A little light on the lingo...cam gears
Originally posted by uranium9v
Can you drive with the gears exposed like that? Wouldn't road debris interfere with them? I'm guessing they are exposed just for the pics.
Can you drive with the gears exposed like that? Wouldn't road debris interfere with them? I'm guessing they are exposed just for the pics.
Originally posted by AvatarOfWar
The effects of the "cams" or "cam gears"? I wouldn't debate the value of cams - I know they make power. It's why I run them - I'm arguing against spending on cam gears for stock cams. Show me where that makes signifigant gains in and of itself (not with changes to ignition timing and everything else, because then your results are muddled with gains from other mods).
The effects of the "cams" or "cam gears"? I wouldn't debate the value of cams - I know they make power. It's why I run them - I'm arguing against spending on cam gears for stock cams. Show me where that makes signifigant gains in and of itself (not with changes to ignition timing and everything else, because then your results are muddled with gains from other mods).
Last edited by EVO Rosso; Oct 16, 2003 at 02:17 PM.
Originally posted by EVO Rosso
No you don't want to run with the cam cover off. That was just for the photo.
LOL, who cares how they perform without tuning? Yeah with a bone stock car only doing cam gears might not be a good solution and you might only net you 6-8hp as Brett suggested. But that is not the original question of the post. It is, if you have a Stage 1 what is the performance difference with and without the cam gears. The answer to the is more like 10 - 15HP when tuned with the XEDE. I really fail to see the point of wondering what the cam gears do without tuning. I mean your fuel pump won't pass that litmus test. It really doesn't do much until you add the supporting mods and then tune to its increased flow rate.
No you don't want to run with the cam cover off. That was just for the photo.
LOL, who cares how they perform without tuning? Yeah with a bone stock car only doing cam gears might not be a good solution and you might only net you 6-8hp as Brett suggested. But that is not the original question of the post. It is, if you have a Stage 1 what is the performance difference with and without the cam gears. The answer to the is more like 10 - 15HP when tuned with the XEDE. I really fail to see the point of wondering what the cam gears do without tuning. I mean your fuel pump won't pass that litmus test. It really doesn't do much until you add the supporting mods and then tune to its increased flow rate.
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by AvatarOfWar
Shiv,
The effects of the "cams" or "cam gears"? I wouldn't debate the value of cams - I know they make power. It's why I run them - I'm arguing against spending on cam gears for stock cams. Show me where that makes signifigant gains in and of itself (not with changes to ignition timing and everything else, because then your results are muddled with gains from other mods).
Shiv,
The effects of the "cams" or "cam gears"? I wouldn't debate the value of cams - I know they make power. It's why I run them - I'm arguing against spending on cam gears for stock cams. Show me where that makes signifigant gains in and of itself (not with changes to ignition timing and everything else, because then your results are muddled with gains from other mods).
Regards,
Shiv
Originally posted by EVO Rosso
LOL, who cares how they perform without tuning? Yeah with a bone stock car only doing cam gears might not be a good solution and you might only net you 6-8hp as Brett suggested. But that is not the original question of the post. It is, if you have a Stage 1 what is the performance difference with and without the cam gears. The answer is more like 10 - 15HP when tuned with the XEDE. I really fail to see the point of wondering what the cam gears do without tuning. I mean your fuel pump won't pass that litmus test. It really doesn't do much until you add the supporting mods and then tune to its increased flow rate.
LOL, who cares how they perform without tuning? Yeah with a bone stock car only doing cam gears might not be a good solution and you might only net you 6-8hp as Brett suggested. But that is not the original question of the post. It is, if you have a Stage 1 what is the performance difference with and without the cam gears. The answer is more like 10 - 15HP when tuned with the XEDE. I really fail to see the point of wondering what the cam gears do without tuning. I mean your fuel pump won't pass that litmus test. It really doesn't do much until you add the supporting mods and then tune to its increased flow rate.
Do you really fail to see the point, or are you just making confrontation? I was debating what Shiv's associate called substantial on stock cams - 6-8hp. My fuel pump is a supporting mod, and I'm not trying to sell them as a vendor to people claiming substantial HP gains on stock injectors.
No reason to argue really, I have cam gears /shrug
I'm just trying to help others who don't have my budget make a more educated approach to selecting mods. I'd pick quite a few other things over cam gears. GL with your car.
Originally posted by Dale_K
Do those little set screws give enough clamping to keep the gears from getting loose over time?
Do those little set screws give enough clamping to keep the gears from getting loose over time?
That is why so much time is spent by manufacturers designing them. Also why you see some with six screws, anything to try and insure they hold and don't slip. In that respect the cam gears can become very costly.
There are companies that make indexed gears so if you know what setting you want on the gear, they will manufacture them with x amount of advance or retard in them so you have the reliability of a solid gear.
Originally posted by timzcat
Million Dollar question...
That is why so much time is spent by manufacturers designing them. Also why you see some with six screws, anything to try and insure they hold and don't slip. In that respect the cam gears can become very costly.
There are companies that make indexed gears so if you know what setting you want on the gear, they will manufacture them with x amount of advance or retard in them so you have the reliability of a solid gear.
Million Dollar question...
That is why so much time is spent by manufacturers designing them. Also why you see some with six screws, anything to try and insure they hold and don't slip. In that respect the cam gears can become very costly.
There are companies that make indexed gears so if you know what setting you want on the gear, they will manufacture them with x amount of advance or retard in them so you have the reliability of a solid gear.
Brett Payne
Vishnu Performance
AvatarofWar, Let me first say I have no intention of being conformational, especially since you personally have helped me in the past. I have just had a unique opportunity to see 8 Evos dyno last weekend. I was operating the DynoJet dyno and I have not had time to analyse all the graphs but without a doubt the cam gears were a noticeable improvement to all the cars that had them. I can tell you everyone there left with the impression that cam gears on Shiv's Stage 1 were the way to go. Give me some time and I will get some graphs together but unfortunately, I don't have a pure apples to apples car. But I do have several with and without cam gears at various stages of modification. Those with cam gears were always making more top end HP.
BTW, were are your cam gears set?
BTW, were are your cam gears set?
Originally posted by EVO Rosso
AvatarofWar, Let me first say I have no intention of being conformational, especially since you personally have helped me in the past. I have just had a unique opportunity to see 8 Evos dyno last weekend. I was operating the DynoJet dyno and I have not had time to analyse all the graphs but without a doubt the cam gears were a noticeable improvement to all the cars that had them. I can tell you everyone there left with the impression that cam gears on Shiv's Stage 1 were the way to go. Give me some time and I will get some graphs together but unfortunately, I don't have a pure apples to apples car. But I do have several with and without cam gears at various stages of modification. Those with cam gears were always making more top end HP.
BTW, were are your cam gears set?
AvatarofWar, Let me first say I have no intention of being conformational, especially since you personally have helped me in the past. I have just had a unique opportunity to see 8 Evos dyno last weekend. I was operating the DynoJet dyno and I have not had time to analyse all the graphs but without a doubt the cam gears were a noticeable improvement to all the cars that had them. I can tell you everyone there left with the impression that cam gears on Shiv's Stage 1 were the way to go. Give me some time and I will get some graphs together but unfortunately, I don't have a pure apples to apples car. But I do have several with and without cam gears at various stages of modification. Those with cam gears were always making more top end HP.
BTW, were are your cam gears set?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EVO8LTW
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
10
Nov 21, 2004 05:36 PM




