Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

David Buschur's RS, just finished up with new pics...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #106  
8URVTEC's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Las Cruces, NM
[QUOTE=Rcebowl;4179319]EDIT:

after looking closer are you sure that purple one is a real full-race manifold?

when compared to the pictures on their website... BR's looks closer to a Full-race

"The purple valve cover one belongs to me and it is definetly from Fullrace I bought the GT stage 3 turbo kit from Fullrace for $5699.00!!!!"

Last edited by 8URVTEC; Apr 6, 2007 at 02:56 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 03:29 PM
  #107  
Late Apex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 600
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles Ca
very odd that they have soo many different versions
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 04:39 PM
  #108  
Rcebowl's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
ya that is odd... sorry bro i wasnt trying to dogg on anyone .. and man i'd believe... Geoff and the guys at Full-race KNOW THEIR SH*T so if yours has changed i bet it's for a good reason...

ps clean engine bay
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 07:27 PM
  #109  
Blue Evo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,354
Likes: 2
From: New York City
Originally Posted by davidbuschur

The car just made 643 whp and 510 ft lbs of torque. Running C16 only.

Dyno Sheet


Thanks for viewing.

643 AWHP on the mustang dyno must calculate to about 775 AWHP on a dynojet........sick sick sick..... thats low 9 second territory
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 07:33 PM
  #110  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Lol i didn't know that a dynojet was up to 132 whp difference
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 07:35 PM
  #111  
Blue Evo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,354
Likes: 2
From: New York City
Originally Posted by ifarted2
Lol i didn't know that a dynojet was up to 132 whp difference
I dunno, I went by the 20% rule
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 07:54 PM
  #112  
4TUN8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 1
it's a 150mph car....775 on a dynojet is probably a little low heh.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 07:55 PM
  #113  
4TUN8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 1
btw dave if you're ever looking for a *bad* (and not bad in a good way) driver to rip that thing down the track, I have a camera and will travel!


hahah
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 08:06 PM
  #114  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Originally Posted by 4TUN8
btw dave if you're ever looking for a *bad* (and not bad in a good way) driver to rip that thing down the track, I have a camera and will travel!


hahah
How do you guys get away with passengers and allot less safety equipment in your cars out there? Our tracks up here in the NW are NHRA and man they make you go thru the ringer just to run fast
Full rollcage
Flame suit
Scatter shield
Fluidamper
Doctor maken you cough
Etc....
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #115  
EricJ@AMS's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,652
Likes: 1
From: Wood Dale, IL
Originally Posted by Blue Evo 8
643 AWHP on the mustang dyno must calculate to about 775 AWHP on a dynojet........sick sick sick..... thats low 9 second territory
I would pay ALOT of money to see a GT35R Evo without Nawz lay down anywhere close to 775 on a Dynojet 424x.

Very nice car David. With so much room in the RS engine bay, the stock intake manifold almost looks out of place. It just begs for something wild without the normal space contraints. I wonder how quickly you can switch out an alternator on that bad boy?

Last edited by EricJ@AMS; Apr 6, 2007 at 09:53 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 09:45 PM
  #116  
ROAD RACE VR-4's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: nyc
awesome setup Dave, keep it up.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 09:12 AM
  #117  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Well it is not a normal GT35R... different turbine housing if I recall?

This turbo DB is running seems to be producing well over 700 flywheel hp. Now I thought that was the limit of the 35R. Now either I am wrong (deffo possible! ).... or this modified 35R flows significantly more then a standard one.

The question I have in my mind is... is this a win/win situation? Is there any drawback to this modified 35R? We've all learned that with turbos there is always a tradeoff. However new innovation does occur as well... seems the evo green was good example.

Anyway... DB... can you just sign-on and tell us when this damn turbo spools?

Can you post a graph with boost plotted? Why don't you do that with all the graphs you post?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 09:20 AM
  #118  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
Insane.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 09:24 AM
  #119  
johnjonfenomeno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: East Coast
That Is One Badass Looking Manifold!!!!!
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 05:29 PM
  #120  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Wow, this thread blew up.

240, since you will remove one, I'd appreciate it if it is the second one, the other one is flattering. I do not feel that the 3" inlet effects performance BUT I am not positive and I have the parts at the shop to do a test. I have a laboratory grade MAF sensor that has to go on the car. When I install it I am going to first test the car with the 3" inlet, measure MAF data and take a dyno sheet, then I am installing a 4" inlet and doing the same test. I am curious about the same thing but do not think the performance will be effected, on a larger turbo I'd think it would be a restriction.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:43 AM.