Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2.5l - 10.25:1 compression - EVO IX motor pictures!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 19, 2007, 10:27 AM
  #46  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
mudduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yeah, c'mon - I can't take the suspense anymore - AAAAAAAAUGGGGGHHHHHH!!111!!11!!!1
Old Jun 19, 2007, 01:35 PM
  #47  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
diablo2184's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i would definitely love some more info about the motor itself!
Old Jun 19, 2007, 01:54 PM
  #48  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
sonicnofadz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
C'mon SBR, lets see the graph!
Old Jun 19, 2007, 02:03 PM
  #49  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Spooldyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Boston,MA
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have been running the manely Rods for 1500 miles now with no issues, also running the 35r SBR kit with great luck !

Thanks again mike


Anthony
Old Jun 19, 2007, 03:07 PM
  #50  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
KOEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AndyBandy
ok, so theres not a 93 octane tune in mind then?

i guess my question was geared more towards the range of 93 octane....like for our car stock you can run 22 psi with out much trouble. i would think that if i took my car and swapped my stock compression pistons for 10.25 i would think it would knock too much at 22 psi so i would have to lower that to lets say 18 psi, but i would get more power at less boost on 93 octane.

sounds like a sick setup though
Yes you are correct.

I thought it was weird for Mike was saying they run 22 low boost, and 28 high boost on this setup; because that strangly mimics exactly how this turbo should be boosted on a stock comp. ratio 4g63 - that is 22 on pump and 28 psi on race gas...

I can tell you right now that there is no way this motor can boost 22 psi on pump gas, with any reasonable amount of timing; without knocking.
Old Jun 19, 2007, 03:10 PM
  #51  
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
SIGSP2340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: East Coast
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crcain
2.5 litre... pretty cool.

I really would like to know why AMS and Buschur stay away from selling 4G64 blocks... like 2.4, 2.1 etc. The idea of using the taller block seems logical to me, but maybe there is a reason they don't like it.
Because their to busy setting records with the 2.0L
Old Jun 19, 2007, 03:13 PM
  #52  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
slicedbreadno2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How high does the 2.5 rev up to?
Old Jun 19, 2007, 03:26 PM
  #53  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Silk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee ish
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slicedbreadno2
How high does the 2.5 rev up to?
Read the whole thread pleasee....


With the resrictor on their rally car only about 6k but on a street setup the said 8-8.5k should be easy
Old Jun 19, 2007, 03:30 PM
  #54  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
slicedbreadno2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mkay thanks 8.5 is not bad at all epecially with all that added displacement and torque.
Old Jun 19, 2007, 06:50 PM
  #55  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
mudduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
so if our 2.0's are usually stroked to a 2.3; why can't we take a 2.4 4g64 and stroke it to like a 2.8 ??? teh torque FTW!!!
Old Jun 19, 2007, 11:59 PM
  #56  
Evolved Member
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
any news??? also what will the max RPM be on this motor????

looks an intresting setup. are you keeping the balancer shafts??

thanks CHris.
Old Jun 20, 2007, 12:12 AM
  #57  
Evolving Member
 
boostinpsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Reno
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
definatly something id like to hear more about.

that would be so much fun on an autoX course.
Old Jun 20, 2007, 12:14 AM
  #58  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by KOEvo
Yes you are correct.

I thought it was weird for Mike was saying they run 22 low boost, and 28 high boost on this setup; because that strangly mimics exactly how this turbo should be boosted on a stock comp. ratio 4g63 - that is 22 on pump and 28 psi on race gas...

I can tell you right now that there is no way this motor can boost 22 psi on pump gas, with any reasonable amount of timing; without knocking.
Wanna wager on that? Not just because I know stuff about this particular setup(seen it run at 26psi and been under the hood even), but because I understand rally cars in general. Think of it this way: inhale thru a straw all day while running a marathon. How much actual oxygen does your body get? How do AFR's work in relation to oxygen content and what does a small turbo with a big intercooler do for total oxidizer mass in the cylinder? What does a larger bore do to overall timing? etc., etc.

BTW KO, this wasnt meant to be anything other than instructional...its not an attack just a radical way of clarifying some points. Subaru WRC Rally cars with 92mm bores run 3 Bar through a 30mm and a 10:1 motor or HIGHER depending on altitude on control fuel. Look up the octane rating of FIA control gasoline and you will have a stroke. Like Ted said to Bill "strange things are afoot at the Circle K".

Now from the standpoint of Mike running a similar motor on the street on pump at 22, it depends on what you mean by "reasonable" timing. Considering the stock timing map has about -3* of timing there at peak torque, more than that could be considered reasonable. Is it the 6-7 that a 2.0/8.8 motor could run, no but its still more than the stock 2.0/8.8 motors timing would have. I suppose in that situation I would tend to agree with you more than I would disagree. That rally motor on pump gas would be another matter though. Sorry if it came across wrong or beligerant at first.

JB

Last edited by JohnBradley; Jun 20, 2007 at 12:41 AM.
Old Jun 20, 2007, 09:33 AM
  #59  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
sparky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesoamerica/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 7,905
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by SBR INC
We have been using the 4G64 block for years with a good bit of success, and will continue to do so. It worked well in the 2.1l we ran at 100 acre wood rally, and I am sure will be fine in this configuration as well. Taller deck height, bigger bore, seems logical to me as well Next month I am building one for my daily driver, but with 106 mm billet crank - that should be interesting!
Mike Huml
SBR Inc.
Mike, what is the largest overbore possible with the 4G64 block? I am curious if an oversquare configuration is possible. Something like a large bore, short-stroke, fast revving motor of 2.1-2.2 Liters. Probably you´ve already got a configuration like this. Please let me know.

Last edited by sparky; Jun 20, 2007 at 09:37 AM.
Old Jun 20, 2007, 09:44 AM
  #60  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
R33E8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I noticed you went with the TME 15g turbo but is there any reason you didn't go with the Garrett TR30R instead?


Quick Reply: 2.5l - 10.25:1 compression - EVO IX motor pictures!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:14 PM.