Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

*HKS MIVEC Cams Installed: Dyno Inside*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2007, 12:45 PM
  #31  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
JDM_MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EVOheaven
I'm sure your dyno was on a dynojet...his was on an mustang dyno. Plus it was 120 degrees. Please read the whole post.
you guys are just not simply answering my question, with all the external variables to his favor
  • dyno
  • atmospheric pressure
  • etc
, how much more will he make or estimate his final AWHP figure(s)....
Old Aug 13, 2007, 12:52 PM
  #32  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
LIL EVOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Skiatook, OK
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JDM_MR
291 rwhp / 294 rwtq with HKS cams @ 21psi.
Frankly i think that is laame power esp. for a IX. The 1st time I dynoed the 2006 IX MR, it made 278/274 awhp bone stock.

We installed a Full inake system, full 3" exhaust, and HKS UICP/LICP, went back to the dyno and did 312/304 awhp and to also add to that, the Greddy Proec-B wasnt functioning so the boost was eratic.
I honestly think you should be packing way more power than that for a set of "HKS" cams unless you have a **** load of tuning to be done..

jus my 0.2cents

Your .02 doesn't matter. Did you dyno on a Dynojet? If so there you have it. Mustang dyno's read a good 10-15% lower than a dynojet. Hmmm...so that would make me somewhere around 330-335 rwhp on 21psi. Some IXs dyno in the 230s-240s on Buschur's dyno. It was also, 121 deg and an on 91 Oct at 21psi.

What I should have done for all you "dyno queens" is thrown in some race gas and cranked the boost to 25-26 psi and got you the numbers you wanted.

I have no problem running my lame *** "290whp" evo against your what 312? Not a problem.

To all of you that know what your talking about...thanks for the feedback. BTW I spent my money on the cams not yours.
Old Aug 13, 2007, 12:54 PM
  #33  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
fostytou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 3,143
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by shbomb8188
I'm sayin, don't just look at the final numbers, look at the gain. It's not always about peak numbers.

FYI, you need to RTFP too. The only gains shown are from tuning after the install
Old Aug 13, 2007, 01:49 PM
  #34  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Mad_SB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JDM_MR
291 rwhp / 294 rwtq with HKS cams @ 21psi.
Frankly i think that is laame power esp. for a IX. The 1st time I dynoed the 2006 IX MR, it made 278/274 awhp bone stock.

We installed a Full inake system, full 3" exhaust, and HKS UICP/LICP, went back to the dyno and did 312/304 awhp and to also add to that, the Greddy Proec-B wasnt functioning so the boost was eratic.
I honestly think you should be packing way more power than that for a set of "HKS" cams unless you have a **** load of tuning to be done..

jus my 0.2cents
your dyno calibration is way off man. Sounds like it was configured to read crank hp not wheel. So yeah on that dyno you probably would see 40+ whp from a set of cams on an IX.
Old Aug 13, 2007, 02:09 PM
  #35  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
JDM_MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mad_VIII
your dyno calibration is way off man. Sounds like it was configured to read crank hp not wheel. So yeah on that dyno you probably would see 40+ whp from a set of cams on an IX.
then again "oranges vs. apples" is as same as "USDM vs JDM"
Old Aug 13, 2007, 02:17 PM
  #36  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
MIVEC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Smog Valley
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ASE_Tech@TTP
we have one of our cosworth cam cars on a mustang dyno and he made 342 and 352 torque with turbo back exauhst boost controller and a k&n drop in filter
Post graphs please Is this whp?

Last edited by MIVEC8; Aug 13, 2007 at 02:20 PM.
Old Aug 13, 2007, 02:22 PM
  #37  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
MIVEC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Smog Valley
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JDM_MR
you guys are just not simply answering my question, with all the external variables to his favor
  • dyno
  • atmospheric pressure
  • etc
, how much more will he make or estimate his final AWHP figure(s)....
Go make your own thread! Thanks.
Old Aug 13, 2007, 02:23 PM
  #38  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Illrunya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another lame *** arguement over numbers that really don't tell much of a story unless you are looking at before and after gains.

People should quick focusing on the peak numbers and start looking at the gains, and track performances. Traps tell the true story guys.
Old Aug 13, 2007, 02:24 PM
  #39  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
MIVEC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Smog Valley
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mad_VIII
your dyno calibration is way off man. Sounds like it was configured to read crank hp not wheel. So yeah on that dyno you probably would see 40+ whp from a set of cams on an IX.

BS! MIVEC cams don't make that kind of power.
Old Aug 13, 2007, 02:26 PM
  #40  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
LIL EVOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Skiatook, OK
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree^
Old Aug 13, 2007, 02:35 PM
  #41  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
BoOsTinGEVO190's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I put down 340 whp 346 tq on dynojet tbe w/ 2 resonators apexi intake mbc and cosworth cams 23 psi 93 oct
Old Aug 13, 2007, 02:41 PM
  #42  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
JDM_MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BoOsTinGEVO190
I put down 340 whp 346 tq on dynojet tbe w/ 2 resonators apexi intake mbc and cosworth cams 23 psi 93 oct
final figures doesnt matter, it your power gain
Old Aug 13, 2007, 03:06 PM
  #43  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
nikkadanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
nice gains
Old Aug 13, 2007, 03:13 PM
  #44  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
SiCKlEyWiKeD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mad_VIII
your dyno calibration is way off man. Sounds like it was configured to read crank hp not wheel. So yeah on that dyno you probably would see 40+ whp from a set of cams on an IX.
+1. That sounds really close to stock numbers.

I love these arguments over numbers. Go to the track and post your mph gains. That'll say a lot too if you have slips from before.
Old Aug 13, 2007, 03:24 PM
  #45  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Tarmacisback69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pasadena, Maryland
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dyno'd 302 to the wheels on a dynojet with bpu , a friend dyno'd 328 to the wheels on his 07 sti with bpu, hes a decent driver, raced at the track he pulled a fender on me? end result, it dont matter wut u dyno. its how u express the power at the dragtrip or auto-x


Quick Reply: *HKS MIVEC Cams Installed: Dyno Inside*



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:35 AM.