850R guy chime in I need you thought...
That would be a sick setup but I didn't feel like paying the extra 1k over my current build...
I think the LR2.4 will be good enough and great street motor.Mikey
No I have not seen with my own eyes, however do you think a PT will out spool the HTA? No they will not. A 6262 spools around 200rpms later than an single scroll 1.06a/r HTA3586 and you can't TS a 6262. The only PT turbo you can TS that I know of is the 6235 with has a garrett core. A TS HTA3586 will outspool a PT turbo of comparison size any day and still make the same peak power. On a 2.4 the TS HTA3586 should cross 200hp around 4k. You won't ever see a 6262 do that!
Why not? You can rev to 8.8k if you want, however it won't last long. The piston speeds on a 150mm rod 100mm stroke motor begins to warp lightyears ahead around 8k. With a LR 156mm rod you increase your revving capability by 300rpms. There are a ton of people that run a std 4G63 2.3 to 8.5k, sharkbite being one of them and never had a problem. The 4G64 2.4 has a better rod stroke ratio and with a 156mm rod it can def rev to 8.5k without any problems. I wouldn't rev higher than that. I know for a fact that 8.5k in a 4G64 LR 2.4 (100/156mm) is much safe and has a lower piston speed at 8.5k than a std 4G63 2.3 (100/150mm).
Does that make sense?
Mikey
Why not? You can rev to 8.8k if you want, however it won't last long. The piston speeds on a 150mm rod 100mm stroke motor begins to warp lightyears ahead around 8k. With a LR 156mm rod you increase your revving capability by 300rpms. There are a ton of people that run a std 4G63 2.3 to 8.5k, sharkbite being one of them and never had a problem. The 4G64 2.4 has a better rod stroke ratio and with a 156mm rod it can def rev to 8.5k without any problems. I wouldn't rev higher than that. I know for a fact that 8.5k in a 4G64 LR 2.4 (100/156mm) is much safe and has a lower piston speed at 8.5k than a std 4G63 2.3 (100/150mm).
Does that make sense?
Mikey
Mikey
im thinking ill run out of breath before 8,500 anyways. gsc s2's and .95 a/r twinscroll turbine housing will be the limiting factor. either way, im sure ill see 625+ on pump and 750ish on good gas.
Last edited by n2oiroc; Apr 20, 2010 at 07:50 PM.
I hear about PTE turbos going bad, i hear about FPs going bad etc. I don't think either company makes a bad turbo that doesn't last at all.. I just think SH*T happens. And I definitely don't decide my turbo choice off what people complain about on internet forums or what a vendors turbo of the year choice is as there getting a better deal at the time and recommends.... Not mentioning any names there.. don't even want to open that pointless can of worms lol. Internet forums can be the single most cause of mis information by far though i will say that.
I have never had an issue with a PTE turbo personally or an FP turbo and ive ran em both quit a bit over the years. Now i do have a good friend of mine that just blew a 80mm FP Red with MAYBE 1500 miles on it. Got the recommended FP lines etc... did everything by the book and it has NEVER seen over 27psi. Compressor wheel is is pieces... Its a mess. Car has like 15K on it BTW. I have also had another good friend of mine go through i believe it was 3 FP Greens when they were first released...
I hear about PTE turbos going bad, i hear about FPs going bad etc. I don't think either company makes a bad turbo that doesn't last at all.. I just think SH*T happens. And I definitely don't decide my turbo choice off what people complain about on internet forums or what a vendors turbo of the year choice is as there getting a better deal at the time and recommends.... Not mentioning any names there.. don't even want to open that pointless can of worms lol. Internet forums can be the single most cause of mis information by far though i will say that.
I hear about PTE turbos going bad, i hear about FPs going bad etc. I don't think either company makes a bad turbo that doesn't last at all.. I just think SH*T happens. And I definitely don't decide my turbo choice off what people complain about on internet forums or what a vendors turbo of the year choice is as there getting a better deal at the time and recommends.... Not mentioning any names there.. don't even want to open that pointless can of worms lol. Internet forums can be the single most cause of mis information by far though i will say that.
good thread lots of good info from blk carbon evo and then the he say she say i will add to the he say she say.not saying that one company turbos are better then the other but that fp and garretts warrenty is far better the pte we all no robert at forced performance goes above and beyond and i have had great luck with garrett thus far i cant say the same for the one pte turbo i have owned.
good thread lots of good info from blk carbon evo and then the he say she say i will add to the he say she say.not saying that one company turbos are better then the other but that fp and garretts warrenty is far better the pte we all no robert at forced performance goes above and beyond and i have had great luck with garrett thus far i cant say the same for the one pte turbo i have owned.
Mikey
