Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Buschur head vs AMS head

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 05:41 PM
  #61  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Nice thread...................one of many.

I have a LOT of flow bench data from a LOT of 4g63 cylinder heads. The problem is all of them are the older 1g DSM heads. Yes, I have flow bench data from our heads, no I have never posted them and it's because it is useless. A flow bench is like a dyno and the flow bench we use JKN is also like our Mustang Dyno and reads considerably lower than the industry standard Superflow benches. So our numbers are worthless if you aren't going to compare what you have on this same bench.

I can tell you that our EVO8 has held the MPH record since 2007 and it had our head on it, if that really would make a difference to anyone. It's the same Stage 3 head we sell and use on every customer car. Same one that is on my 9.0 at 159.6 mph street car that weighs 2985 pounds and ran that with an HTA86-35r on it.

I have no had a chance to flow test any other companies head. Believe it or not we rarely see a head from anyone else. Last year we ported 58 cylinder heads and shipped them, that was in 2007 only. That's more than 1 ported head per week. I don't know how that compares to anyone else but it's all we can do to keep up on the demand, we can't do the heads faster than we do now and right now it's a 4-5 week wait to get one, unfortunately.

I have no desire to argue, I made a few references to fast cars just because it's been done 50 times in this thread.

Look around, shop around, decide who you are comfortable with. Think about the 58 guys last year that got a head from us and think about if you've read a negative comment about any of them, I know of none.

Having a who's head is best arguement is worthless.

Our Stage 3 head is $1625. It is hot tanked, pockets are cut, the head is FULLY ported, the combustion chambers are also ported, smoothed and matched in size, it is then cleaned again, the head is o-ringed with a SS oring, new SS coated valves are installed, dual valve springs, titanium retainers and new valve seals.

Good luck with your choice.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 07:49 PM
  #62  
CO_VR4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Call each of the shops who make the head you're thinking about buying. Ask them about targeted performance ranges for their heads. Ask them about flow data and the conditions under which their heads were flowed. Ask them how many of their heads have had failures because they're ported too close to the water jacket, as Ted B.'s quote alluded to. Ask them what their warranties are if that happens to you when the head cracks where it was ported. Ask them for recommendations from well known people who have used their heads. Compare prices and check your pocketbook. Then make your decision.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 08:00 PM
  #63  
Johnboy1065's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville Tennessee
I had the stock head with a regular 35r and hks 272 cams.

I then switched to the buschur stage 3 head with his BF272 cams and gained 92 hp on pump gas. Pretty impressive gains I think!!!
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 08:04 PM
  #64  
2k4EvoVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: "Tri-Cities" WA
LOL. I will stay out of this one.

Chris
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 08:05 PM
  #65  
2k4EvoVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: "Tri-Cities" WA
Originally Posted by CO_VR4
Call each of the shops who make the head you're thinking about buying. Ask them about targeted performance ranges for their heads. Ask them about flow data and the conditions under which their heads were flowed. Ask them how many of their heads have had failures because they're ported too close to the water jacket, as Ted B.'s quote alluded to. Ask them what their warranties are if that happens to you when the head cracks where it was ported. Ask them for recommendations from well known people who have used their heads. Compare prices and check your pocketbook. Then make your decision.
No disrespect but i think you should look into the difference in castings. Internally cut some apart and you will see the differences from 03 to 05.

Chris
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 08:50 PM
  #66  
less10's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: SO. CO.
Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports
We did not change anything else.....the only real change was the head.

My point I was trying to make is to counter your point in assuming the previous headgames head yielded a higher trap speed....conditions were not even close to equal. I think it's pretty clear to see that had the rocker not kicked off in 4th the trap would of exceeded our previous best with the other head. In fact that 171mph run in question we went 128 in the 1/8th...on the 8.42 pass by the 1/8 mile mark we were going 137mph. Quite a bit faster. It's ok to compare but you have to do it against equal conditions...with that rocker popping off all bets were off for an equal comparison. I am by no means bench racing but for those looking for the better performing head its clear without a shadow of a doubt the CNC'd AMS head is far superior to that of our previous hand ported unit....I really don't even thing this can be argued. Just look at the numbers and the dyno graphs posted.


our CNC head was not made to work with a drag car only. That would be silly to do on our part. You can put this head on any evo making decent HP and see gains. Would it make 30whp on a close to stock EVO...of course not. I don't think any head would. Then again putting a head on a close to stock evo would be a waste of money as you are not really moving the CFM to warrant it.

