Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

What intake mainifold is best?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2009 | 09:57 PM
  #31  
Buddlight's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
From: Anchor Town
I like BR intake mani. Proven power, good price
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 02:17 AM
  #32  
HYPERTUNE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
Hypertune may be good, but they've had problems with their TB's. Check the thread on Ted B's bearing failure (oil pump actually, which starved the bearing) for more info.
WOW, I'm surprised you'd say something like that. Funny thing is, only yesterday I read a post about how one of your TB's apparently failed and damaged a customers engine. The feeling I got from your comments were that there may have been other things at play that caused the failure, especially considering it only happend on one customers car. You seeemed to conduct yourself in a very professional manner.

I felt a little sorry for you and was tempted to PM you telling you about a problem I had like that. A customer of mine (not EVO) had a screw come out of one of my butterflies that caused damage to an engine. Thing is, they had welded a wiggins coupling to it.
So,either they disassembled it themselves or they welded it assembled, neither of which is a good idea of course. Either way, I copped the bill and paid it to keep them happy. (they are an otherwise good customer of mine)

So now I do a search for Hypertune, and this is what I find. You, of all people recommending a customer not to purchase my product based on the experience of one person. really surprising.......

It might be a good idea if you and dambikeracer send a PM to TedB and ask for an update regarding the Hypertune TB "problem".

You might be surprised to hear what he has to say.

Actually dambikeracer, If you would be so kind as to PM me, I'll make you an offer too good to refuse in return for you taking a couple of measurements for me. It'll only take you 15 minuites or so, and potentially save you a lot of money.......

TedB is already putting in a big effort to try and get me some more info regarding the EVO TB cable setup. From all the info I have been able to get so far, it seems that only Ted's car has this issue. The thing is I need some help from LHD EVO owners just to confirm my suspicions.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 04:06 AM
  #33  
Indy Evo's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,113
Likes: 0
From: Nitro Alley, IN
Originally Posted by 9sec9
We've had excellent results with the Wilson V2.3+ manifold. Our MPH results speak for actual whp numbers, since it's common knowledge that mph is a direct result of whp. Some things previously posted as 'facts' simply put, aren't. Here's the facts: The Fastest MPH FP-Geen, 133.70-Wilson Manifold, The Fastest MPH FP-RED, 145.16- Wilson Manifold, Fastest MPH Evo IX -157.90, on a single pass of the FP-HT3586-Wilson Manifold. Dyno numbers don't always tell the story. Not too sure how readily available they are, but if you're looking for 'best' as in highest power level, we use the Wilson Manivolds V2.3+
Thanks 9sec9, We have two modified cast intakes that were finished last week and are ready to ship, also we have been working on a intake similar to this one for the Evo. 9sec9 and I will be testing and providing input on a race version, and with that data we will be developing a street version. Indy


Last edited by Indy Evo; Jul 28, 2009 at 04:28 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 06:15 AM
  #34  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
It's not like it isn't in the top 10 threads in this subforum or anything

The TB mention is towards the end, maybe page 11 or so?

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...d-bearing.html
FWIW: I think we've isolated the only remaining oustanding issue, which is either the size the wheel, or the travel of my throttle cable. The former is easily remedied, while the latter may have me scratching my head. I'll give an update to my discussion today.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 06:29 AM
  #35  
ASAPPerformance's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Ft.Lauderdale Fl
We're about to do some testing on a REV3 intake manifold from MAP vs. another shops ported intake...hopefully the owner has the time to do some back to back testing, there should be some good results IMO.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 10:02 AM
  #36  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by HYPERTUNE
WOW, I'm surprised you'd say something like that. Funny thing is, only yesterday I read a post about how one of your TB's apparently failed and damaged a customers engine. The feeling I got from your comments were that there may have been other things at play that caused the failure, especially considering it only happend on one customers car. You seeemed to conduct yourself in a very professional manner.

I felt a little sorry for you and was tempted to PM you telling you about a problem I had like that. A customer of mine (not EVO) had a screw come out of one of my butterflies that caused damage to an engine. Thing is, they had welded a wiggins coupling to it.
So,either they disassembled it themselves or they welded it assembled, neither of which is a good idea of course. Either way, I copped the bill and paid it to keep them happy. (they are an otherwise good customer of mine)

So now I do a search for Hypertune, and this is what I find. You, of all people recommending a customer not to purchase my product based on the experience of one person. really surprising.......

It might be a good idea if you and dambikeracer send a PM to TedB and ask for an update regarding the Hypertune TB "problem".

You might be surprised to hear what he has to say.

