Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

blown engine on e-85 600 miles......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2007, 07:54 PM
  #31  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
merkzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I was hitting over 100% IDC at 26 PSI tapering to 17 @ 11.5 AFR with PTE 780cc's and a Walbro 255. I'm suprised you were able to run similar injectors on 34 pounds of boost holding 28 to redline, wonder if that was part of the problem =/
Old Jul 18, 2007, 08:06 PM
  #32  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Wazvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ATX
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by merkzu
I was hitting over 100% IDC at 26 PSI tapering to 17 @ 11.5 AFR with PTE 780cc's and a Walbro 255. I'm suprised you were able to run similar injectors on 34 pounds of boost holding 28 to redline, wonder if that was part of the problem =/
Thats what I wanted to note...you are WAAAAY out of your Injectors duty cycle ...good luck
Old Jul 19, 2007, 12:10 PM
  #33  
Evolving Member
 
homemade wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by xspsi4
Yes it was tuned to e-85 and the afr was 11.5 which is rich for e-85 and the balance shafts were still in the car? The turbo is a buschur 20g ported and clipped. The car pulled really hard at first and then the knock sensor took over.
who tuned the e-85 to 11.5?!!!
don't you know what stoich is on ethanol (e-85) varies batch to batch but is in the low nines/high eights...

Last edited by homemade wrx; Jul 19, 2007 at 12:24 PM.
Old Jul 19, 2007, 12:51 PM
  #34  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
KevinD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why doesn't anyone use lambda?

nearly every wideband displays lambda, and with lambda you don't have to calibrate for different fuels. .8 on gas is also .8 on E85.

i think many people miss the point on how he can say his wideband was reading 11.5AFR on a gas calibrated wideband, and how that is equivalent to .78 lambda, or an AFR of 7.6 when using E-85. so he was not running 11.5 AFR on E-85, if he was, thats why his engine blew.
Old Jul 19, 2007, 01:55 PM
  #35  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
robertrinaustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by homemade wrx
who tuned the e-85 to 11.5?!!!
don't you know what stoich is on ethanol (e-85) varies batch to batch but is in the low nines/high eights...
Anybody home there? Read the whole thread. This was already covered.
Old Jul 20, 2007, 10:59 AM
  #36  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
alpha's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KevinD
why doesn't anyone use lambda?

nearly every wideband displays lambda, and with lambda you don't have to calibrate for different fuels. .8 on gas is also .8 on E85.

i think many people miss the point on how he can say his wideband was reading 11.5AFR on a gas calibrated wideband, and how that is equivalent to .78 lambda, or an AFR of 7.6 when using E-85. so he was not running 11.5 AFR on E-85, if he was, thats why his engine blew.
Well said
Old Jul 21, 2007, 05:34 PM
  #37  
Evolving Member
 
homemade wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KevinD
i think many people miss the point on how he can say his wideband was reading 11.5AFR on a gas calibrated wideband, and how that is equivalent to .78 lambda, or an AFR of 7.6 when using E-85. so he was not running 11.5 AFR on E-85, if he was, thats why his engine blew.
yes and on many you can recalibrate to read and display air fuel for e-85...was guessing he had done that...I do read lambda myself though

did you guys recalibrate yours out at UTA I know I did at ODU...just for the dummies on the team though...used mass on the dyno.

Originally Posted by robertrinaustin
Anybody home there? Read the whole thread. This was already covered.
yeah, definately didn't do it...need to make a habit of seeing how old threads are before posting
Old Jul 21, 2007, 06:41 PM
  #38  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Something is wrong with your wideband or boost gauge or something, because 780CC injectors cannot support a maxed out 20G using E-85.

780cc*4=3120cc/min


E-85 sg .78

3120*.78=2433.6g/min = 5.36 lb/min E-85


E-85 stoich is about 9.7:1 AFR, or 1.0 lambda = same as 14.7 AFR on your gas wideband

Using your gas wideband, your injectors could support the following air flow:

11:1 (.75 lambda, which is .75*9.7=7.3 AFR E-85) - 7.3*5.36lb/min E-85 = 39 lb/min airflow
12:1 (.82 lambda) - 42.6 lb/min airflow
13:1 (.88 lambda) - 46 lb/min airflow
14:1 (.95 lambda) - 49.5 lb/min airflow


So, if you are maxing out your 20G, which I would assume you are, holding 28-29 psi with 280 cams, etc, then your 780CC injectors are nowhere close to 11.5:1 as you say. The math shows that you were running more like 14:1 AFR. This is of course assuming that you are maxing out your 20G, which would flow close to 50 lb/min.


Also, one other factor may be the fact that any water comtamination in your oil/E-85 can cause formic acid to form, which could easily contribute to a spun bearing, I would presume.


