Which oil
they had a 3rd party test off K&N vs mobile 1 and a few others. More flow is better so you dont starve the engine. Of course filtering is very important also, but mobile 1 and K&N showed more than enough filtering.
so is Mobile 1 "fully synthetic". I'm not talking about the other oils they make: high mileage, extended performance, Mobile 5000, Mobile 7500 or whatever else they have. But rather straight up Mobile 1 SuperSyn 10w-30. I've also heard the rumor that they are not "fully Synthetic" but their website says they are.
I've been using Mobile 1 since the beginning and have yet to see any oil burning or any problems with my evo. Anyone have hard evidence that Mobile 1 is not.
I've been using Mobile 1 since the beginning and have yet to see any oil burning or any problems with my evo. Anyone have hard evidence that Mobile 1 is not.
What would provide even better data would be for you to run Mobil1 for one oil change interval and send that in for analysis and then compare the wear numbers.
I'm considering doing that on my next two oil changes.
Driving styles on both setups were:
Daily driven with abuse on the street and going to the drag strip.
Only difference now instead of a 2-step 6k rpm launch. I now do a 3.5k Anti-Lag launch. And of course the HP difference.
They used to. Back in 2003 it was mandatory for all new Evo owners to watch this stupid video and take a test. I know a lot of dealerships blew this off, but mine didn't. I tried to stop it. I told them about my previous 4G63 turbo AWD cars and everything, but they insisted on me watching and taking the stupid test. They said upper management is making them do it.
Anyone else remember this video and test?
Anyone else remember this video and test?
anyone know how long the turn around time is?
Just make sure the used M1 is pristine, lol, my used oil container has seen lots of different oils (tranny fluid, antifreeze, etc.) in recent months.


