Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Education on PTE Turbo's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 07:01 AM
  #16  
APM Racing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Elmhurst, Illinois
The Rallycross team we work with in Poland likes to run these
http://www.compturbo.com/products/in...&product=CT361
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 07:04 AM
  #17  
APM Racing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Elmhurst, Illinois
If you want power like the 3586hta i would look at the 67mm turbo. Nice thing about the Comp is the center section is rebuildable for a lot less than a Garrett and it has 3 times the thrust load capabilities
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 08:01 AM
  #18  
Bach's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Witness Protection
Originally Posted by Ted B
But what type of 'anti-lag' is that, and how much actual running time does it see?

There is anti-lag, and there is launch control that is casually, erroneously referred to as "anti-lag". IF the 'anti-lag' to which you refer actually dumps fuel into the exhaust (?), any turbo subjected to that will fail in time. If what you have is actually a launch control feature, the cause for the turbo's demise may be something else, which raises different concerns.

It's the true antilag which dumps fuel into the exhaust, but the key in what you said is "with time". The FP turbo might of experienced a total of 10-20 miles of anti-lag turned on (which only kicks in when my foot is off the gas) so all tolled together, not even 10 minutes on anti-lag running time. I know that eventually any turbo will fail due to antilag but I was very surprised and disappointed when the FP failed so quickly, cause I drove the car with that turbo for a total of 1000-1300 miles.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 08:32 AM
  #19  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Bach
It's the true antilag which dumps fuel into the exhaust ...
Which means the exhaust valves, manifold, and turbo are all being subjected to a level of heat that is proven to be destructive.

Your frustration is understandable, but this is a risk that one accepts when using true antilag. Are we talking about a street car here? If so, there isn't any good reason why true antilag should be used on the street.

I advise abandoning the antilag, replacing your turbo, and implementing a much less destructive form of launch control IF you really need it.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 08:42 AM
  #20  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
HTA3582 = PT6162
HTA3586 = PT6262

The PT6765 and PT6265, will spool a bit later then the 62 turbine wheel and not really worth it if your looking for faster spool. They are good for high horsepower though

PT6162 Looking around 4800-5000 and the PT6262 looking around 5000-5200 - Spool time can be reduced with different mods, comp ratio, etc.

The PTE Turbo's have there own center section. They use a cermaic ball bearing center section that is oil and air cooled, no water lines like the Garrett.

Thanks!

Michael
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 10:16 AM
  #21  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Doesn't the HTA86 make more power then the 6262 and as much if not a little less then the 6765?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 10:25 AM
  #22  
red03evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax
Originally Posted by project_skyline
Doesn't the HTA86 make more power then the 6262 and as much if not a little less then the 6765?

That's what I was thinking. The hta3586 was between the 6262 and the 6765 as far as power.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #23  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
From our tests the PT6262 and the HTA3586 seem to make right around the same peak results. (mid 700's)

Precision does have another option as well. A PT6235(35R with a billet 62mm wheel) We have tested this turbo to the mid 700's. You can also run twin scroll since it's a true 35R center section.

Thanks!

Michael
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 10:42 AM
  #24  
APM Racing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Elmhurst, Illinois
Rough max dynojet numbers
6262 785whp
6265 800whp
6765 915whp
3586hta 805whp

Last edited by APM Racing; Apr 13, 2010 at 10:47 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 12:36 PM
  #25  
dambikeracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Originally Posted by APM Racing
Rough max dynojet numbers
6262 785whp
6265 800whp
6765 915whp
3586hta 805whp
What about the 6162 and the 3582?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 12:55 PM
  #26  
APM Racing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Elmhurst, Illinois
3582 HTA 750whp+ could be a little more but this all i remember seeing
6162?HP non billet? 650whp like a standard 35r
All these numbers would be at 40psi+ boost levels
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #27  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
It sounds like you really have no reason to be running "true" anti-lag and to expect the turbo to last the way you want is not going to happen.

The Garrett TR30 series of turbochargers are designed to be used with anti-lag. They feature inconel or ceramic turbine housings, titanium center housings, some exotic turbine wheel material that is even better at high temps then inconel and a different bearing system that deals with anti-lag better. TR30s I've heard are around $10k. Even then, those turbos are still probably considered throw-away items after a small amount of racing because anti-lag is just THAT hard on turbochargers.

It sounds like you like the sound and effect, but really don't need it. I guess you just have to ask is replacing a $1500 turbochargers every 1000 miles really worth it to you?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 01:24 PM
  #28  
dambikeracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Denver
Now which one of these turbos would give me the quickest spool and suite me best for DD at 30 PSI? And or, would I be better off turning my Red in to a Black for $750?

Current set up, 457WHP and 413 WTQ, hit 11.234 @ 123, goals are 10.199 @ 134.99
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 02:51 PM
  #29  
APM Racing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Elmhurst, Illinois
spool 6162,3582,6262,3586,6265,6765 from fast to slowest spool. Any will work at 30psi. As for DD that depends on you. I have people complain about FP green spool up and i have customers who will DD on a 42r depends on you. FP Black is a nice choice as well just not sure how long it will last at 30 psi but should hold up.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2010 | 04:02 PM
  #30  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
Originally Posted by Bach
are PTE turbos "heavier duty" than the FP turbos
its the opposite. the hta's use a garrett center section and the pte's dont as far as i know. pte=garbage imo.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:16 AM.