Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

T4Z 88 HTA or Precision 6765 !?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2008, 07:09 AM
  #16  
Evolving Member
 
konstantinosIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Evoland
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vwjeff
i have no idea when it spools, it's late.

If you guys would search for this Dave Buschur has addressed this with when he did my car and he comparied my t4z to the hta35r. It was in the thread he started when he did my car. It was only 2 or 300 rpm later?
200-300 RPM only later?
So it spool full boost at 4500 RPM on a 2.0lt?
Old Sep 2, 2008, 07:10 AM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
xiaoni420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: PottsVegas, PA
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by konstantinosIX
200-300 RPM only later?
So it spool full boost at 4500 RPM on a 2.0lt?
Absolutely not, where did you get that information from??
Old Sep 2, 2008, 07:17 AM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
VWJeff's car is the HTA88, he is using a T3 .82 turbine housing on the car. The same turbo in a T4 housing has substantially more lag.

I don't know what your ultimate power goal is that would be helpful to know.

I have not run the 6765 from PTE, my guess is that for me personally, it is going to have more lag that I find acceptable for any type of street use. It will make killer top end power I am fairly certain of that.
Old Sep 2, 2008, 08:30 AM
  #19  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
apeximprt2nr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am tring to find a turbo that will make close to 775-800. Do you think that both turbos will make that power but the HTA is more expensive and spools a bit faster because that is what I am getting out of this....
Old Sep 2, 2008, 09:37 AM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
775-800 HP, you talking about at the crank or Dynojet or what?
Old Sep 2, 2008, 09:40 AM
  #21  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
apeximprt2nr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dynojet
Old Sep 2, 2008, 11:14 AM
  #22  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
ForcedPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
800whp is a tall order my man. Especially tall if you are putting spool up constraints on it.
Old Sep 2, 2008, 11:56 AM
  #23  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
apeximprt2nr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not....thats why i said I don't care about spool thats why I built the 2.0
Old Sep 2, 2008, 12:03 PM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
staatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Danbury, CT
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've got the 6765. It is def laggy and even with my 2.3 it hits 34psi around 5700ish rpm. I would have loved to do a conversion like Al has done, but FP wont do it. And I'm not going to buy another turbo. So I'm prob. just swapping the backing plate/front cover to a S-cover and hoping it picks up alittle bit of spool back. The turbo breezed pass 680whp at 36.5psi.
Old Sep 2, 2008, 02:07 PM
  #25  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
apeximprt2nr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks staatz
Old Sep 2, 2008, 02:49 PM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Jasil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NO
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
So, we know both turbos are capable of 9's@145mph+ traps in practically full weight street cars, and 8's@165mph+ on a full racetrim car, is that not enough?
Old Sep 2, 2008, 03:59 PM
  #27  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
vwjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas and HATING it
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I will say this now that I am at home. My turbo is not bad on spool, is laggy yes! its not a Red a Green or a stock turbo, but when it hits... hold the fock on cause you will cover ALOT of ground very quick. I dont pay attention to spool I just watch for 9k on the tach. She seems to be happy around 6000 and up if I had to guess? Also a turbo is not a turbo unless it has lag. I love the "wait for it, wait for it".... DAMN, feeling

Before anyone ask's it is a Buschur 2.0, stage 3 head and small cams IMO (M2 Cosworth).

Is the turbo good for a DD... yep. Dave Buschur has done a fantasic job on the tuning so low end drivabilty is fantastic

I dont think the Buschur HTA88 kit is a bad decision in anyway, fitment is spot on, the power and the looks are amazing! And with good/better tires track times would be much better aswell. The car is full weight with nothing cut from it!

I forget what you wanted to do with the turbo, but I will say I aint lost a race yet on the streets... this is on pump gas.
Old Sep 3, 2008, 12:29 AM
  #28  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
haseeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: pakistan
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vwjeff
I will say this now that I am at home. My turbo is not bad on spool, is laggy yes! its not a Red a Green or a stock turbo, but when it hits... hold the fock on cause you will cover ALOT of ground very quick. I dont pay attention to spool I just watch for 9k on the tach. She seems to be happy around 6000 and up if I had to guess? Also a turbo is not a turbo unless it has lag. I love the "wait for it, wait for it".... DAMN, feeling

Before anyone ask's it is a Buschur 2.0, stage 3 head and small cams IMO (M2 Cosworth).

Is the turbo good for a DD... yep. Dave Buschur has done a fantasic job on the tuning so low end drivabilty is fantastic

I dont think the Buschur HTA88 kit is a bad decision in anyway, fitment is spot on, the power and the looks are amazing! And with good/better tires track times would be much better aswell. The car is full weight with nothing cut from it!

I forget what you wanted to do with the turbo, but I will say I aint lost a race yet on the streets... this is on pump gas.

well thats some gr8 info .ive 2.3l and the t4z88hta turbo installation is in progress lets see how it spools on 2.3l ...
will give some updates once its tuned ..
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SmurfZilla
ECU Flash
0
Aug 16, 2015 03:50 PM
goforwand
For Sale - Suspension / Brakes / Handling
6
Dec 29, 2013 07:47 PM



Quick Reply: T4Z 88 HTA or Precision 6765 !?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:49 AM.