Results From My HTA35R Turbo Kit From Buschur Racing!!
Oct 26, 2007, 04:51 AM
#79
No you would not compare it. You are still comparing a 35r to a 67mm turbo, no comparisson. Now if your wondering if the 500-1000rpm lag you get from a 67mm turbo for a 40-50 extra hp over the 35r is worth it. I would say no, its a bad trade off, I could make up that power some where else.
Robert from FP is working in a HTA 67, I will wait till that comes out and then ask your question again between those turbos
Robert from FP is working in a HTA 67, I will wait till that comes out and then ask your question again between those turbos
Last edited by Migsubishi; Oct 26, 2007 at 12:10 PM.
Oct 26, 2007, 06:38 AM
#81
The HTA3065, I would say will come in atleast a few hundred RPM sooner than the standard 3065. Power up top probably won't change much as it is nearly the same with the GT35r compared to the HTA, it's the area under the curve that is increased.
Oct 26, 2007, 11:03 AM
#82
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well as far as a HTA 3065 goes, i think someone should test it first to see if there are any problems with surge (especially for 2.3 guys) so its not a talked up hype and everyone upgrades not knowing side effects, that always makes for a sad day. Like i said though, it would be better worth it just to move to the 35r, that compressor/turbine combo has proven itself over and over to make loads of power without dissapointment.
Oct 26, 2007, 11:12 AM
#83
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No you would not compare it. You are still comparing a 35r to a 67mm turbo, no comparisson. Now if your wondering if the 500-1000rpm lag you get from a 67mm turbo for a 40-50 extra hp of the 35r is worth it. I would say no, its a bad trade off, I could make up that power some where else.
Robert from FP is working in a HTA 67, I will wait till that comes out and then ask your wuestion again between those turbos
Robert from FP is working in a HTA 67, I will wait till that comes out and then ask your wuestion again between those turbos
Someone just needs to run a good comparison between the hta35r and, when it comes out, the hta67 on 110. I'd be interested in seeing if it would be worth the trade off.
Oct 26, 2007, 12:39 PM
#84
We will have to see what the HTA 67 has to bring to the table, i have heard in a lot of cases that it isn't worth going to a 67 unless your upping the boost and running c16 a lot (i run 110). But hey i guess the best tuners will make the power happen.
Someone just needs to run a good comparison between the hta35r and, when it comes out, the hta67 on 110. I'd be interested in seeing if it would be worth the trade off.
Someone just needs to run a good comparison between the hta35r and, when it comes out, the hta67 on 110. I'd be interested in seeing if it would be worth the trade off.
Oct 26, 2007, 10:47 PM
#89
Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At what boost level was this? Im trying to decide between cast and tubular for running pump gas at max 24-25psi with no injection???
Oct 28, 2007, 07:58 AM
#90
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: houston
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've read and re-read this thread and still can't find what the turbine housing a/r was in the "before" mode. We know it was a .63 a/r in the "after" test per Dave's post listed below. But what was it in the "before" test??? Was it .82 or .63? It's been asked a couple times, but I can't see where it's been anwered.
So many comments/questions I can't keep them all straight.
As Robertinaustin pointed out, I did the back to back testing from header to manifold, it is somewhere here on EVOM.
Pete's car was originally dyno'd with a standard GT3582 turbo on it in the cast FP turbine housing and our cast manifold, 2.5" 02 housing.
Pete then changed to our full tubular header kit and the HTA 35R, a 3" 02 housing and the HTA is now in a .63 a/r turbine housing.
The gains are what you see in the dyno graph.
My car has the HTA35r on it, a 2.5" 02 housing and header and has gone 9.77 at 148.32 mph in full street trim on radials.
As Robertinaustin pointed out, I did the back to back testing from header to manifold, it is somewhere here on EVOM.
Pete's car was originally dyno'd with a standard GT3582 turbo on it in the cast FP turbine housing and our cast manifold, 2.5" 02 housing.
Pete then changed to our full tubular header kit and the HTA 35R, a 3" 02 housing and the HTA is now in a .63 a/r turbine housing.
The gains are what you see in the dyno graph.
My car has the HTA35r on it, a 2.5" 02 housing and header and has gone 9.77 at 148.32 mph in full street trim on radials.