Eric

Awesome man, if it shows that you would have obliterated the previous 171 then its obvious you will duplicate that same mph later on. I am in the market for having a built head done. I like headgames because of the work they did on a head for my k20 motor, but I like to weigh options as well. I see good coming from bushcur, AMS, headgames, JAM...etc etc goes on and on and on. You are definately earning the upmost respect with your posts towards me. I know my posts sound kind of dick headed but the internet doesnt portray my sense of humor at all.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #67  
Evo_Hustler's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
buschur > ams ....for me any day...just my opinion from all my knowledge of reading and I read a A LOT! : )
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 04:56 AM
  #68  
Philthy748's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 536
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports
It doesn't pain me at all. Their head worked GREAT. The fact the AMS CNC head performs better doesn't mean all others are bad. Nowhere in any of my posts in here did I say anything to that effect. The purpose of this thread was to show the best performing head. I posted our data from our past and current head programs to show people so they can see for themselves.
Eric
Thanks for the correction on which head you guys were running, given that you had Headgames stickers on the car, gave Headgames thanks in your youtube vid and I was told directly by AMS employees that you were running a Headgames head back then kind of gave me that impression maybe you were running a stock head and that's your secret sauce

As I have stated before, all three companies make a great quality product,

The one area that is the MOST important and something that is critical in determining what makes a head port 'best' is the intended application that it will be used in... Saying your head is BEST may be true for a 45+ PSI car, but that head I assure you will make a car feel lazy and like DOG CRAP on a 400-600whp car! A huge port with +1mm valves is not going to be the perfect setup and perform best for every application.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 07:38 AM
  #69  
jouniu's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Finland
Originally Posted by Evo_Hustler
buschur > ams ....for me any day...just my opinion from all my knowledge of reading and I read a A LOT! : )
http://users.erols.com/srweiss/tablehdc.htm#MITSUBISHI

This is good reading too
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 08:48 AM
  #70  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
So Ted B. recently said in a response to a question I had on head velocity (as oppsed to flow) that with a FI application like the Evo, you're going to break a water jacket before losing velocity becomes an issue.
Actually Erik, oversized ports will suck with an FI engine just as they do with a NA engine. My comment was this doesn't seem to be an issue with an EVO head, because there isn't enough meat in an EVO head to enlarge the ports sufficiently to create a velocity issue. You will hit water before the port becomes too large. Been there, done that!


Originally Posted by LostSolVTEC
is that due to the fact that the turbo is forcing air into the engine rather than relying on it's own ability to draw in air?
It can't be, simply because that isn't what's happening. The engine has to draw in air with a turbo setup, just as it does normally aspirated. All the turbo does is increase the density of the air in the manifold.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 08:58 AM
  #71  
CO_VR4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (83)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by 2k4EvoVIII
No disrespect but i think you should look into the difference in castings. Internally cut some apart and you will see the differences from 03 to 05.

Chris


No disrespect taken. It doesn't matter to me (or anyone else relying on the shop) whether there are differences in castings. Whether the porter is porting your head from an 03 or from an 05, they should know what the safe porting margins are, and make sure that they do no more porting than the head will safely take when its run hard. You pay the shop big money for THEM doing their homework and knowing when enough is too much. You shouldn't have to cut heads apart -- that's their job to know the limits.

A "great" port job isn't very helpful if it's so thin that it cracks through anytime during its intended lifetime, is it?

That's why the question about whether a shop will stand behind its porting is an important one.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 09:15 AM
  #72  
skyblas's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: MS/SG...now in perth
you want excellent head
get cosworth...
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 09:34 AM
  #73  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
I'm sorry, but there is nothing about the Cosworth head that is especially impressive. You pay for the name. My head flows so much better than Cosworth's head that it isn't worth comparing. And I know this because we tested them.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 11:13 AM
  #74  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Cracking of a cylinder head from porting is very-very rare thing to see. I've seen it in only a few cylinder heads and each one of them have had modified cooling systems. The cores have changed from 2003 to 2006 but I don't feel the differences in the cores effect a port cracking as much as the difference in cooling system changes. Seeing as I know who you are connected to COVR4, I am assuming I know what you are talking about, so figured I'd address it. If I'm off base, it still put more information out there than just your warning and I'm glad to do that too. Many times an entire story doesn't get told to help someone else feel better about their lack of accomplishments. That is not pointed at you BTW.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2009 | 02:39 PM
  #75  
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 13
From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Originally Posted by LostSolVTEC
is that due to the fact that the turbo is forcing air into the engine rather than relying on it's own ability to draw in air?
Originally Posted by Ted B
It can't be, simply because that isn't what's happening. The engine has to draw in air with a turbo setup, just as it does normally aspirated. All the turbo does is increase the density of the air in the manifold.
Well said Ted.....

Last edited by Aby@MIL.SPEC; Feb 21, 2009 at 02:42 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:44 AM.