Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

EVO Green Dyno #’s w/ Meth and C-16

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2007 | 11:19 AM
  #31  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
I'd agree on the limits comment. It must be on the verge of the choke flow point. I can't recall what the highest recorded power figure is for a Green (Buschur?).

Last edited by Ted B; Sep 6, 2007 at 11:22 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #32  
SuPeRNeT's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Those are damn good numbers cant wait to see track times!! When are you gona go?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #33  
kouzman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,269
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Since i used the same dyno uncorrected last Saturday which for me is the way to use this dyno...

my full bolt-on IX made 303whp@22psi and 330.4whp@26psi on racegas with a very concervative tune and temps exceeding 110 degrees... earlier this year i made 309whp@22psi but with temps around 70-75 degrees...

i know for a fact that this dyno shows 20% lower than Pruven's dynojet within a 5whp range and almost the same difference from ICS's dynojet...

Also a personal test i did last year on Top Level's dynojet i got 327whp with TBE with high flow cat, intake, e-flash and on that DD i saw 273whp within 5 days difference on the same gas tank...

My personal opinion is that the dyno should be used uncorrected... and let people wonder how on 300whp i trap 114mph...!!!

By the way! AMAZING numbers.... cant wait to see what it will do at the track! probably it could go into 10s with proper driving!
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2007 | 11:35 AM
  #34  
Freddy302's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 644
Likes: 3
From: CT
Originally Posted by Ted B
I'd agree on the limits comment. It must be on the verge of the choke flow point. I can't recall what the highest recorded power figure is for a Green (Buschur?).
I agree it is done.. I wanted to try and max it out.. The HP and trq curves with the fast spool up of Green are great for a street car/daily driver.. which this is..

And I think these are the highest #'s for a FP EVO GREEN

Last edited by Freddy302; Sep 6, 2007 at 02:29 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2007 | 02:52 PM
  #35  
MaelstroM's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Trinidad
that is some serious torque....i wonder what kinda max torque u could get with the stock cams....lol
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2007 | 03:03 PM
  #36  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Freddy302
I agree it is done.. I wanted to try and max it out.. And I think these are the highest #'s for a FP EVO GREEN
It appears as though you did. Rest assured, I'm on your side. Take it to the track.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 01:58 AM
  #37  
RSGuy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
I don't know. Back when David Buschur had the Green on his built RS, it made 440whp on his dyno. That has to equal close to 500whp Dyno-Jet. BUT, that was a fully built car with a lot more mods than Freddy's, including AEM EMS and built motor. So, Freddy's car is definitely insanely strong. With some more mods, this thing will likely be hitting the 500whp mark!
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 03:16 AM
  #38  
fusionchicken's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
From: socal
holy crap this is some serious power considering the amount of money you've put in...wow.....

can't wait for track numbers average trap speed will really tell you how much power u're putting down assuming u're a pretty consistent driver.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 04:39 AM
  #39  
deadbeatrec's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by kouzman
Since i used the same dyno uncorrected last Saturday which for me is the way to use this dyno...

my full bolt-on IX made 303whp@22psi and 330.4whp@26psi on racegas with a very concervative tune and temps exceeding 110 degrees... earlier this year i made 309whp@22psi but with temps around 70-75 degrees...

i know for a fact that this dyno shows 20% lower than Pruven's dynojet within a 5whp range and almost the same difference from ICS's dynojet...

Also a personal test i did last year on Top Level's dynojet i got 327whp with TBE with high flow cat, intake, e-flash and on that DD i saw 273whp within 5 days difference on the same gas tank...

My personal opinion is that the dyno should be used uncorrected... and let people wonder how on 300whp i trap 114mph...!!!

By the way! AMAZING numbers.... cant wait to see what it will do at the track! probably it could go into 10s with proper driving!
if this is in fact true, then there DD is NOT calibrated like a dynojet. 20% is a big difference. but im not sure what he means when he states, "within a 5wp range" 20% is more than 5wp. so what is it, 20% lower or within a 5 hp range?

this is y i question it Ted B.

Last edited by deadbeatrec; Sep 7, 2007 at 04:42 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 04:49 AM
  #40  
svtkiller's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: ATL/ CHATT
WOW to say the least! Nice numbers man.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 04:55 AM
  #41  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by deadbeatrec
this is y i question it Ted B.
I see your point, but this is why we just can't have 'dyno races'. Changes in dynos, changes in weather, changes in temperature, and changes in the dyno settings themselves all tend to muddy the picture. The car is making *very* good power nonetheless, and ultimately, the track is the only place where it counts.

Last edited by Ted B; Sep 7, 2007 at 04:59 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 05:02 AM
  #42  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Good numbers.
We need a rule that says " no amazing HP graphs allowed, unless backed by track passes" would save lots of bench racing.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 05:16 AM
  #43  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
I don't know about that. I kind of like bench racing. No safety equipment, no weight saving measures, no cops, no 'wannabes', and a lot less broken parts.

Last edited by Ted B; Sep 7, 2007 at 05:50 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 05:23 AM
  #44  
binh's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
Amazing. These kind of results always make me rethink turbo choices.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 05:32 AM
  #45  
rr06rs's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: Jville
Originally Posted by binh
Amazing. These kind of results always make me rethink turbo choices.
People say it's not worth it to upgrade from a IX to a green. That's a crock of $H!t. I'm only running 17lbs. due to being limited by the stock injectors and stock turbo tune. The car pulls QUITE harder in this condition than my stock turbo did at 24lbs! And with virtually NO sacrifice in spool and MUCH more dramatic top end pull. This turbo is like nothing I've ever seen on a 2 liter. It truly is the best of both worlds and IMO, the ultimate daily driver/stock motor turbo.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:27 PM.