tomie 280 vs bf272
I just bought a set of BF272s and from all the dyno graphs that I have found online from people who switched from Kelford 272s and 280s to the BF272s they all saw 20-30whp gains in midrange and topend.. But it's not so much peak power that they're aimed at, it's the overall power band. Your car will make more power and more torque and it will hold it through the rpms much better with the BF272s. I'll be interested to see how mine does on the dyno with them.
As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.
GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.
As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.
GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.
I just bought a set of BF272s and from all the dyno graphs that I have found online from people who switched from Kelford 272s and 280s to the BF272s they all saw 20-30whp gains in midrange and topend.. But it's not so much peak power that they're aimed at, it's the overall power band. Your car will make more power and more torque and it will hold it through the rpms much better with the BF272s. I'll be interested to see how mine does on the dyno with them.
As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.
GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.
As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.
GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.
I just bought a set of BF272s and from all the dyno graphs that I have found online from people who switched from Kelford 272s and 280s to the BF272s they all saw 20-30whp gains in midrange and topend.. But it's not so much peak power that they're aimed at, it's the overall power band. Your car will make more power and more torque and it will hold it through the rpms much better with the BF272s. I'll be interested to see how mine does on the dyno with them.
As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.
GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.
As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.
GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.
I just bought a set of BF272s and from all the dyno graphs that I have found online from people who switched from Kelford 272s and 280s to the BF272s they all saw 20-30whp gains in midrange and topend.. But it's not so much peak power that they're aimed at, it's the overall power band. Your car will make more power and more torque and it will hold it through the rpms much better with the BF272s. I'll be interested to see how mine does on the dyno with them.
As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.
GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.
As a comparison.. the GSC S2 cams usually make a bit more down low than the Kelford 272s but the Kelford 272s make more up top and the Buschur BF272s made more everywhere than the Kelfords.
GSC S2 < Kelford 272 < BF272.
internet tuning (blindly, at best), presumptions, and opinions make this post worthless.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FS[SouthEast]: Mivec Cam Gear
hutch959
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
10
Nov 25, 2016 05:35 PM
