2.4L Twin Scroll HTA turbo setup
i think the 4088R makes more sense for what you are trying to do. Most of the misinformed salesman on this forum seem to think the twinscroll 40R is junk and singlescroll hta is the way to go, so im sure once we see more results like these there will be a 40R hta
cant wait to see what it does in a singlescroll housing 
it wouldnt hurt to take a look at the twinscroll T4 borgwarner turbos 60mm, 62mm and 66mm.
also you might benefit from some bigger cams and adjustable cam gears
cant wait to see what it does in a singlescroll housing 
it wouldnt hurt to take a look at the twinscroll T4 borgwarner turbos 60mm, 62mm and 66mm.
also you might benefit from some bigger cams and adjustable cam gears
i think the 4088R makes more sense for what you are trying to do. Most of the misinformed salesman on this forum seem to think the twinscroll 40R is junk and singlescroll hta is the way to go, so im sure once we see more results like these there will be a 40R hta
cant wait to see what it does in a singlescroll housing 
it wouldnt hurt to take a look at the twinscroll T4 borgwarner turbos 60mm, 62mm and 66mm.
also you might benefit from some bigger cams and adjustable cam gears
cant wait to see what it does in a singlescroll housing 
it wouldnt hurt to take a look at the twinscroll T4 borgwarner turbos 60mm, 62mm and 66mm.
also you might benefit from some bigger cams and adjustable cam gears
--Josh
your mods look great.
Like you said the only thing i would change is maybe get an IM...
other than that you good to go.
I for one don't see you making a ton more power with the 40r but i reckon you will most def have more area under the graph for sure and that makes for a good power band.
try it...
Like you said the only thing i would change is maybe get an IM...
other than that you good to go.
I for one don't see you making a ton more power with the 40r but i reckon you will most def have more area under the graph for sure and that makes for a good power band.
try it...
to the ORIGINAL POSTER. ''how made the thread''
pm me if you want a TS t3 full race setup. i have the major parts you will need to make it happen. including the 1.06 t3 housing.
pm me if you want a TS t3 full race setup. i have the major parts you will need to make it happen. including the 1.06 t3 housing.
your mods look great.
Like you said the only thing i would change is maybe get an IM...
other than that you good to go.
I for one don't see you making a ton more power with the 40r but i reckon you will most def have more area under the graph for sure and that makes for a good power band.
try it...
Like you said the only thing i would change is maybe get an IM...
other than that you good to go.
I for one don't see you making a ton more power with the 40r but i reckon you will most def have more area under the graph for sure and that makes for a good power band.
try it...
Thanks for you comments
Oh btw do you have any videos of your car?
--Josh
you should make that power easy with a bit of boost and your powerband will be great.
Like i said next step for you is a good quality IM and then you sorted.
IF you willing to pull your aircon out Full race make a kit with less of a bend on the hot side of the turbo and i am sure that will make a bit more power.
Also you can go with thicker headers as well which they make.
But Geoff is the best man to speak as he advised me on this setup.
Sorry no videos of my car.
when it tuned and running 40 psi i will show you 40r TS vs 911 GT2
Good luck
Ok, but you should be aware that competent head porting will increase power per unit of boost pressure. This is one of the best mods one can make, especially with an increased displacement motor, which will expose the limitations of the ports in a 2.4L 20% earlier than a 2.0L.
You should also be aware that contrary to one might think, enlargening the valves in otherwise factory ports may very well reduce flow.
The better the head flows, the quicker the spool and the more power there is to be made. A factory EVO head is no barn-burner out the box, so be advised that by all reasonable measures, it is undersized for your application. The head is the weak component in your build.
Ok, but you should be aware that competent head porting will increase power per unit of boost pressure. This is one of the best mods one can make, especially with an increased displacement motor, which will expose the limitations of the ports in a 2.4L 20% earlier than a 2.0L.
You should also be aware that contrary to one might think, enlargening the valves in otherwise factory ports may very well reduce flow.
The better the head flows, the quicker the spool and the more power there is to be made. A factory EVO head is no barn-burner out the box, so be advised that by all reasonable measures, it is undersized for your application. The head is the weak component in your build.
You should also be aware that contrary to one might think, enlargening the valves in otherwise factory ports may very well reduce flow.
The better the head flows, the quicker the spool and the more power there is to be made. A factory EVO head is no barn-burner out the box, so be advised that by all reasonable measures, it is undersized for your application. The head is the weak component in your build.

My head is ported somewhat. Mainly for the rough castings but heres some pics







--Josh
Actually, I was wrong. The correct figures are:
753whp - 713 ft/lbs - 40 psi at 4200rpm, tapering to 35 - Q16
Build Details:
2.3L - 1G
9.0 SCR
1991 Unported Cylinder Head
HKS 288/288 cams
1mm Oversize Valves
Garrett GT4088R w/ .96 A/R TS T4
Beyond Redline Performance Prototype IM
2.5” IC Pipes
PTE Large Intercooler
TiAL BOV
FP 4” Intake Pipe
DNP Performance T04 Exhaust Manifold w/ TiAL 44mm Wastegate
JH Racing 3.5” to 3” TBE
Tym Switzer COP Ignition
PTE 1000cc Fuel Injectors
Walboro 255L HP Fuel Pump In-Tank Hardwired, and Walboro 255L HP Pump In-Line Hardwired
AEM EMS
Etc., and so forth . . .
753whp - 713 ft/lbs - 40 psi at 4200rpm, tapering to 35 - Q16
Build Details:
2.3L - 1G
9.0 SCR
1991 Unported Cylinder Head
HKS 288/288 cams
1mm Oversize Valves
Garrett GT4088R w/ .96 A/R TS T4
Beyond Redline Performance Prototype IM
2.5” IC Pipes
PTE Large Intercooler
TiAL BOV
FP 4” Intake Pipe
DNP Performance T04 Exhaust Manifold w/ TiAL 44mm Wastegate
JH Racing 3.5” to 3” TBE
Tym Switzer COP Ignition
PTE 1000cc Fuel Injectors
Walboro 255L HP Fuel Pump In-Tank Hardwired, and Walboro 255L HP Pump In-Line Hardwired
AEM EMS
Etc., and so forth . . .
Would the .96 a/r be the best for my setup or the 1.06 a/r?






