Cossie Cams & FP GREEN Evo IX dyno numbers!!
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: So cali.
Evolving Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: So cali.
the car had intake, mbc, turboback with high flow cat and no o2 housing, fuel pump, custom tune and a damn bov leak at 22psi spike and 93 octane...
since then i upgraded intercooler, o2 housing, bov, sparkplugs, use of redline oil and in a couple of days i will upgrade my cat with a metalic substrate unit, intercooler piping kit and of course retune again at 23psi...
i have basically the same mods on an IX and got 347whp 367wtq.. ur numbers look good but i think what sets us apart is my buschur tbe.. im also running 23psi boost and no uicp and no licp.. or maybe its the ivey tune.. dunno, either way i def think you can get more outta it
Sean
Listen to Sean mate...
Even when getting a high flow cat, especially if it is a ceramic substrate unit, the restriction is significant especially because we operate in higher boost levels... I would expect at least 10-15whp increase by using a testpipe, but i wont... Prefered to upgrade the cat to a metallic core unit with flow over 600cfm (according to the manufacturer) which will still restrict but much less than the ceramic units...
Even when getting a high flow cat, especially if it is a ceramic substrate unit, the restriction is significant especially because we operate in higher boost levels... I would expect at least 10-15whp increase by using a testpipe, but i wont... Prefered to upgrade the cat to a metallic core unit with flow over 600cfm (according to the manufacturer) which will still restrict but much less than the ceramic units...
Pay attention to the gains throught the power band. Thats pretty much what every tuner/distributer has been preaching since day 1. They make more than that throughout the power band in various places. And the S1's may have a bit more midrange but they do fall off before 7k rpm.
Last edited by NoTec; Mar 21, 2007 at 07:31 AM.
Just eyeballing each cam's dynograph, it appears that:
The Cosworth cams make relatively uniform power gains throughout the entire powerband, up past 7.5k (better for bigger turbo); with the exception of a dead spot around 5200 where they don't seem to be making any power over stock.
The GSC S1's, on the other hand, appear to make the majority of their power gains over more of a daily driver powerband (i.e. 4200 - 6800 rpm).
These graphs should not be used to compare the actual gains between the two sets of cams, as the cars running the cams were not similarly modded (i.e. stock turbo vs FPGreen, and pump 93 vs 90)
The Cosworth cams make relatively uniform power gains throughout the entire powerband, up past 7.5k (better for bigger turbo); with the exception of a dead spot around 5200 where they don't seem to be making any power over stock.
The GSC S1's, on the other hand, appear to make the majority of their power gains over more of a daily driver powerband (i.e. 4200 - 6800 rpm).
These graphs should not be used to compare the actual gains between the two sets of cams, as the cars running the cams were not similarly modded (i.e. stock turbo vs FPGreen, and pump 93 vs 90)
Evolved Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
From: CaLi4nia... home of the ****ty 91 octane
^^ nah, I know he wouldn't hit it on 90 pump.. I want 400 on race gas.. With the fp green on a dyno dynamic since it reads lower then a mustang at least the one I go to
