Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

AMS Ultimate Fuel Pump Test

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 08:21 AM
  #91  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Ross W
Are you running a walbro in tank directly to the Bosch 044? or via a swirl pot?
No swirl pot. In tank Walbro direct to the Bosch 044.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 08:32 AM
  #92  
slowTsi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
After looking at it a bit and thinking about it, it seems the the intank would boost the output of the 044 by a lesser amrgin, as it is less effected by boost. It appears at a glance that the pumps are sharing the pressure in that fashion. AT 80psi, the 255/255 series has it flowing comporably to what the inline pump does at 40psi. Seems somewhat logical to me that the 255/044 combo will react simlarly and flow 307lph at 80psi.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 08:54 AM
  #93  
High_PSI's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by slowTsi
After looking at it a bit and thinking about it, it seems the the intank would boost the output of the 044 by a lesser amrgin, as it is less effected by boost. It appears at a glance that the pumps are sharing the pressure in that fashion. AT 80psi, the 255/255 series has it flowing comporably to what the inline pump does at 40psi. Seems somewhat logical to me that the 255/044 combo will react simlarly and flow 307lph at 80psi.

Indeed, I concur.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 08:56 AM
  #94  
ExViTermini's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 13
From: Virginia
on the walbro pumps, what was the amperage draw at full tilt?
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 08:59 AM
  #95  
slowTsi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
So is the rig still assmeble making this test possible(intank 255 and the 044 inline)? I can send you my 044 if you no longer have one available.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 03:19 AM
  #96  
CT-PR_Evo8's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: CT
I would like to see a 044 in tank feeding a 044 external
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2007 | 03:22 AM
  #97  
slowTsi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by CT-PR_Evo8
I would like to see a 044 in tank feeding a 044 external
People have run the 044 successfully with just a syphon tube runnig down through the assembly with no feeder pump. There would be no point in buying a $220 pump to feed the 044 as you could just run both of them externally and parallel.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 10:54 AM
  #98  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Excellent thread Martin.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 06:26 PM
  #99  
value's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1
From: Evergreen state
Martin does the AMS 1000HP setup replace the return line back to the tank? Another thread by another vendor is saying the return line is to small to flow excess fuel back to the tank with upgraded pumps causing excess fuel at idle. Thanks for the test and hard work as usual

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=256499

Last edited by value; Jul 17, 2007 at 06:30 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 01:33 PM
  #100  
crcain's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 1
Am I right in reading this that a modified Walboro 255 flows about the same as a Bosch 044 at 80 PSI? Surprised cuz the Bosch is a beast in terms of size compared the Walbro.

Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 01:57 PM
  #101  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
AMS,

Did you get a chance to graph the 12V numbers or any other voltage numbers? If you don't have time to graph them, just post up the data or PM me with the data. Specifically interested in the IX fuel pump numbers.


Thank again for the great tests.


Eric
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 08:58 PM
  #102  
ProPilot04's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 7
From: Holding over the VOR
I'm bumping this thread because it appears that the graph on the front page is missing and I'd like to see it.

I'm running the stock IX pump, looking to upgrade, have had a Walbro before, but would love to not have to listen to it.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 09:11 PM
  #103  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
we carry the DW 300lph and aeromotive 340lph pump which should out pace the walbro easily
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2011 | 09:20 PM
  #104  
ProPilot04's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 7
From: Holding over the VOR
Originally Posted by Mellon Racing
we carry the DW 300lph and aeromotive 340lph pump which should out pace the walbro easily
Both of those are on my short list. I've been following (or followed via search) the release thread for the DW... and ultimately, that'll probably be the route I go. I guess I'd just like to see some data from the testing they did.

I won't be doing anything serious... so I'm not sure I even NEED a fuel pump, but as has been mentioned... cheap insurance.

I'll be running (fwiw):
Cone Filter
Buschur TBE (no cat)
UICP
LICP
Using ECU controlled boost with a perrin EBCS

At least thats my plan. It's on a 9MR, and I don't really plan on getting much crazier than that. I want reliable (quiet fuel pump lol) performance... though, with the TBE... I'm not even sure I'd hear it.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2011 | 08:53 AM
  #105  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by ProPilot04
I'm bumping this thread because it appears that the graph on the front page is missing and I'd like to see it.

I'm running the stock IX pump, looking to upgrade, have had a Walbro before, but would love to not have to listen to it.
see page 5,
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:33 AM.