The rest of my mods are in my sig.
With this setup I have run a 12.58 @ 111.
Click here to see Video
With this setup I have run a 12.58 @ 111.
Evolved Member
shouldn't this setup run low 12 sec or high 11 sec? b/c my friend's 03 evo ran mid 12 w/out cams.
Evolved Member
Brad: How did the swap to the S2's affect your stock turbo's spoolup characteristics in comparison to your previous camshaft setup? Even a seat of the pants assessment would provide helpful insight, thanks!
EDIT: I read on LancerRegister that the S1's spool better than the S2's. What's your take?
EDIT: I read on LancerRegister that the S1's spool better than the S2's. What's your take?
bump for more information.
do the s2's require spring and retainer upgrades?
also do you have a vid of the car in motion? cruisin and WOT?;
sounds great at an idle.
do the s2's require spring and retainer upgrades?
also do you have a vid of the car in motion? cruisin and WOT?;
sounds great at an idle.
Quote:
From the seat of my pants the spoolup feels about the same.Originally Posted by sparky
Brad: How did the swap to the S2's affect your stock turbo's spoolup characteristics in comparison to your previous camshaft setup? Even a seat of the pants assessment would provide helpful insight, thanks!
The dll graph shows basically identical hp and trq curves just that they go higher and stay higher to redline.
There is a very noticeable torque punch with these cams.
Evolved Member
Thanks Brad! So there is a noticeable gain in midrange torque? I am considering going over to these cams from my present setup. I really want to maximize torque and spoolup. I never rev over 7200 RPM. So, I had been considering the S1's.
Quote:
do the s2's require spring and retainer upgrades?
also do you have a vid of the car in motion? cruisin and WOT?;
sounds great at an idle.
Yes, you will need to upgrade your springs and retainers.Originally Posted by 0E3vobutt3r
bump for more information. do the s2's require spring and retainer upgrades?
also do you have a vid of the car in motion? cruisin and WOT?;
sounds great at an idle.
There are several videos of my car racing here http://dsmvideo.vidiac.com.
Quote:
I believe these are a bit more aggressive than the HKS 280's.Originally Posted by scheides
Are these on par with HKS 280's specwise?
Quote:
I am a horrible driver.Originally Posted by fugiwara
shouldn't this setup run low 12 sec or high 11 sec? b/c my friend's 03 evo ran mid 12 w/out cams.
It was my first time at the track.
I was only getting 1.83 60's and my stock clutch is finally giving up on me so I had to slow shift into 4th or it would grind its a$$ off.
The new clutch will be in by the end of the month so I hope to be able to improve on that time.
Account Disabled
I don't think the stock 16g with the small hotside is helping matters, get that HTA 35R bro 

Former Sponsor
Quote:
can you post your dll compare?Originally Posted by Brad@MellonTuning
The dll graph shows basically identical hp and trq curves just that they go higher and stay higher to redline.
Quote:
is the punch harder or softer? can you elaborate please.Originally Posted by Brad@MellonTuning
There is a very noticeable torque punch with these cams.
TIA
Quote:
is the punch harder or softer? can you elaborate please.
TIA
The punch is harder.Originally Posted by Aby@MIL.SPEC
can you post your dll compare?is the punch harder or softer? can you elaborate please.
TIA
I will have to wait until I get home to get that pic off my laptop.