Actually dambikeracer, If you would be so kind as to PM me, I'll make you an offer too good to refuse in return for you taking a couple of measurements for me. It'll only take you 15 minuites or so, and potentially save you a lot of money.......

TedB is already putting in a big effort to try and get me some more info regarding the EVO TB cable setup. From all the info I have been able to get so far, it seems that only Ted's car has this issue. The thing is I need some help from LHD EVO owners just to confirm my suspicions.
teds and mine. and thank you ever so much for helping us. im not so worried now about having to re flange and buy another TB because in all reality your TB kicks ***. im glad this is being fixed and we all learn something. a better product just got even better.

p.s. i been going through tom at DI. witch he is also stepped up and went well beyond what most people would do for a customer. thanks tom and HT and Ted B. hope to get the new wheel real soon.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 10:43 AM
  #37  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
IMHO I would go with our Rev3 intake manifold for any of the stock frame turbochargers on the market. Beyond that it gets tricky to determine at which point the larger plenum of something like the Magnus cast intake manifold will begin to outperform. I'm all for more testing!
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #38  
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,695
Likes: 24
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by HYPERTUNE
WOW, I'm surprised you'd say something like that. Funny thing is, only yesterday I read a post about how one of your TB's apparently failed and damaged a customers engine. The feeling I got from your comments were that there may have been other things at play that caused the failure, especially considering it only happend on one customers car. You seeemed to conduct yourself in a very professional manner.
I am sorry if my post was taken the wrong way. I have every confidence in Hypertune products. I was trying to point out an issue that Ted B was talking about with the wheel on his throttle body and was trying to let the person know about this. However, thank you for pointing this out, as I have now realized that as a vendor things can easily be taken as a bash on another's product. And you are totally correct, one issue on one product can often be simply with that single product. And even things beyond the manufacturer's control, which you have pointed out.


So let me try and extract my foot from my mouth, however unintentional. (I guess I spent too much time as a member before becoming a vendor)

Hypertune, please accept my formal apology. Furthermore, I apologize for anything that was misconstrued, either specifically or implied.

I also tried to send you a PM or e-mail to apologize personally, but you don't accept either means of communication so I am limited to this, a public apology.

Just to reiterate to any members reading this, I fully believe that Hypertune produces a superior product. They have proven to produce superior power. And if anyone has a question on a Hypertune product you should contact Hypertune directly instead of listening to me

Hopefully that clears everything up and I am indeed sorry.

Last edited by Erik@MIL.SPEC; Jul 28, 2009 at 01:01 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 01:54 PM
  #39  
allinevo's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
This is a question without an answer....

There are many options which affect spool, where power comes on in the rpm band, etc.

For stock intake manifolds, there are many options....Buschur ported, MAP V1-3, MIL.SPEC R1 and R2.

I prefer a stock look, but want maximum results which may affect spool...so I have a Wilson V2 I purchased off a forum vendor. I may even test it against our R2 just to see what the difference is. Maybe our R2 will perform better? Who knows, until the testing is done....on my car. That being said, with the amount of work that went into the Wilson, I have every belief that it will perform well.

Anytime you increase plenum size from stock you are going to change the dynamics of the engine/car.

Take all this with a grain of salt because I am no engineer.
I agree with you on this one. I have a V2 Wilson and a BR Ported,one has alot more work done to it than the other. For a stock turbo I prefer the BR Ported but for a larger framed turbo (ie:HTA35R) I prefer the Wilson V2 as the larger compressor wheel helps fill up the extra plenum volume.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 03:04 PM
  #40  
PeterDenmark's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Denmark
I'm still waiting for the new AMS F1 intake.. while waiting i have looked at the Magnus intake that looks like it is a very good for high horsepower..
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #41  
zedevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 598
Likes: 1
From: KSA
My Engine Builder at Hydra Performance Highly Suggest the Hypertune T/B And he Guarantee me EVERY THING As i have the HYPERTUNE INTAKE ...
So i Hope that she will work Perfectly .
Built By : HydraPerformance.com
Tuned By MellonTuning.com
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 04:56 PM
  #42  
bogge junior's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
Am i the only one running a JUN manifold?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2009 | 09:45 PM
  #43  
Joshs EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: Thornton, CO & Pasadena, MD
^^^Yes you are. True JDM *****
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 01:08 AM
  #44  
Tonba's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 661
Likes: 1
From: Sydney, Australia
I'd love to have a JUN or Hypertune mani.

But im going to have to stay with stock for now..

Anyonw tried plazmaman intake plenums?
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2009 | 01:24 AM
  #45  
gt42r's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Markopoulo, Greece
HKS Kansai here on my Evo 6.I couldn't be happier!!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:44 AM.