Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Blow off valve testing, it really works!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 08:26 AM
  #136  
Bom's Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 0
From: Philly/Jersey
i have finally solved my forge dv problems.
answer: i just added more boost with an MBC. i didn't mess with the springs or added any shims. still rocking the blue spring. now i have a problem with it being tooo damnnn louddd~

FORGE is a great DV holds boost like a champ.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #137  
jfh's Avatar
jfh
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Originally posted by SILVER SURFER
This is a good write up with nice pics, describing the type S with the same modification I posted at the begining of this thread. The test data also matches with my own.
I don't know who they are, but whoever made this, nicely done!

http://www.evomoto.com/tech_info.php?techID=28
Silver Surfer,

First, thanks for all the great info. Excellent thread and exactly the kind of technical information I look for on this forum.

Well, I finally got the Type-S DV and installed it as described in the above link (Single spring).

Do you have yours adjusted all the way out or 2-3 full turns after the adjustment screw makes contact with the spring base plate as the above link recommends?

I have mine adjusted in 2-3 turns and have experienced some low rpm idle problems at traffic lights. Should decreasing the tension adjustment remedy this problem or should I look somewhere else?

Currently running 264/272 cams @ +3 degrees, turbo back 3" with hi-flo cat, and Vishnu Xede w/Stage 1+ 93 octane map.

Thanks,
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 05:06 AM
  #138  
SILVER SURFER's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: D/FW, TX
The valve should be fine with that adjustment, considering your modifications I would definiately look elsewhere. I am running 272/272's with gears and a Power FC and it idles and drives perfectly. Of course the cams required some significant idle fuel adjustments. If your not sure if there is something wrong with your valve, you could always reinstall the stock valve for testing.

You mentioned +3 degrees for your cam gears, did you mean -3 degrees? The general consensus and my own experience is that retarding the cams slightly has a positive affect on performance.
To get the car to idle properly with cams you need to add a lot of fuel at idle without affecting the timing. This is easy to do with a standalone, I am not sure if that is entirely possible with the stock ECU/piggy back? Especially if the stock ECU goes into closed loop mode at idle? Ask Shiv about that.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 05:59 AM
  #139  
jfh's Avatar
jfh
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Originally posted by SILVER SURFER
The valve should be fine with that adjustment, considering your modifications I would definiately look elsewhere. I am running 272/272's with gears and a Power FC and it idles and drives perfectly. Of course the cams required some significant idle fuel adjustments. If your not sure if there is something wrong with your valve, you could always reinstall the stock valve for testing.

You mentioned +3 degrees for your cam gears, did you mean -3 degrees? The general consensus and my own experience is that retarding the cams slightly has a positive affect on performance.
To get the car to idle properly with cams you need to add a lot of fuel at idle without affecting the timing. This is easy to do with a standalone, I am not sure if that is entirely possible with the stock ECU/piggy back? Especially if the stock ECU goes into closed loop mode at idle? Ask Shiv about that.
Yes, I meant -3 degrees timing on the cams. It was idling fine prior to installing the Type-S. I am going to reset the factory ECU and give it another try before making any changes. If there are still issues I will swap back to the stock unit and see if that fixes the problem. If it does, I will then examine the Type-S for correct reassembly, adjustment, and/or leaks.

Thanks
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2004 | 10:23 PM
  #140  
EvolvedfromaWRX's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Import Image Racing
stock valves really do suck when you add boost. saw one lose boost on the dyno last night...thank god i brought my forge...its awesome and makes a great sound (full recirc)
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 04:43 AM
  #141  
jfh's Avatar
jfh
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Re: Blow off valve testing, it really works!

Originally posted by SILVER SURFER
This fitting does see the same air as the valve when it is open so I put a rubber vacuum cap on it for good measure. EDIT: better to leave the cap off, it works either way but...
Originally posted by SILVER SURFER
Yes, I capped that fitting.
Eric,

What was you final solution concerning the lower fitting, capped or open?

Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2004 | 12:27 PM
  #142  
Deceit's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: Ocean, NJ
What kind of boost are you guys running with the Greddy/TxS/etc bov's, or should I ask, what is the max you have ran it with and had a consistant boost reading? I've used the 1g crushed valve for up to nearly 25 pounds with no problem, and some have commented that you can run even higher.

I'm interested in hearing some results with aftermarket valves running higher boost than stock levels, 19-22ish. I'm running 21.5 straight to redline, no problem with the stocker, so I see no need to change it at this current point.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 07:59 AM
  #143  
SILVER SURFER's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: D/FW, TX
What was you final solution concerning the lower fitting, capped or open?
Leave it open.

What kind of boost are you guys running with the Greddy/TxS/etc bov's, or should I ask, what is the max you have ran it with and had a consistant boost reading? I've used the 1g crushed valve for up to nearly 25 pounds with no problem, and some have commented that you can run even higher.
You are correct, the stock DV and all of these other valves can handle as much boost as you could possibly want to make with this engine. Unless maybe there is somthing wrong with the valve or it is improperly installed.

