Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

tomie 280 vs bf272

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2009, 10:53 AM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (88)
 
wshihdnevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by haseeb
ny 1 else .....
has any 1 tested bf272 cams against the s2s ?
Just step up to some S3's already!
Old Jan 2, 2009, 10:59 AM
  #17  
Newbie
iTrader: (10)
 
Evo8ftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im going to get the BF272's
Old Jul 14, 2010, 08:04 AM
  #18  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
whitepwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sucktown, MO
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just bought a set of BF272s and from all the dyno graphs that I have found online from people who switched from Kelford 272s and 280s to the BF272s they all saw 20-30whp gains in midrange and topend.. But it's not so much peak power that they're aimed at, it's the overall power band. Your car will make more power and more torque and it will hold it through the rpms much better with the BF272s. I'll be interested to see how mine does on the dyno with them.

As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.

GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.
Old Jul 14, 2010, 10:40 AM
  #19  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (44)
 
GregGSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by whitepwr
I just bought a set of BF272s and from all the dyno graphs that I have found online from people who switched from Kelford 272s and 280s to the BF272s they all saw 20-30whp gains in midrange and topend.. But it's not so much peak power that they're aimed at, it's the overall power band. Your car will make more power and more torque and it will hold it through the rpms much better with the BF272s. I'll be interested to see how mine does on the dyno with them.

As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.

GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.
can you produce a graph that shows this from a set of S2's ground in the last year? I'm about 100% positive that wouldn't be the out come of a true test.
Old Jul 14, 2010, 01:42 PM
  #20  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
omniprobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: hometown cali
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by whitepwr
I just bought a set of BF272s and from all the dyno graphs that I have found online from people who switched from Kelford 272s and 280s to the BF272s they all saw 20-30whp gains in midrange and topend.. But it's not so much peak power that they're aimed at, it's the overall power band. Your car will make more power and more torque and it will hold it through the rpms much better with the BF272s. I'll be interested to see how mine does on the dyno with them.

As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.

GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.
are you saying it made more avg HP wise than the kelfords and gsc s2s?
Old Jul 14, 2010, 02:19 PM
  #21  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
GdotRegEvo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmm im curious !
Old Jul 14, 2010, 02:28 PM
  #22  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
norcalSRTrida's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: pleasanton, ca
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by whitepwr
I just bought a set of BF272s and from all the dyno graphs that I have found online from people who switched from Kelford 272s and 280s to the BF272s they all saw 20-30whp gains in midrange and topend.. But it's not so much peak power that they're aimed at, it's the overall power band. Your car will make more power and more torque and it will hold it through the rpms much better with the BF272s. I'll be interested to see how mine does on the dyno with them.

As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.

GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.


internet tuning (blindly, at best), presumptions, and opinions make this post worthless.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hutch959
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
10
Nov 25, 2016 05:35 PM
boostedrb
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
18
Aug 2, 2012 02:22 PM
sleeper04
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
2
Dec 20, 2010 12:17 PM
boostin@27
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
5
Jul 7, 2007 03:47 PM
Carrier
Lancer Engine Tech
9
Jan 9, 2007 09:56 PM



Quick Reply: tomie 280 vs bf272



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:04 AM.