David Buschur's RS, just finished up with new pics...
[QUOTE=Rcebowl;4179319]EDIT:
after looking closer are you sure that purple one is a real full-race manifold?
when compared to the pictures on their website... BR's looks closer to a Full-race
"The purple valve cover one belongs to me and it is definetly from Fullrace I bought the GT stage 3 turbo kit from Fullrace for $5699.00!!!!"
after looking closer are you sure that purple one is a real full-race manifold?
when compared to the pictures on their website... BR's looks closer to a Full-race
"The purple valve cover one belongs to me and it is definetly from Fullrace I bought the GT stage 3 turbo kit from Fullrace for $5699.00!!!!"
Last edited by 8URVTEC; Apr 6, 2007 at 02:56 PM.
ya that is odd... sorry bro i wasnt trying to dogg on anyone .. and man i'd believe... Geoff and the guys at Full-race KNOW THEIR SH*T so if yours has changed i bet it's for a good reason...
ps clean engine bay
ps clean engine bay

Full rollcage
Flame suit
Scatter shield
Fluidamper
Doctor maken you cough

Etc....
Very nice car David. With so much room in the RS engine bay, the stock intake manifold almost looks out of place. It just begs for something wild without the normal space contraints. I wonder how quickly you can switch out an alternator on that bad boy?
Last edited by EricJ@AMS; Apr 6, 2007 at 09:53 PM.
Well it is not a normal GT35R... different turbine housing if I recall?
This turbo DB is running seems to be producing well over 700 flywheel hp. Now I thought that was the limit of the 35R. Now either I am wrong (deffo possible!
).... or this modified 35R flows significantly more then a standard one.
The question I have in my mind is... is this a win/win situation? Is there any drawback to this modified 35R? We've all learned that with turbos there is always a tradeoff. However new innovation does occur as well... seems the evo green was good example.
Anyway... DB... can you just sign-on and tell us when this damn turbo spools?
Can you post a graph with boost plotted? Why don't you do that with all the graphs you post?
This turbo DB is running seems to be producing well over 700 flywheel hp. Now I thought that was the limit of the 35R. Now either I am wrong (deffo possible!
).... or this modified 35R flows significantly more then a standard one.The question I have in my mind is... is this a win/win situation? Is there any drawback to this modified 35R? We've all learned that with turbos there is always a tradeoff. However new innovation does occur as well... seems the evo green was good example.
Anyway... DB... can you just sign-on and tell us when this damn turbo spools?

Can you post a graph with boost plotted? Why don't you do that with all the graphs you post?
Wow, this thread blew up.
240, since you will remove one, I'd appreciate it if it is the second one, the other one is flattering. I do not feel that the 3" inlet effects performance BUT I am not positive and I have the parts at the shop to do a test. I have a laboratory grade MAF sensor that has to go on the car. When I install it I am going to first test the car with the 3" inlet, measure MAF data and take a dyno sheet, then I am installing a 4" inlet and doing the same test. I am curious about the same thing but do not think the performance will be effected, on a larger turbo I'd think it would be a restriction.
240, since you will remove one, I'd appreciate it if it is the second one, the other one is flattering. I do not feel that the 3" inlet effects performance BUT I am not positive and I have the parts at the shop to do a test. I have a laboratory grade MAF sensor that has to go on the car. When I install it I am going to first test the car with the 3" inlet, measure MAF data and take a dyno sheet, then I am installing a 4" inlet and doing the same test. I am curious about the same thing but do not think the performance will be effected, on a larger turbo I'd think it would be a restriction.



