Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2.5l - 10.25:1 compression - EVO IX motor pictures!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 12:19 PM
  #1  
SBR INC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Sanford, FL!!!
2.5l - 10.25:1 compression - EVO IX motor pictures!

Motor is being mocked up now, here are the basic specs:





4g64 block
Billet Brian Crower 102 mm crank
CP custom pistons, 87.5 mm bore 10.25:1 compression
Manley rods
ACL race series bearings

Look for dyno graph soon, this is going into the SBR EVO IX rally car next week for Oregon Trail - Look out Subaru - this is not the 2.1l we ran at 100 acre wood!

Remember, the dyno graph will be a TME 15G turbo, with a 34 mm restrictor - shooting for 460-480 ft/lbs at the wheels.

If this motor works well, we will be building a production version for EVO VIII and IX this summer.

Any questions about the motor set up, or the previous motors in the rally car welcome, please lets keep this on topic

Mike Huml
SBR Inc.

Last edited by SBR INC; Apr 5, 2007 at 12:44 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #2  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
2.5 litre... pretty cool.

I really would like to know why AMS and Buschur stay away from selling 4G64 blocks... like 2.4, 2.1 etc. The idea of using the taller block seems logical to me, but maybe there is a reason they don't like it.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 12:47 PM
  #3  
SBR INC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Sanford, FL!!!
Originally Posted by crcain
2.5 litre... pretty cool.

I really would like to know why AMS and Buschur stay away from selling 4G64 blocks... like 2.4, 2.1 etc. The idea of using the taller block seems logical to me, but maybe there is a reason they don't like it.
We have been using the 4G64 block for years with a good bit of success, and will continue to do so. It worked well in the 2.1l we ran at 100 acre wood rally, and I am sure will be fine in this configuration as well.

Taller deck height, bigger bore, seems logical to me as well

Next month I am building one for my daily driver, but with 106 mm billet crank - that should be interesting!

Mike Huml
SBR Inc.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 01:54 PM
  #4  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Ekk did you have to mill the crank ? i had to send 3 cranks back to Brian than we ended up chamfering the bearings
We also had problems with the Manley rods
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:06 PM
  #5  
SBR INC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Sanford, FL!!!
Originally Posted by ifarted2
Ekk did you have to mill the crank ? i had to send 3 cranks back to Brian than we ended up chamfering the bearings
We also had problems with the Manley rods
No problems what so ever with the crank, however it is designed to use with a chamfered bearing, which the ACL race series is.

I have never had an issue with the Manley rods, and can safely say we sell more Manley Mitsubishi rods than anyone, and have never had one issue that I am aware of.

A note of caution however, the EVO/ DSM 7 bolt Manley rods are designed to work with the 6 bolt rod bearing, the BC crank is designed to use with 7 bolt rod bearing. We had rods made by Manley to work with this crank, and use with the 7 bolt rod bearings.

Hope this helps, sorry you had issues along the way with yours!

Mike Huml
SBR Inc.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:10 PM
  #6  
Nesiop's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 1
From: Mass
Originally Posted by crcain
2.5 litre... pretty cool.

I really would like to know why AMS and Buschur stay away from selling 4G64 blocks... like 2.4, 2.1 etc. The idea of using the taller block seems logical to me, but maybe there is a reason they don't like it.
AMS and Dan Bajalis both use 2.1l motors.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:12 PM
  #7  
Randy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by Nesiop
AMS and Dan Bajalis both use 2.1l motors.
Hmm they claim is a 2.0 L or so I've heared....
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:14 PM
  #8  
Paul Nelson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Originally Posted by SBR INC
No problems what so ever with the crank, however it is designed to use with a chamfered bearing, which the ACL race series is.

I have never had an issue with the Manley rods, and can safely say we sell more Manley Mitsubishi rods than anyone, and have never had one issue that I am aware of.

A note of caution however, the EVO/ DSM 7 bolt Manley rods are designed to work with the 6 bolt rod bearing, the BC crank is designed to use with 7 bolt rod bearing. We had rods made by Manley to work with this crank, and use with the 7 bolt rod bearings.

Hope this helps, sorry you had issues along the way with yours!

Mike Huml
SBR Inc.
Ahh well
Im glad your build works for ya!

Brian is a good guy and hes sending me some new 288 cams to try out
O and we used the ACL bearings Brain sent with the crank but ended up chamfering them for whatever reason
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:18 PM
  #9  
Czubaka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
What is the planned redline for this setup? This should be one hell of a stump-puller!
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #10  
WheelGap's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Best of luck at Oregon Trail, hope to see SBR/ACP at the top of the podium!
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #11  
SBR INC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Sanford, FL!!!
Originally Posted by ifarted2
Ahh well
Im glad your build works for ya!

Brian is a good guy and hes sending me some new 288 cams to try out
O and we used the ACL bearings Brain sent with the crank but ended up chamfering them for whatever reason
Let us know how the cams work... can you say what type of lift those bad boys will have?

Site is looking good, and big props with going down a different path with the E85!

Mike Huml
SBR Inc.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #12  
inco9nito99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
Wow, this should be interesting, I want to see dynographs..
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:26 PM
  #13  
SBR INC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Sanford, FL!!!
Originally Posted by Czubaka
What is the planned redline for this setup? This should be one hell of a stump-puller!
HEHE - with the restrictor, we will only see about 6k.

If it works well in Oregon, I will build one for the street car and get some good data on a GT3076R. I would assume in this application 8-8250 would be reasonable.

Mike Huml
SBR Inc.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:28 PM
  #14  
SBR INC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Sanford, FL!!!
Originally Posted by WheelGap
Best of luck at Oregon Trail, hope to see SBR/ACP at the top of the podium!
Even getting on the podium is a good day at the office this year Lot's of incredible cars - and the competition is amazing, ACP will have his work cut out for him!

Thank you!

Mike Huml
SBR Inc.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:38 PM
  #15  
AndyBandy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 542
Likes: 27
From: Frederick, MD
10.25 : 1 compression on a turbo car, what range of boost and rpms?

i thought for our cars, we shouldnt go past around 9.5:1 as it limits our range....although you would make more power on less boost...is that the thought?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:06 PM.