This is one of the biggest misconceptions that is constantly perpetuated in here. I wrote the following quote on the previous page of this thread. READ IT, think about it, use a little common sense. Then try to explain to me how or why a DV/BOV (stock configuration) could start openning at 25 or even 30-40 PSI for that matter.

Think about it for a minute, the actuator has a larger surface area (greater mechanical advantage) with virtually the same pressure pushing down as the valve has trying to force it open, plus a 12 pound spring tension. How could it possibly leak? Based on my own testing, I can tell you that it does not leak, and logically it can't.
There are a lot of misconceptions out there regarding BOV's leaking, and even some authoritive individuals seem to buy into this. Maybe they are just trying to sell BOV's I don't no.

If it weren't for the poor seal caused by the plastic on plastic stock valve, plus it's not adjustable. I would never have even replaced the stock valve even for much higher boost levels. The only good reason to upgrade to a larger BOV with a big turbo is for more flow venting which would prevent surging with a larger turbo air flow.
The stock valve can handle plenty of boost, up until the plastic gives out (don't know how much boost it takes to do that). The only reason I replaced the stock DV is because it has a very small leak from the plastic on plastic valve seal. It is not even enough to affect boost levels IMO, but it is a leak wasting a small amount of the turbos output. I measured a solid 3WHP increase by using a valve that seals better. I also found that by softening the spring tension (lower than stock) the drivability improved as well.

If you route manifold pressure to the bottom of the actuator (lower fitting) as some vendors recommend, well then all bets are off. In that situation your relying soley on the spring tension to keep the valve closed. Once you go above that tension value the valve will start to open,most DV/BOV's are not setup this way, especially for the EVO, with it's relatively high boost levels.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2004 | 08:12 PM
  #144  
Deceit's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
From: Ocean, NJ
More great information SILVER, always a big help.

I agree. I have not noticed any problems what so ever with my stock DV, but some have commented on the valve seals leaking a bit. I honestly haven't noticed any sort of leak yet (knock on wood, I suppose).

I installed a Greddy on a few other Evo's and also did the small spring mod. Works great. I haven't yet been able to see how much boost the Greddy can consistantly hold without the smaller spring, but it is definitely smooth. If I ever get some extra cash, I might have to get one for myself. Maybe I have too much DSM in me, but I swear by 1g's just because of their effectiveness for such a great price.

Either way, great info in this thread.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2004 | 10:10 AM
  #145  
earthman's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Hoboken,NJ
BOV aint good.. it REALLY messses up your MAS, and makes hurts the engine big time.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2004 | 05:46 PM
  #146  
jfh's Avatar
jfh
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Originally posted by SILVER SURFER
The valve should be fine with that adjustment, considering your modifications I would definiately look elsewhere. I am running 272/272's with gears and a Power FC and it idles and drives perfectly. Of course the cams required some significant idle fuel adjustments. If your not sure if there is something wrong with your valve, you could always reinstall the stock valve for testing...
Idle fuel adjustments have been made since the cams were installed and there have been no problems with the stock DV. I reinstalled the stock DV and everything is fine again. Something is not working properly with the Greddy. I disassembled it again to ensure there was nothing wrong inside and all looked fine. I am not sure what else to look for in the valve. Any suggestions?

Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2004 | 06:54 PM
  #147  
SILVER SURFER's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
From: D/FW, TX
John,

If your having stalling problems when comming to a stop that indicates that the valve is not openning, or at least not enough. Try backing the adjustment screw out more and make sure the actuator chamber is not leaking. If you could get a hand vacum pump ($15 at most auto part stores), you should see the valve start to open around 16 in/hg, and the actuator chamber should hold vacum. If it's not working properly I bet this test will fail.

Good luck, regards,

Eric
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2004 | 02:11 AM
  #148  
jfh's Avatar
jfh
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Eric,

I agree that it is probably leaking. I am leaving for couple of weeks so the vacuum test will have to wait until my return. I'll let you know how it works out.

Thanks,
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 08:45 PM
  #149  
tweakdsm's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 5
From: Illinois
I just got Greddy-S today (i did single spring mod right away) and turned the screw almost all the way out -installed (went for a spin)
Iam really happy the car pulls harder....

I did test it:

Stock Bov (leaks sloooow spoolup)
HKS SSQ (VTA rpm drop - REC. ? still some rpm drop)
Forge VTA: (rpm drop no metter which spring you go)
TurboXS (sure thing its loud -rpm drop - why you should run vta with less performance)

greddy-s rec. (the best bov for evo imo)

later.

Last edited by tweakdsm; Apr 8, 2004 at 08:55 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 11:36 PM
  #150  
eLiTe eVo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD
Hey guys, this is my first post on this forum, just picked up my lady on tuesday ;] neway, just by observing how many people have the greddy type S bov and said it works for the most part better than stock, it seems like that would be the best way to go... i was just curious as to how loud it was, cause as many of you are, i m a huge fan of that psssshhhhttt sound ;] but i would sure as hell never want to lose performance or have any more leakage than stock just to have a nice sound... basically, how does greddy perform against stock? it almost seems that you should just stick with stock, just because it works so well with the car, minus the fact that it's plastic on plastic... is that a valid conclusion?

--KiD
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:33 AM.