Eric
Old Jul 28, 2007, 07:15 PM
  #39  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (41)
 
EVO8LTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,603
Received 95 Likes on 82 Posts
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
Also, one other factor may be the fact that any water comtamination in your oil/E-85 can cause formic acid to form, which could easily contribute to a spun bearing, I would presume.
I've read a number of places that damaging formic acid can form when there is free water due to E85 quality issues.

Why is this formic acid not a problem when injecting straight water, or a water/alky mix, through a regular alky injection kit into the upper IC pipe or manifold?
Old Jul 30, 2007, 03:26 AM
  #40  
Evolving Member
 
Flyin EVO 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Glendale Heights, IL
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How long did you have the car on e85 before the enging blowing? I see you put 600 miles on it, but e85 draws moisture from the air. If your oil was contaminated with E85, it will pull water into the oil as well. Valvoline VR1 conventional oil is designed to work with alcohol based fuels as well as some of the racing only synthetics (redline, ams, shaffers, ect). You have to confirm it's compatable either from there web site or directly from the manafacture. I wouldn't trust a dealer because the majority of them just want to move the product off there shelf. Anyone running E85 should be changing there oil and filter at least once a month, or every 2 track events with a compatable oil. If your daily driving on it you should be inspecting the oil on your dipstick at least twice a week. Nobody ever said going fast would be easy or cheap. If they did I want a hit of what there smoking.
Old Jul 30, 2007, 04:01 AM
  #41  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (67)
 
xspsi4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used valvoline vr1 20w50 and prolly changed my oil once a week because of this exact problem, I now know what the problem was, It was way rich and had close to stock timing. I totally blame the tuner whose name I won't mention because they have way too many nutswingers for them to have ever made a tuning mistake. I have tuned my friends evo on e-85 and it hauls *** with very aggressive timing thrown at it and no knock. He has 780cc and a pump. Timing is definitely where the power is made on e-85. I have since blown a fully built motor with the same rod bearing problem so I gave up on the evo and went 2jz power. I will play with e-85 again just not on my car.
Old Jul 30, 2007, 04:22 AM
  #42  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Toddevo 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: atlanta
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
to much boost, for the stock turbo.
Old Jul 30, 2007, 05:38 AM
  #43  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
WrX Kila's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NyC
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Chris.... was this the same motor you sold me for 3 grand. I wondered why you have changed your phone number and you dont want to have any contact with me?
Old Aug 6, 2007, 10:47 PM
  #44  
Evolving Member
 
SaabTuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Davis, California
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by xspsi4
Yes it was tuned to e-85 and the afr was 11.5 which is rich for e-85 and the balance shafts were still in the car? The turbo is a buschur 20g ported and clipped. The car pulled really hard at first and then the knock sensor took over.
No, that's quite LEAN for E-85. Rich for E-85 is 8-9:1.

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=803341

Originally Posted by hotrod from NASIOC
Here are some comparisions of stoichmetric fuel mixtures for different fuel blends:
======== stoichmetric AFR ===== max power rich AFR
Gasoline ---------- 14.7:1 -------------------12.5
100% E-85 ------- 9.73-9.8:1 ------------- ~ 9:1 - 8:1
100% fuel ethanol - 9:1 ------------------- ~ 7.2:1
-Adrian
Old Aug 6, 2007, 11:28 PM
  #45  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Lucas English's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Well I am sure it has been covered in this thread if he was using Gas readings not ALC the 11.5 is a good spot on a gas WB. From my E85 testing with over 50+ mid 11sec passes on it and close to 10k in mi I have found 11.5 on a gas WB is safe and my car runs low 12s out the top due to being out of fuel on my 850's. My car has a stock motor and has been spiking 31psi holding 24psi to redline the hole time and knock on wood has been great. Even has stock head bolts.

If you type in rod bearing on here you will find a min of 1 post per month on a spun bearings. These are the same crank and rods that have been in 93+DSM for years and they also have rod bearing problems.

So maybe the bearing was on its way out from being beat on a a bad pump tune or what ever random problem that the motor could have and making the extra power from the E85 tune just finished it off.

Unless you have a 2nd pump and are running a high base I cant see 750s even coming close on a Evo Green.

I have been running normal syn oil the whole time. Yes it does smell like E85 very fast but does not get milky or seem to be breaking down. Really is hard to find any good info on Ethanol on the net. 99.9% of all the info you find on ALC is Meth which from what I can tell is noting like Ethanol.




Originally Posted by SaabTuner
No, that's quite LEAN for E-85. Rich for E-85 is 8-9:1.

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=803341



-Adrian


Quick Reply: blown engine on e-85 600 miles......



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:14 AM.