FTW
Hey if Birdie, if you go with that fmic, tell me how that works for you, what power you gain, and if you have significant lag or not..
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2007 | 08:53 PM
  #60  
MR. Birdie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: So cali.
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
First of all David Buschur has been a long standing PAYING sponsor of these forums since day one

Second of all David Buschur has contributed a lot of very valuable data and information to this forum on an ongoing basis

You are a nasty and obnoxious individual who should be ejected
That I agree, and the reason why I believe he sale product that work. That's the reason why I bought the TBE, LICP and 02 housing from them. I'm just curious on how many 400whp evo are there on 91 octane. I want to see because I saw some dyno graph off GT3076 turbo on evo 9 that only make 360whp and 350whp.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:41 AM.