Thanks FULL FUNCTION for 527 AWHP on Mustang Dyno
Hey Folks,
For comparison, average STOCK EVO 9s make between 217 and 224 (being the lowest and highest to date) on this specific Mustang Dyno. We have nothing to use as a baseline for Pat's car, but this should give you guys an idea...
DynoJets and other inertia based dynos read very differently then Mustangs and other load bearing dynos. I'm sure you can search this forum for a more detailed break down of the two.
Jerry
For comparison, average STOCK EVO 9s make between 217 and 224 (being the lowest and highest to date) on this specific Mustang Dyno. We have nothing to use as a baseline for Pat's car, but this should give you guys an idea...
DynoJets and other inertia based dynos read very differently then Mustangs and other load bearing dynos. I'm sure you can search this forum for a more detailed break down of the two.
Jerry
To answer some ?'s:
Fuel System:
- Walbro 255 in-tank
- PTE 1000cc inj's
Ignition System:
- Stock
- NGK LFR7AIX
In regards to the "Modded BBK TB".......you can find info for it on their website or feel free to give the guys a call there.....really cool to talk to
We are still debating running 40psi and possibly a double-pumper set-up for more fuel and maybe over 550AWHP
Fuel System:
- Walbro 255 in-tank
- PTE 1000cc inj's
Ignition System:
- Stock
- NGK LFR7AIX
In regards to the "Modded BBK TB".......you can find info for it on their website or feel free to give the guys a call there.....really cool to talk to
We are still debating running 40psi and possibly a double-pumper set-up for more fuel and maybe over 550AWHP
Your not having any breakup issue's with the stock ignition? Just wondering, as I have heard when you get to the boost levels your at that it is a concern.
Great numbers! Must be a fun ride!
John
Great numbers! Must be a fun ride!
John
1000cc injectors are plenty for this application. Even 850s would be fine. The reason why your IDC is so high is your fuel pump is not enough for the power. You are losing rail pressure, and the band-aid fix is to open the injectors longer, thus creating high IDC.
You are in need of a fuel pump capacity upgrade. Strongly consider a dual in-tank pump setup. You WILL need to retune when you do this, so be advised.
You are in need of a fuel pump capacity upgrade. Strongly consider a dual in-tank pump setup. You WILL need to retune when you do this, so be advised.
Ya totally stock
If you search under my SN i asked about that as well in a few threads..... as we experience that on a bunch of the Evo's/DSM's from FULL FUNCTION w/ boost levels lower than mine
My 2 major concerns at this level were spark blowout & pushing coolant.
That's why i went w/ the o-ringed block and AMS studs.
Glad to see the ign is holding up......saves me $1000 for now.
TED B--- Would it help to run a larger fuel rail?, or is the best thing in this situation to do a double drop-in pump? Would having a larger fuel rail allow to pull down the injector pulse, or am I on the wrong train of thought?
John
John
The fuel rail won't help. A factory rail will support plenty of power without a hitch.
The problem here is the pump, not the rail. ANY car with a projected output of 550+ whp (DJ) on gasoline (no methanol) should consider a dual pump setup.
The problem here is the pump, not the rail. ANY car with a projected output of 550+ whp (DJ) on gasoline (no methanol) should consider a dual pump setup.
For this Fri's TNT in Sacramento we will be running it on a slightly lower HP setting on a very safe tune to get me some more seat time.
Dan Avon7 - Thanks for posting up in the thread. I think i know some people you know in the area. How's your car doing? Last i heard you made 48x HP but i heard a rumor that the motor let go
I posted up about your car on CAFords streetracing section and i guess a few guys are lookin to run ya.
Last edited by PATRICK B.; Oct 10, 2007 at 08:17 AM.







