Cossie Cams & FP GREEN Evo IX dyno numbers!!
numbers seem low.... especially torque numbers... do you have thee FP green turbo or not?!? i hope not... Evo IX with cams should be about 355 both whp and torque or more!.. what dyno was this on? i made 330whp and 337torque on a DynoJet with very basic bolt ons found on my signature.. who know maybe it was my BUSCHUR parts
or my very basic mail-in flash...
or my very basic mail-in flash...
Last edited by SilverNine; Mar 20, 2007 at 03:27 PM.
Most people dont understand how much weather affects horsepower on the dyno.
I moved from New Jersey to miami back in 1994 and my car at the time lost 3 tenths in the quarter mile. Not to mention the lack of good fuel. those numbers are great.
I moved from New Jersey to miami back in 1994 and my car at the time lost 3 tenths in the quarter mile. Not to mention the lack of good fuel. those numbers are great.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
From: iN dI CaRiBbEaN
Just posted so you guys could see difference in stock cams vs. cosworth cams
Stop paying attention to the low numbers and start paying attention to the gain in power throughout the power band on what was a maxed safe tune before. Its obvious if the poor gas is affecting the power, then the tuner and car will be limited. But to gain that power on a IX with a safe tune over a car that was already maxed for that fuel is whatis important. The results are on par with what we have seen in the past from IX cams. Are they not?
I don't know if you can say the cossie cams are making more power then the GSC S1 cams.
I guess the numbers are impressive for 90 octane. Damn I thought california sucks with our 91 but 90? jessus I feel sorry for you guys!
I guess the numbers are impressive for 90 octane. Damn I thought california sucks with our 91 but 90? jessus I feel sorry for you guys!









