Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2.3 Power Goals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #16  
jayIII's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Antigua & Barbuda
Originally Posted by 05ah8james
Hey everyone,

I've been doing a lot of research on my build and the money has finally piled up for the project to take off. I'm trying to be realistic about my goals here, but I do need some help as I cannot find everything I'm looking for. My goal and questions are as follows.

Setup (I think)
2.3 Buschur Block
Stage 3 Buschur Head
Buschur in tank Double Pumper
Buschur Ported TB and IM
RnR T3 Manifold
PT6262 or HTA35r [help me decide]
Tial 44mm wastegate
QTP 3" Cutout
BR Ignition System [do I need it?]

My goal is ~650awhp on 93 pump gas. This car will be driven daily.

Thank for all the help!
I would change the exhaust mani, go with the HTA35R...and maybe go with a 2.4L.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 06:09 PM
  #17  
staatz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 1
From: Danbury, CT
650 on pump gas? good luck, look to be pushing 35+ psi for that one..
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 08:34 PM
  #18  
justboosted02's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 14
From: northeast
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
The turbo kit proven to make 600+whp on pump is Buschur / Shearer.. The RnR is one of worst flowing Tubular manis from what i have seen.. I think the DP has some sharp turn bends in it too..
the manifold is fine, its just a ramhorn design which has been proven on many applications


the 02 housing is a different story, the manifold puts the turbo far to the passenger side of the car, RnR's way of getting around that is to supply a 2.25" O2 housing with a really sharp bend in it, that is what kills the power.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #19  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by justboosted02
the manifold is fine, its just a ramhorn design which has been proven on many applications


the 02 housing is a different story, the manifold puts the turbo far to the passenger side of the car, RnR's way of getting around that is to supply a 2.25" O2 housing with a really sharp bend in it, that is what kills the power.
I have to look at it again to remember 100% but i still beleive the design on the manifold is junk.. How the runners come of the head also has hard bends in them also and i dont think they are finished cleanly on the inside either like Shearer does.. We are not talking about making 500hp on a 35r, the guy is looking to make more HP than almost any car has made on pump.. He needs a better combination than the RNR IMO..

Mike
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #20  
05ah8james's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 771
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
So do you guys think the turbo is gonna run out of breath here? I would run a bigger turbo, but I dont want tons of lag...
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 02:19 AM
  #21  
haseeb's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: pakistan
u can also add the t4z88hta turbo in ur list ....
btw 650 on pump seems a tall order ,but nothing is imposible dude ..
gud luck and keep us updated ...
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 06:49 AM
  #22  
staatz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,591
Likes: 1
From: Danbury, CT
you can buy my turbo for 600 =) I live close too. Its a 37r with h-cover. I ran it on a 2.3 and it was a fun car. I made 618whp at 34psi on 93/meth and 673 at 36.5lbs on q16.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 06:54 AM
  #23  
05ah8james's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 771
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
How much did you want?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 08:47 AM
  #24  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
650awhp on 93 is a nice goal...good luck and what cam are you running?
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #25  
justboosted02's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 14
From: northeast
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
I have to look at it again to remember 100% but i still beleive the design on the manifold is junk.. How the runners come of the head also has hard bends in them also and i dont think they are finished cleanly on the inside either like Shearer does.. We are not talking about making 500hp on a 35r, the guy is looking to make more HP than almost any car has made on pump.. He needs a better combination than the RNR IMO..

Mike
dont get me wrong, the rnr is not the best manifold out there and is not on par with shearer/full race/ets/custom AWDMotorsports mani . but the manifold is far from junk.

search freddy302 on the forum, he made 804 whp, 6XX wtq with an rnr manifold, 3" O2 and the HTA86

would he make more with a different manifold? possibly

Last edited by justboosted02; Dec 19, 2008 at 12:25 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 12:38 PM
  #26  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by justboosted02
dont get me wrong, the rnr is not the best manifold out there and is not on par with shearer/full race/ets/custom AWDMotorsports mani . but the manifold is far from junk.

search freddy302 on the forum, he made 804 whp, 6XX wtq with an rnr manifold, 3" O2 and the HTA86

would he make more with a different manifold? possibly
The problem is when you are talking 650whp pump gas which is not easy by any means to accomplish that manifold is not what you want on the car..

As far as freddy's thread that thread had so much debate on whether or not the numbers were inflated or not.. many were waiting to see the 150+ mph trap speeds to determine if the #'s were even accurate or not.. I dont know if that happened.. I have personally seen 2 cars on my dyno with that manifold and even with great supporting mods the cars didnt make good power..
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 01:26 PM
  #27  
jid2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 6
From: Redmond - Lake Tapps ,WA
Just a few comments for the OP. The RNR manifold is fitted for a 38mm wastegate, you listed a 44mm, is that correct?

Do you have the O2 housing and downpipe that go with the RNR manifold already? The O2 housing is an issue for sure if you want the big numbers.

I have an RNR manifold on my car that I got for $200. Here are my observations:

1. It was cracked and I had to patch it up.
2. The insides are nowhere near the quality of the other manifolds out there.
3. The basic ramhorn design and shape are OK, and proven on Full-Race Honda manifolds, but the execution is a little lacking.
4. It took me a couple days of screwing around to fit and build a true 3 inch O2 housing to work with the manifold - it wasn't easy.

If you are looking to really squeeze out every drop of power, in the long run it's going to be easier to get a manifold, O2 housing, and downpipe that is still supported and makes good powa. I'm worried that when my manifold continues to crack I'll have to replace all that stuff again.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 01:31 PM
  #28  
Johnboy1065's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville Tennessee
i wouldnt go with tomei 280 cams on a stroker motor....stick with BF272's or Kelford IMO
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #29  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by Johnboy1065
i wouldnt go with tomei 280 cams on a stroker motor....stick with BF272's or Kelford IMO
I agree, i didnt think about the 2.3L.. I would go with BF272's also over the Tomei 280s.. The bf272 work much better down low and you wont be revving this car past 8500 i am sure..

Mike
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2008 | 02:41 PM
  #30  
justboosted02's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 14
From: northeast
+1 on using the kelfords, they work great on the strokers
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:33 PM.