Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Wideband readings.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 03:04 PM
  #1  
jyndrus90's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Wideband readings.....

So I installed my wideband and at 18 lbs my readings are in the 11s. Its 60 derees outside. My question is isn't that lean for a 05 evo with a tbe, o2 housing, intake and bc? The guy said I have a walboro 255 but now I'm unsure of that. The car is untuned. The wideband sensor is behind the testpipe could it be possibly too far?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 04:47 PM
  #2  
jyndrus90's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
anyone?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 04:58 PM
  #3  
binky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut / Massachusetts U.S.A
11's are fine. 11.1-11.4 is where you would want to be.

Definitely get a tune.



-Bink
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 05:21 PM
  #4  
RSMike's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 372
From: New Zealand
how come the norm for tuning is running rich?
i thought max power was made at 12.5 AFR?
why not run 12.5AFR and pull out timing as opposed to running more fuel and more timing?
And i know someone will say they run rich for "cooling" the cylinder... but how much difference can a couple of mls of fuel make?

Just wondering.

Cheers, Mike
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 05:38 PM
  #5  
binky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut / Massachusetts U.S.A
For Evo's 11.1-11.4 is not rich. It's right where it should be

Yes, gasoline makes the most power at 12.5 AFR - however the Evo's combustion chamber is not designed for such a lean AFR (keep in mind the 4G63 engine is almost 20 years old). The Saturn Sky is one of the only cars I know of that can run that lean, I believe it actually runs a 12.5 AFR.


-Bink
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 05:44 PM
  #6  
t-revzr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
My car is at 11.1 im on E85 tho not sure if that matters...
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 08:15 PM
  #7  
jyndrus90's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
I still think somethings fishy why would mitsubishi make the car run so lean stock. I measured and I think my the wideband o2 is too far. It was like 60 in from the turbo. Anyone know if the 10 degree angle on the o2 that AEM recommends is necessary for accurate readings?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #8  
evo@24psi's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Mississippi
My car has been at 11.7-11.8 for 50k+ miles now. 11.2 is on line of rich.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 03:08 AM
  #9  
RSMike's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 372
From: New Zealand
not designed to run a lean AFR?
because it'll generate too much heat? or det issues?
i dont really see your point.
just trying to clarify what you're saying thats all

Originally Posted by binky
For Evo's 11.1-11.4 is not rich. It's right where it should be

Yes, gasoline makes the most power at 12.5 AFR - however the Evo's combustion chamber is not designed for such a lean AFR (keep in mind the 4G63 engine is almost 20 years old). The Saturn Sky is one of the only cars I know of that can run that lean, I believe it actually runs a 12.5 AFR.


-Bink
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 03:23 AM
  #10  
McLaren F1 2003's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 678
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
isnt the sky a direct-injection motor? or no? IIRC, only direct-injection motor can run that lean

but to answer the original question, 11's are fine

but 12.5 is too lean for a boosted motor
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 03:31 AM
  #11  
RSMike's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 372
From: New Zealand
people in NZ and Aussie run 12.5 AFR for boosted cars all the time...
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 03:36 AM
  #12  
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 15
From: Lexington Park, MD
FYI the sky (redline) is direct injection, the woman has one...

As for running 12.5 AFRs... it all really depends on how you choose to tune the car... I run mine at around 11.5/11.6 tapering to 11.1/11.2 however there are a few tuners that like to tune a leaner AFR...
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 06:38 AM
  #13  
97TSiAWD's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: Plymouth, MI
Originally Posted by t-revzr
My car is at 11.1 im on E85 tho not sure if that matters...
If this is on a gasoline wideband, that is quite rich for E-85. You can make quite a bit more power by leaning that out a little more. Even on pump gas, most people target ~11.5:1 A/F ratio. On E-85, I aim for 12:1 A/F.

Originally Posted by jyndrus90
I still think somethings fishy why would mitsubishi make the car run so lean stock. I measured and I think my the wideband o2 is too far. It was like 60 in from the turbo. Anyone know if the 10 degree angle on the o2 that AEM recommends is necessary for accurate readings?
Mitsubishi didn't; your mods probably did. The intake can throw off the MAF readings causing the car to run leaner, as well as the additional flow from the exhaust mods. And 11.x:1 isn't that lean, especially if it's in the low 11s.

Totally stock, the Evos tend to run as rich as 9.x:1 at WOT.

Originally Posted by RSMike
people in NZ and Aussie run 12.5 AFR for boosted cars all the time...
On what fuel? A lot of Evos here run 12.5:1 on race gas or E-85, but no one would want to tune for that on pump gas (which is what I assume the OP is using).

Last edited by 97TSiAWD; Oct 20, 2009 at 06:42 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #14  
RSMike's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,276
Likes: 372
From: New Zealand
Originally Posted by 97TSiAWD

On what fuel? A lot of Evos here run 12.5:1 on race gas or E-85, but no one would want to tune for that on pump gas (which is what I assume the OP is using).
In New Zealand there is 91, 95 and 98 Octane. most people tune on 98.
I'll be tuning my car for about 12.0 - 12.2 AFR when i get my Red from the states.
We leaned up a standard evo 8, from about 11.0 to 12.0 and picked up 30kwatw (40whp) without touching anything else. Running 98 Octane pump gas.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 03:50 PM
  #15  
jyndrus90's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 97TSiAWD
If this is on a gasoline wideband, that is quite rich for E-85. You can make quite a bit more power by leaning that out a little more. Even on pump gas, most people target ~11.5:1 A/F ratio. On E-85, I aim for 12:1 A/F.


Mitsubishi didn't; your mods probably did. The intake can throw off the MAF readings causing the car to run leaner, as well as the additional flow from the exhaust mods. And 11.x:1 isn't that lean, especially if it's in the low 11s.

Totally stock, the Evos tend to run as rich as 9.x:1 at WOT.


On what fuel? A lot of Evos here run 12.5:1 on race gas or E-85, but no one would want to tune for that on pump gas (which is what I assume the OP is using).
I did sorta a custom intake since I got a 4in maf adapter and got a small 4 in filter. Should I leave that or put in the stock airbox for correct readings? I got a new bung welded in because my wideband o2 was like 60in from the turbo
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:57 PM.