Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

406WHP/373WTRQ, bolt-ons and meth on Evo IX, DD dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 06:54 PM
  #31  
EnzoFerrari's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by crcain
EXACTLY!
Why is it not one DD sheet in the USA uses it? Because they want to manipulate the #'s if you ask me.
Everyone always wants that dynojet number.

Problem is that most guys convert their DD for dynojet numbers, then post their numbers online saying their on
a heartbreaker dyno and that's not true if your already using a dynojet correction factor...
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:09 PM
  #32  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Nuked
The 329whp trapping 114mph sounds legit to me. My car trapped 114 with 336whp on a Dynomite Dyno (per my 1/8 trap I was down on the backhalf too).
Then your 'Dynomite Dyno' wasn't set in 'heartbreak' mode.

With a DD set at "1.0", 320whp gives trap speeds typically in the 117mph range with a stock framed turbo. Been there, done that.

"336whp" works out to 114mph traps with a Dynojet, or 'Dynojet-like' dyno figures.

FYI
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:17 PM
  #33  
jmelocik's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (153)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 1
From: Still in NC!! Loving retired life!!
Either way, those are nice numbers and the graph is cool to look at! Who cares where it came from!?!?!?!?! LOL I can post some big number graphs too! Of course it wouldn't be my car. Not saying that's what happened here.

Josh
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #34  
mcwop23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 9
From: Gainesville, FL
Originally Posted by RevMoto
It is probably a 1.04 correction factor. Please don't come on here with an abnormally high hp number and say you are on a heart breaker dyno. I mod evo's all day and ride along with 4ws on all of his tunes and you are not making that on pump without cams. I am high considering I was on a dynojet, have a race manifold and tuned better than you. No hate at all but you were shown a number that is not true. You are laking a huge power adder which is a manifold. Please provide us with the correction factor. Also seems weird how you only gained 30whp going from pump to meth. If you were a high hp car you would be well over 400whp. Most cars after adding meth normally gain 60whp.
My tuner is pretty decent, and since when does a manifold do all that much on a stock turbo?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:33 PM
  #35  
SWOLN's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 13
From: In the Florida Swamps
Originally Posted by mcwop23
My tuner is pretty decent
I know it says Mase tuned in your signature, but did he actually do the tune? ...or do you need to change it still? Thanks
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #36  
mcwop23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 9
From: Gainesville, FL
no he was the one who tuned it again, he will always tune my cars
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:39 PM
  #37  
wshihdnevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma
Originally Posted by RevMoto
You are laking a huge power adder which is a manifold. Please provide us with the correction factor. Also seems weird how you only gained 30whp going from pump to meth. If you were a high hp car you would be well over 400whp. Most cars after adding meth normally gain 60whp.

I thought those numbers were low too, glad im not alone. Especially since its 100% meth being used and thats low boost too, boost needs to be turned up if running 93/meth...
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #38  
mcwop23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 9
From: Gainesville, FL
turning the boost up made no more power so we kept it where it was at.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:49 PM
  #39  
Tarmacisback69's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Maryland
328whp and trapping 114 seems correct. If some evos are trapping as high as 106 stock, with an exhaust and boost controller , it seems 110mph isnt out of the question at all. So with it tune to perfection its legit.

With that meth u should be trapping atleast 118 and running 11.7-11.8s

My buddy dyno'd 395/415 tq with pretty much the exact mods as you. added the greddy mivec cams and did 408/430 tq. 11.7s consistently. Traction is a real issue with all the tq.

as far as exhaust manifolds. I dont really see an increase, i had the megan mani. stock mani ported, and currently a full race pro stock mani. No noticeable gains at all. I really shouldve just kept the stock ported and saved the money.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 07:51 PM
  #40  
Nuked's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Morgantown, WV
Originally Posted by Ted B
Then your 'Dynomite Dyno' wasn't set in 'heartbreak' mode.

With a DD set at "1.0", 320whp gives trap speeds typically in the 117mph range with a stock framed turbo. Been there, done that.

"336whp" works out to 114mph traps with a Dynojet, or 'Dynojet-like' dyno figures.

FYI
I trapped 91mph in the 1/8, and 114 in the 1/4. You know as well as I do that most stock framed turbos trap 116 or so with that trap in the front half.

SQ
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 08:10 PM
  #41  
wshihdnevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma
^oic, still think its high for not having cams
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 08:12 PM
  #42  
mcwop23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,152
Likes: 9
From: Gainesville, FL
i'm hoping for 117-118 traps on pump let alone meth.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #43  
jaxredevo1's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville FL
wow pll are so funny so much hating no one can be happy for him. most plll on here will never know how hes car runs i will drive it tomorrow and see how it is and i was at the dyno and we have video of it we can post i think the tuner is good might tune my car next
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 08:33 PM
  #44  
wshihdnevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma
^ I think some are hating, but its more or less just facts. Im not hating on him, but just stating that most evos in reality dont make these numbers w/ stock cams. Thats all...
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 08:42 PM
  #45  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,093
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
So what changed on straight 93 octane from 329whp to 373whp?

Thats a huge gain on just straight 93 with the stock turbo. What bolt on did you add that gave you 44whp?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:23 PM.