Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Its time... 2.0/2.1/2.3 or 2.4 build ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 06:20 AM
  #31  
Turbojunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: nw
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Fuel doesnt kill the motors unless its straight methanol which is corrosive. The E85 wasnt to blame its just a case of fatigue of the stock bottom end possibly. If the phone didnt ring off the hook I would have gotten to take a look at it today but thats all part of how it goes I guess.

Since we havent even pulled the valvecover off yet, most of the failure theories are just that. There are no leaks, holes, or otherwise, just no fuego underhood. I am going to go in early and make it my goal to see whats going on.

Just to cast my vote and my future build... 2.1 and 10:1
That would be just nasty with the other mods done .

Last edited by Turbojunkie; Jun 10, 2008 at 06:22 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 06:26 AM
  #32  
tweakdsm's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 5
From: Illinois


Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
Buschur Racing 2.0L is all we run in our cars.. Never 1 issue to date!!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 08:41 AM
  #33  
Poloiceberg's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Ny
With a 10.1 ratio how much boost could be ran safely on pump gas on a gt35r? Also if you can't run more that 20 plus psi would it even make sense to run a turbo bigger than say a gt3076 since the turbo will never be in its "sweet spot"? Anyone on here do a high compression build?
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #34  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Most of the high compression builds are either racegas only, pump meth, or E85ish...so I am not sure. 10:1 2.1's arent new though, they have been done in the DSM world for along time.

Main reason I am going to do one is the cost of the block in case of failure. The other problems that they have had in the past I dont think are totally 100% build related, more the crank oiling vs. rpm issues.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #35  
EVIL MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
From: ORLANDO
good luck.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 02:03 PM
  #36  
SBR INC's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Sanford, FL!!!
Originally Posted by Poloiceberg
With a 10.1 ratio how much boost could be ran safely on pump gas on a gt35r? Also if you can't run more that 20 plus psi would it even make sense to run a turbo bigger than say a gt3076 since the turbo will never be in its "sweet spot"? Anyone on here do a high compression build?
10:1 compression ratio and pump gas = a lot of money spent on dyno time to make sure you do not go boom.

With that said - when tune up is correct - 20 PSI and pump gas is about the limit IMO on a 10:1 motor (at least the limit on our tuning ability, I am sure more can be ran)...

Larger turbine side on the GT35R is a plus ---- IE - larger turbine wheel... = less back pressure = more love from your high compression motor.

I run a Borg Warner S366 on my EVO IX - simmilar compression ratio - 10:1, 92 octane, meth injection, ECU flash, stock MAF, 20 PSI - just a tad under 500 WHP.

Great car - fun to drive.

Mike Huml
Slowboy-
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2008 | 03:57 PM
  #37  
Turbojunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: nw
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Most of the high compression builds are either racegas only, pump meth, or E85ish...so I am not sure. 10:1 2.1's arent new though, they have been done in the DSM world for along time.

Main reason I am going to do one is the cost of the block in case of failure. The other problems that they have had in the past I dont think are totally 100% build related, more the crank oiling vs. rpm issues.
can the 2.1 be built at 9:1? any advantages or disavantages with that?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 09:40 AM
  #38  
Poloiceberg's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Ny
Originally Posted by SBR INC
10:1 compression ratio and pump gas = a lot of money spent on dyno time to make sure you do not go boom.

With that said - when tune up is correct - 20 PSI and pump gas is about the limit IMO on a 10:1 motor (at least the limit on our tuning ability, I am sure more can be ran)...

Larger turbine side on the GT35R is a plus ---- IE - larger turbine wheel... = less back pressure = more love from your high compression motor.

I run a Borg Warner S366 on my EVO IX - simmilar compression ratio - 10:1, 92 octane, meth injection, ECU flash, stock MAF, 20 PSI - just a tad under 500 WHP.

Great car - fun to drive.

Mike Huml
Slowboy-
Thanks for the info. So I'm guessing its a bad idea to go with the 10.1 ratio if your looking to run strictly pump 93 octane gas?
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 09:43 AM
  #39  
Poloiceberg's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Ny
Originally Posted by Turbojunkie
can the 2.1 be built at 9:1? any advantages or disavantages with that?
^x2
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #40  
SBR INC's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Sanford, FL!!!
Originally Posted by Poloiceberg
Thanks for the info. So I'm guessing its a bad idea to go with the 10.1 ratio if your looking to run strictly pump 93 octane gas?
9.5:1 on straight 93 octane is about the maximum I suggest if you plan on running above 15 PSI....

That is my personal opinion based on what I have seen here at the shop and on the dyno.

Regards,

Mike Huml
Slowboy -
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 12:06 PM
  #41  
SBR INC's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
From: Sanford, FL!!!
Originally Posted by Turbojunkie
can the 2.1 be built at 9:1? any advantages or disavantages with that?
Yes - a 2.1l can easily be built at 9:1.

Advantages - pump gas hero!

Disadvantages - none that I can think of (I however am a huge fan of the 2.1l - so my opinions may be biased).

Mike Huml
Slowboy -
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #42  
big block ix's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 745
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
I Run a stock size turbo(fp Green) on my stroker(2.3L)

The most important mod for a big motor small turbo car is E.C.U based boost control...Or at least it was on my car...

Boost Taper was out of control with my MBC and EBC...
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 12:14 PM
  #43  
big block ix's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 745
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
373WHP 420TQ On Pump
438WHP 480TQ Race Gas

ECU Boost Control....
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #44  
Turbojunkie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: nw
Originally Posted by SBR INC
Yes - a 2.1l can easily be built at 9:1.

Advantages - pump gas hero!

Disadvantages - none that I can think of (I however am a huge fan of the 2.1l - so my opinions may be biased).

Mike Huml
Slowboy -
comfimed my thoughts. Ive decided its either the 2.1 or "if" my block is good a 2.0 out that. Still waiting for the diagnosis of the motor
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #45  
Poloiceberg's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Ny
Originally Posted by SBR INC
9.5:1 on straight 93 octane is about the maximum I suggest if you plan on running above 15 PSI....

That is my personal opinion based on what I have seen here at the shop and on the dyno.

Regards,

Mike Huml
Slowboy -
Ok, Thanks. You have pm.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:54 PM.